Page 3 of 5

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 8:30 am
by gofightingducks
greenyellow wrote:
DarronThomas1 wrote:Ivan Maisel posted on his twitter feed that he saw Sumler at the game decked out in duck gear. I don't think we have to worry about losing him anymore.
He's one player that I don't think we have to fear losing. He was also considering Stanford at one point, but he probably saw that he made the right move in choosing Oregon.

Yeah with DT for another 2 years after this season and BB waiting in the wings to get the ball to him for the Ducks and Luck going to the NFL so who knows how good Stanford is going to be without Luck and Harbaugh may not be around too much longer either and Chip staying for at least another 5 years and saying he wants to win it all. I am sure the Ducks will be getting some big commitments over the next few weeks as they continue to win and get more media attention and LMJ gets more and more Heisman hype and the Ducks continue to be in the NC conversation. Go get em' Chip!!!

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 1:22 pm
by gregspechtismyhero
When do the reactions usually come out?

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 5:30 pm
by Lord_Vader
gregspechtismyhero wrote:When do the reactions usually come out?

Whenever someone decides to rip off one of the pay sites and post it here.

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 5:41 pm
by dthomas=ddixon
Lord_Vader wrote:
gregspechtismyhero wrote:When do the reactions usually come out?

Whenever someone decides to rip off one of the pay sites and post it here.
Oooh, good one.

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 6:31 pm
by Supreme
Lamar Dawson and Mr. Avery need to jump on board.


I hope USCw sucking relinquishes their recruiting power.

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 7:44 pm
by Lord_Vader
dthomas=ddixon wrote:
Lord_Vader wrote:
gregspechtismyhero wrote:When do the reactions usually come out?

Whenever someone decides to rip off one of the pay sites and post it here.
Oooh, good one.

Not trying to be clever or anything. No real news is broke here. Its a great board for talking about things but when someone comes on here and asks, "has anyone heard or know anything about such and such" they basically are asking, "has anyone paid a subscription to Rivals/Scout/ESPN and have they read anything they said about how things are going?"

C4Qs is awesome. Lots of activity and lots of views, but one thing that DOESNT happen here is reporting and thats fine, so DT dont get all huffy and puffy about me saying what this place actually is.

I subscribe to Scout and I think it's hilarious how people bitch about having to pay but then bitch when no one comes racing over to post all the goodies and such.

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 11:11 pm
by duckgrad99
Lord_Vader wrote:
dthomas=ddixon wrote:
Lord_Vader wrote:
gregspechtismyhero wrote:When do the reactions usually come out?

Whenever someone decides to rip off one of the pay sites and post it here.
Oooh, good one.

Not trying to be clever or anything. No real news is broke here. Its a great board for talking about things but when someone comes on here and asks, "has anyone heard or know anything about such and such" they basically are asking, "has anyone paid a subscription to Rivals/Scout/ESPN and have they read anything they said about how things are going?"

C4Qs is awesome. Lots of activity and lots of views, but one thing that DOESNT happen here is reporting and thats fine, so DT dont get all huffy and puffy about me saying what this place actually is.

I subscribe to Scout and I think it's hilarious how people bitch about having to pay but then bitch when no one comes racing over to post all the goodies and such.


How much did Jhop pay you to say that? :lol:

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 11:33 pm
by karlhungis
Yeah, it's funny how all of the guys that actually got us some recruiting info on their own have since been hired by pay sites.... Lord knows information shouldn't be free.

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2010 12:29 am
by Boom
karlhungis wrote:Yeah, it's funny how all of the guys that actually got us some recruiting info on their own have since been hired by pay sites.... Lord knows information shouldn't be free.
It's all free eventually........ but if your impatient then a subscription is the way to go

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2010 12:32 am
by Tray Dub
karlhungis wrote:Yeah, it's funny how all of the guys that actually got us some recruiting info on their own have since been hired by pay sites.... Lord knows information shouldn't be free.
Especially not information as super duper important as recruiting.

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2010 8:01 am
by JTinKC
Not trying to be clever or anything. No real news is broke here. Its a great board for talking about things but when someone comes on here and asks, "has anyone heard or know anything about such and such" they basically are asking, "has anyone paid a subscription to Rivals/Scout/ESPN and have they read anything they said about how things are going?"

C4Qs is awesome. Lots of activity and lots of views, but one thing that DOESNT happen here is reporting and thats fine, so DT dont get all huffy and puffy about me saying what this place actually is.

I subscribe to Scout and I think it's hilarious how people bitch about having to pay but then bitch when no one comes racing over to post all the goodies and such.
I don't think the difference in time between what is broke on the pay sites vs when it makes it here justifies (in my mind) me paying for one of the other sites. I've payed for both of DT and ED and I'm happy with this board. I think these guys have a great site here.

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2010 8:40 am
by ljginger
I knew Tacoi Sumler was down to Oregon and Stanford...that's why I made that so called dumb comment...actually I just know my stuff!

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2010 8:44 am
by NCDucks09
Subscribe for recruiting news if you like paying for rumors. It's a racket. Nothing is a lock until national LOI day. Even then their are admissions red tape that can screw things up.

Rumors are fun and entertaining, but we can think up our own here on our board without paying for some info site that is 01% logic and 99% BS.

I remember one of those Scout Analyst's saying when I subscribed my one and only time, "Boyd is a 99% lock for Oregon." It's an infamous quote. Guy was straight up trying to stir up the bee's nest. No thank you.

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:27 am
by Duck07
karlhungis wrote:Yeah, it's funny how all of the guys that actually got us some recruiting info on their own have since been hired by pay sites.... Lord knows information shouldn't be free.
I understand the relationship between the recruiting sites, but I am ardently opposed to keep information from people. I don't believe anybody "owns" information, it should be available to all. To me, these post-visit reports are all the same

Recruit: I had a "insert synonym for awesome" time visiting Eugene and the facilities were "i.s.f.a." The fans were "i.s.f.a." and I had a "i.s.f.a" time.

The only real news is when a guy committs, at which point we play the waiting game until signing day.

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2010 2:29 pm
by jimmy12
Lock this thread-- it is officially worthless.