Oregon @ USC Thread

Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1

User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 37818
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Oregon @ USC Thread

Post by UOducksTK1 »

1. 342 Salim Stoudamire, ARIZ, 2002-05
2. 323 Stevin Smith, ASU, 1991-94
3. 318 Jason Gardner, ARIZ, 2000-03
4. 317 Jason Kapono, UCLA, 2000-03
5. 282 Orlando Williams, ORE, 1992-95
6. 273 *Tajuan Porter, ORE, 2006-
7. 272 Damon Stoudamire, ARIZ, 1992-95

bump.

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
duckgrad99
All Pac-12
Posts: 6092
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:33 pm
Location: San Diego

Re: Oregon @ USC Thread

Post by duckgrad99 »

UOducksTK1 wrote:1. 342 Salim Stoudamire, ARIZ, 2002-05
2. 323 Stevin Smith, ASU, 1991-94
3. 318 Jason Gardner, ARIZ, 2000-03
4. 317 Jason Kapono, UCLA, 2000-03
5. 282 Orlando Williams, ORE, 1992-95
6. 273 *Tajuan Porter, ORE, 2006-
7. 272 Damon Stoudamire, ARIZ, 1992-95

bump.

That's a very nice stat, although Porter is a one dimensional player.
Image
roth
One Star Recruit
Posts: 56
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:52 am

Re: Oregon @ USC Thread

Post by roth »

Look I never said that EK hasn't brought great things to Oregon basketball because he has. But what I am saying is AT THIS TIME it is easy to recruit to Oregon. I suppose what I should have said is after* this season it should be a lot easier to recruit because of the new arena. I suppose my central theme of my last post would have been that I totally disagree with EK's end of game strategy because TP isn't a closer like Brooks, Jackson, Ridinour or Jones were. I think it is time for a change in Eugene. EK has brought great things to eugene but it is time for a change.
User avatar
pudgejeff
Senior
Posts: 4904
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:21 am
GM: Sacramento Kings GM

Re: Oregon @ USC Thread

Post by pudgejeff »

I agree to a point duckgrad...I don't think it has to do with being better when TP is gone I think it has to do with being better when have a go to guy thats not him...If someone thats here becomes that or if we get Jamil and he becomes that I think TP is a huge asset because they have to focus on another player ala his freshmen year when he carried us through the NCAA tourney, He's a game changer but he's not a star and go to player.
User avatar
fpsduck
Senior
Posts: 2863
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 11:10 am

Re: Oregon @ USC Thread

Post by fpsduck »

Horrible implosion at the end of the game. :x
dthomas=ddixon
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 8214
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:42 pm
Location: McMinnville, Oregon

Re: Oregon @ USC Thread

Post by dthomas=ddixon »

pudgejeff wrote:I agree to a point duckgrad...I don't think it has to do with being better when TP is gone I think it has to do with being better when have a go to guy thats not him...If someone thats here becomes that or if we get Jamil and he becomes that I think TP is a huge asset because they have to focus on another player ala his freshmen year when he carried us through the NCAA tourney, He's a game changer but he's not a star and go to player.
Finally a basketball topic we can agree on. ;)

I personally love TP. He's doing the best he can for his stature & strength. I feel bad that he has to be "the guy" at times because he just can't be. Bring in or develop (I forgot, Ernie doesn't develop :twisted: ) another player to be the star of the team & TP is all of a sudden your best player, without actually having to be. Like his freshman year, he obviously wasn't the star player on the team but there were times when you coulda fooled me.
Image
User avatar
alabamaduck
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 868
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:56 pm
Location: Birmingham, Alabama

Re: Oregon @ USC Thread

Post by alabamaduck »

That's a great point Pudge...I don't think Porter's regressed like some of us would like to believe as much as he just shouldn't be THE guy. He's deadly behind the arc when he's on, but way too streaky and not good enough off the dribble to be the focus of an offense
Image
Post Reply