1. 342 Salim Stoudamire, ARIZ, 2002-05
2. 323 Stevin Smith, ASU, 1991-94
3. 318 Jason Gardner, ARIZ, 2000-03
4. 317 Jason Kapono, UCLA, 2000-03
5. 282 Orlando Williams, ORE, 1992-95
6. 273 *Tajuan Porter, ORE, 2006-
7. 272 Damon Stoudamire, ARIZ, 1992-95
bump.
Oregon @ USC Thread
Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1
- UOducksTK1
- Site Admin
- Posts: 37818
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
- GM: Boston Celtics GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
Re: Oregon @ USC Thread
Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
-
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 6092
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:33 pm
- Location: San Diego
Re: Oregon @ USC Thread
UOducksTK1 wrote:1. 342 Salim Stoudamire, ARIZ, 2002-05
2. 323 Stevin Smith, ASU, 1991-94
3. 318 Jason Gardner, ARIZ, 2000-03
4. 317 Jason Kapono, UCLA, 2000-03
5. 282 Orlando Williams, ORE, 1992-95
6. 273 *Tajuan Porter, ORE, 2006-
7. 272 Damon Stoudamire, ARIZ, 1992-95
bump.
That's a very nice stat, although Porter is a one dimensional player.
-
- One Star Recruit
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:52 am
Re: Oregon @ USC Thread
Look I never said that EK hasn't brought great things to Oregon basketball because he has. But what I am saying is AT THIS TIME it is easy to recruit to Oregon. I suppose what I should have said is after* this season it should be a lot easier to recruit because of the new arena. I suppose my central theme of my last post would have been that I totally disagree with EK's end of game strategy because TP isn't a closer like Brooks, Jackson, Ridinour or Jones were. I think it is time for a change in Eugene. EK has brought great things to eugene but it is time for a change.
- pudgejeff
- Senior
- Posts: 4904
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:21 am
- GM: Sacramento Kings GM
Re: Oregon @ USC Thread
I agree to a point duckgrad...I don't think it has to do with being better when TP is gone I think it has to do with being better when have a go to guy thats not him...If someone thats here becomes that or if we get Jamil and he becomes that I think TP is a huge asset because they have to focus on another player ala his freshmen year when he carried us through the NCAA tourney, He's a game changer but he's not a star and go to player.
- fpsduck
- Senior
- Posts: 2863
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 11:10 am
Re: Oregon @ USC Thread
Horrible implosion at the end of the game.
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 8214
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:42 pm
- Location: McMinnville, Oregon
Re: Oregon @ USC Thread
Finally a basketball topic we can agree on.pudgejeff wrote:I agree to a point duckgrad...I don't think it has to do with being better when TP is gone I think it has to do with being better when have a go to guy thats not him...If someone thats here becomes that or if we get Jamil and he becomes that I think TP is a huge asset because they have to focus on another player ala his freshmen year when he carried us through the NCAA tourney, He's a game changer but he's not a star and go to player.
I personally love TP. He's doing the best he can for his stature & strength. I feel bad that he has to be "the guy" at times because he just can't be. Bring in or develop (I forgot, Ernie doesn't develop ) another player to be the star of the team & TP is all of a sudden your best player, without actually having to be. Like his freshman year, he obviously wasn't the star player on the team but there were times when you coulda fooled me.
- alabamaduck
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 868
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:56 pm
- Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Re: Oregon @ USC Thread
That's a great point Pudge...I don't think Porter's regressed like some of us would like to believe as much as he just shouldn't be THE guy. He's deadly behind the arc when he's on, but way too streaky and not good enough off the dribble to be the focus of an offense