No clue. I don't understand why we are not rotating in our fast running backs. It makes no sense to just only run Freeman. He's good but he's not going to have any explosion plays and is not going to beat many guys to the outside. I don't get it.
Maybe they are worried about ball security? No idea.
hjpop wrote:I noticed something tonight. Why is it that we don't have the run to the sides anymore? It's sending the RBs up the middle again, even now.
Every game this year the RB rotation has been horrible, and they've just ran Freeman up the middle when we have playmakers who can take it to the edge and give freeman a rest.
They did run Freeman outside, he just had no blocking help. Maybe a faster scat back would have been a better option, but Frost didn't feel it necesary to use quicker backs on those runs. All coaching was terrible this game. You dont give up 60 plus points in 3 quarters of the game and have anything positive to say. We were the FBS team tonight.
So this week when we argued about creativity, Utah showed a ton and we didn't. Fake punts, fake punt returns, double passes, unique serts. We were SO out coached. Utah is a heavy run team and they almost exclusively passed the ball.
Sad thing is the FOX announcers are again saying the Ducks were out-physicalled. Why cant the Ducks shake that? Why can't they ever be called a physical team? What precludes them from being physical? Why must there always be that knock on the Ducks? By the way, they havent beaten too many 'physical' teams , so it must be a concern.
OregonFan4Life wrote:This is like watching Einstein in a chess match against a 5 year old with Down syndrome.
This is a classless, over the top offensive remark. Please find another hobby during football season! None of us should be subjected to your slew of lowlife comments especially this one since it has NOTHING to do with football.
At the very least, please reflect on what you write and make an effort to be polite and considerate of others, especially the disabled who are unable to defend themselves from such vitriol.
There is absolutely no room for such comments like this.
I edited the post, I'm sorry to you and anyone else I offended, that wasn't my intent.
Thank you.
May all of your future comments reflect this apology.
I'm already over this game (actually was probably over it by the 3rd quarter.) Oregon needs to get their QB situation sorted out, the line needs to develop some mean streak to avoid being blown up every play, and the defense needs to do something else completely. As much as I hate it, that graphic they showed of how teams do after losing a Heisman Trophy QB is basically what our expectations kind of have to be now.
Alan wrote:Our new starting QB Taylor Alie?..... Tongue in cheek for the most part, two games two rushing TD's
I was saying the same thing somewhat sarcastically after the game tonight, but truth is why not? Lockie has been average, and VA is even worse until he's back to 100%. As crazy as it sounds, you might as well.
