1997 Draft Discussion

All Draft related information will be here

Moderators: UOducksTK1, Zyme, lukeyrid13, Oregon Ownage

Post Reply
User avatar
offtheheezy
Senior
Posts: 2151
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 10:09 pm
GM: Vancouver Grizzlies

Re: 1997 Draft Discussion

Post by offtheheezy »

Gotta say, #6 was super unexpected :lol:
User avatar
pistolpetejr
Senior
Posts: 2965
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2014 2:48 pm
GM: Los Angeles Clippers

Re: 1997 Draft Discussion

Post by pistolpetejr »

I honestly didn’t see that coming either lol
---
Image

PistolPeteJR
JB
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 392
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2022 6:49 pm

Re: 1997 Draft Discussion

Post by JB »

SJax was fourth on our big board
Kings
User avatar
dd10snoop28
Senior
Posts: 4821
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:06 am
GM: New Jersey Nets GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: 1997 Draft Discussion

Post by dd10snoop28 »

JB wrote:SJax was fourth on our big board
no way.... maybe...maybe 5, but not 4. Billups notes r way better.
Image
JB
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 392
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2022 6:49 pm

Re: 1997 Draft Discussion

Post by JB »

dd10snoop28 wrote:
JB wrote:SJax was fourth on our big board
no way.... maybe...maybe 5, but not 4. Billups notes r way better.
I wanted to ask what OO could have possibly meant in his SJax notes, but I didn't want to tip my hand at who I wanted as I was trying to trade up.

But as I said earlier, I'm not really taking the notes into consideration outside of a few things I try to look for.
Kings
User avatar
offtheheezy
Senior
Posts: 2151
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 10:09 pm
GM: Vancouver Grizzlies

Re: 1997 Draft Discussion

Post by offtheheezy »

To each his own, but I honestly think you could’ve gotten SJax at 15
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 37818
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: 1997 Draft Discussion

Post by UOducksTK1 »

I was hoping to get SJax at 13, dang lol

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
User avatar
offtheheezy
Senior
Posts: 2151
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 10:09 pm
GM: Vancouver Grizzlies

Re: 1997 Draft Discussion

Post by offtheheezy »

Guess I was wrong :P
User avatar
vincent1469
Five Star Recruit
Posts: 1077
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 5:24 pm
GM: Seattle Supersonics

Re: 1997 Draft Discussion

Post by vincent1469 »

I think Stak ‘s case for 6 can also be that he likely has good tendencies to be a lead scorer compared to some of the guys that are still up there.
JB
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 392
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2022 6:49 pm

Re: 1997 Draft Discussion

Post by JB »

vincent1469 wrote:I think Stak ‘s case for 6 can also be that he likely has good tendencies to be a lead scorer compared to some of the guys that are still up there.
Unfortunately, our scouting department will be keeping our thought process close to the chest.
Kings
User avatar
jibbajabba614
Senior
Posts: 2410
Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 6:32 pm
GM: Milwaukee Bucks GM

Re: 1997 Draft Discussion

Post by jibbajabba614 »

If SJax gets the jump with defense at SG, I think it’s a solid pick.


I think next pick can be anyone in the top 15… I had SJax in top ten so not a far reach
User avatar
vincent1469
Five Star Recruit
Posts: 1077
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 5:24 pm
GM: Seattle Supersonics

Re: 1997 Draft Discussion

Post by vincent1469 »

jibbajabba614 wrote:If SJax gets the jump with defense at SG, I think it’s a solid pick.


I think next pick can be anyone in the top 15… I had SJax in top ten so not a far reach
Yeah with the parity of this draft there isn’t any reach that’s immensely far, its all in the eyes of the beholder.
User avatar
jibbajabba614
Senior
Posts: 2410
Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 6:32 pm
GM: Milwaukee Bucks GM

Re: 1997 Draft Discussion

Post by jibbajabba614 »

Alright I’m done messaging teams about deals. I hate when people don’t respond.

I probably messaged everyone and heard back from maybe half of them. No thanks goes a long way

Reason when I rebuild even if team never gave a yes but responded I usually do deal. Michael Cage to Jazz I think was a deal I made just because he actually responded.
JB
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 392
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2022 6:49 pm

Re: 1997 Draft Discussion

Post by JB »

jibbajabba614 wrote:If SJax gets the jump with defense at SG, I think it’s a solid pick.


I think next pick can be anyone in the top 15… I had SJax in top ten so not a far reach
If we get lucky, Jax could be the fourth best player in the class. If we get unlucky, he could be nothing. I'm in position to just take the player with the highest upside and hope for the best. If he busts, I don't have a contender anyway. If he hits, we go from a 0% chance at ever winning with my core to maybe a 1% chance. Lol

IMO he was like our one chance at maybe adding a third cool young player, so I was willing to take the risk of trading up to get him. There was no one else outside of the top 3 who interested me in the position my team is in. If I was within reach of competing, there would maybe be some other guys I would consider. But for us, it makes sense in my opinion.
Kings
User avatar
pistolpetejr
Senior
Posts: 2965
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2014 2:48 pm
GM: Los Angeles Clippers

Re: 1997 Draft Discussion

Post by pistolpetejr »

jibbajabba614 wrote:Alright I’m done messaging teams about deals. I hate when people don’t respond.

I probably messaged everyone and heard back from maybe half of them. No thanks goes a long way

Reason when I rebuild even if team never gave a yes but responded I usually do deal. Michael Cage to Jazz I think was a deal I made just because he actually responded.
Literally the thing I hate the most.
---
Image

PistolPeteJR
Post Reply