Page 4 of 9

Re: 1997 Draft Discussion

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2022 6:54 pm
by offtheheezy
Gotta say, #6 was super unexpected :lol:

Re: 1997 Draft Discussion

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2022 6:54 pm
by pistolpetejr
I honestly didn’t see that coming either lol

Re: 1997 Draft Discussion

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2022 7:01 pm
by JB
SJax was fourth on our big board

Re: 1997 Draft Discussion

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2022 7:04 pm
by dd10snoop28
JB wrote:SJax was fourth on our big board
no way.... maybe...maybe 5, but not 4. Billups notes r way better.

Re: 1997 Draft Discussion

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2022 7:06 pm
by JB
dd10snoop28 wrote:
JB wrote:SJax was fourth on our big board
no way.... maybe...maybe 5, but not 4. Billups notes r way better.
I wanted to ask what OO could have possibly meant in his SJax notes, but I didn't want to tip my hand at who I wanted as I was trying to trade up.

But as I said earlier, I'm not really taking the notes into consideration outside of a few things I try to look for.

Re: 1997 Draft Discussion

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2022 7:13 pm
by offtheheezy
To each his own, but I honestly think you could’ve gotten SJax at 15

Re: 1997 Draft Discussion

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2022 7:21 pm
by UOducksTK1
I was hoping to get SJax at 13, dang lol

Re: 1997 Draft Discussion

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2022 7:27 pm
by offtheheezy
Guess I was wrong :P

Re: 1997 Draft Discussion

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2022 7:39 pm
by vincent1469
I think Stak ‘s case for 6 can also be that he likely has good tendencies to be a lead scorer compared to some of the guys that are still up there.

Re: 1997 Draft Discussion

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2022 7:49 pm
by JB
vincent1469 wrote:I think Stak ‘s case for 6 can also be that he likely has good tendencies to be a lead scorer compared to some of the guys that are still up there.
Unfortunately, our scouting department will be keeping our thought process close to the chest.

Re: 1997 Draft Discussion

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2022 8:18 pm
by jibbajabba614
If SJax gets the jump with defense at SG, I think it’s a solid pick.


I think next pick can be anyone in the top 15… I had SJax in top ten so not a far reach

Re: 1997 Draft Discussion

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2022 8:47 pm
by vincent1469
jibbajabba614 wrote:If SJax gets the jump with defense at SG, I think it’s a solid pick.


I think next pick can be anyone in the top 15… I had SJax in top ten so not a far reach
Yeah with the parity of this draft there isn’t any reach that’s immensely far, its all in the eyes of the beholder.

Re: 1997 Draft Discussion

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2022 8:58 pm
by jibbajabba614
Alright I’m done messaging teams about deals. I hate when people don’t respond.

I probably messaged everyone and heard back from maybe half of them. No thanks goes a long way

Reason when I rebuild even if team never gave a yes but responded I usually do deal. Michael Cage to Jazz I think was a deal I made just because he actually responded.

Re: 1997 Draft Discussion

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:02 pm
by JB
jibbajabba614 wrote:If SJax gets the jump with defense at SG, I think it’s a solid pick.


I think next pick can be anyone in the top 15… I had SJax in top ten so not a far reach
If we get lucky, Jax could be the fourth best player in the class. If we get unlucky, he could be nothing. I'm in position to just take the player with the highest upside and hope for the best. If he busts, I don't have a contender anyway. If he hits, we go from a 0% chance at ever winning with my core to maybe a 1% chance. Lol

IMO he was like our one chance at maybe adding a third cool young player, so I was willing to take the risk of trading up to get him. There was no one else outside of the top 3 who interested me in the position my team is in. If I was within reach of competing, there would maybe be some other guys I would consider. But for us, it makes sense in my opinion.

Re: 1997 Draft Discussion

Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2022 5:33 am
by pistolpetejr
jibbajabba614 wrote:Alright I’m done messaging teams about deals. I hate when people don’t respond.

I probably messaged everyone and heard back from maybe half of them. No thanks goes a long way

Reason when I rebuild even if team never gave a yes but responded I usually do deal. Michael Cage to Jazz I think was a deal I made just because he actually responded.
Literally the thing I hate the most.