Tray Dub wrote:How can a long snapper win you a football game? Quick, name the last time a botched snap has lost us a game... Go ahead, think back for ten years. I sure as hell can't think of one. And even if you can think of one, who's to say the new guy will NEVER mess up?
If this is just an overreaction to the near-blunder at AZ, then I'm pissed. Palmer's been doing well all year and he's a RS freshman.
Good point but sometimes it only takes once...hell lets not stop there how about our center position we've had too many bad snaps this year.
And Dallas/Romo is the best recent example against your argument.
But like you we all want the best possible recruiting class with no wasted spots, so I completely understand why you said it.
Tray Dub wrote:How can a long snapper win you a football game? Quick, name the last time a botched snap has lost us a game... Go ahead, think back for ten years. I sure as hell can't think of one. And even if you can think of one, who's to say the new guy will NEVER mess up?
If this is just an overreaction to the near-blunder at AZ, then I'm pissed. Palmer's been doing well all year and he's a RS freshman.
Good point but sometimes it only takes once...hell lets not stop there how about our center position we've had too many bad snaps this year.
And Dallas/Romo is the best recent example against your argument.
But like you we all want the best possible recruiting class with no wasted spots, so I completely understand why you said it.
GO DUCKS!!
Thank you. I'm not trying to insult the kid, nor am I saying I know more about the coaches on recruiting, I'm just saying I don't see the logic behind offering a long snapper, no matter how good he is. Apparently that's blasphemy to some people.
