Page 4 of 5

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2010 2:49 pm
by UOducksTK1
JTinKC wrote:
Not trying to be clever or anything. No real news is broke here. Its a great board for talking about things but when someone comes on here and asks, "has anyone heard or know anything about such and such" they basically are asking, "has anyone paid a subscription to Rivals/Scout/ESPN and have they read anything they said about how things are going?"

C4Qs is awesome. Lots of activity and lots of views, but one thing that DOESNT happen here is reporting and thats fine, so DT dont get all huffy and puffy about me saying what this place actually is.

I subscribe to Scout and I think it's hilarious how people bitch about having to pay but then bitch when no one comes racing over to post all the goodies and such.
I don't think the difference in time between what is broke on the pay sites vs when it makes it here justifies (in my mind) me paying for one of the other sites. I've payed for both of DT and ED and I'm happy with this board. I think these guys have a great site here.
Thanks, appreciate it.

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2010 3:38 pm
by fecta23
Duck07 wrote:
karlhungis wrote:Yeah, it's funny how all of the guys that actually got us some recruiting info on their own have since been hired by pay sites.... Lord knows information shouldn't be free.
I understand the relationship between the recruiting sites, but I am ardently opposed to keep information from people. I don't believe anybody "owns" information, it should be available to all. To me, these post-visit reports are all the same

Recruit: I had a "insert synonym for awesome" time visiting Eugene and the facilities were "i.s.f.a." The fans were "i.s.f.a." and I had a "i.s.f.a" time.

The only real news is when a guy committs, at which point we play the waiting game until signing day.
Without the pay sites this info would never get out though because there would be no incentive for people to seek out the athletes and get the information. I mean sure there would be the occasional update but without the pay sites they would be far and between.

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2010 6:05 pm
by RanDux
Sure has been quiet since the game. I am surprised there hasn't been any news, even of how the recruits' trips went.

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2010 9:54 pm
by Lord_Vader
RanDux wrote:Sure has been quiet since the game. I am surprised there hasn't been any news, even of how the recruits' trips went.

Go to a pay site and read.

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:26 pm
by duckgrad99
Lord_Vader wrote:
RanDux wrote:Sure has been quiet since the game. I am surprised there hasn't been any news, even of how the recruits' trips went.

Go to a pay site and read.
Lighten up. Not everyone that has key information belongs to a pay site.

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2010 1:02 am
by UOducksTK1
RanDux wrote:Sure has been quiet since the game. I am surprised there hasn't been any news, even of how the recruits' trips went.
It usually takes about until Monday or Tuesday until we hear how the visits went.

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2010 1:35 am
by karlhungis
Putting 2 and 2 together here, but it sounds like Walls had a pretty good visit.

http://oregon.247sports.com/Board/45/Ju ... /1#a111279
Awesome Walls is a beast, and seems like a very quality character kid too.
Someone named UOducksTK1 :D posted that response to the article. So purely speculating here, but it sounds like we have a good shot at Walls.

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2010 7:59 am
by TriDuck
Did anybody else other than me see Greg Oden on DuckVision from the sideline? It looked like he was with some recruits, most likely the BB ones.

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2010 10:19 am
by dthomas=ddixon
TriDuck wrote:Did anybody else other than me see Greg Oden on DuckVision from the sideline? It looked like he was with some recruits, most likely the BB ones.
I saw Oden but couldn't tell who he was with. That'd be awespme if he was hanging with our bball recruits. Not sure why he would be & if thats even allowed though.

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2010 11:12 am
by duckgrad99

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2010 11:17 am
by JTinKC
Duck07 wrote:
karlhungis wrote:
Yeah, it's funny how all of the guys that actually got us some recruiting info on their own have since been hired by pay sites.... Lord knows information shouldn't be free.

I understand the relationship between the recruiting sites, but I am ardently opposed to keep information from people. I don't believe anybody "owns" information, it should be available to all. To me, these post-visit reports are all the same

Recruit: I had a "insert synonym for awesome" time visiting Eugene and the facilities were "i.s.f.a." The fans were "i.s.f.a." and I had a "i.s.f.a" time.

The only real news is when a guy committs, at which point we play the waiting game until signing day.


Without the pay sites this info would never get out though because there would be no incentive for people to seek out the athletes and get the information. I mean sure there would be the occasional update but without the pay sites they would be far and between.

How about the incentive of loving your team and being interested in knowing whats going on. How about after getting inside information being able to share that with other people who appreciate your effort and news. Great if you can turn a buck but I'm perfectly fine waiting for the official. The cruddy part is that until they actually sign it doesn't even matter. We should be grateful that we have people who have done a pretty good job putting together a site where we don't have to pay to come talk about our team. Otherwise I'd just be stuck over on CBS or something.

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2010 2:41 pm
by uostudent
Tacoi Sumler says that he is solid to Oregon, but might visit Stanford and South Carolina...

Oregon made Hakeem Flowers' top 5 along with Georgia Tech, LSU, Michigan, and UCLA. Nice to see that Miami, Oklahoma, and Notre Dame were eliminated.

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2010 4:31 pm
by fecta23
JTinKC wrote:
Duck07 wrote:
karlhungis wrote:
Yeah, it's funny how all of the guys that actually got us some recruiting info on their own have since been hired by pay sites.... Lord knows information shouldn't be free.

I understand the relationship between the recruiting sites, but I am ardently opposed to keep information from people. I don't believe anybody "owns" information, it should be available to all. To me, these post-visit reports are all the same

Recruit: I had a "insert synonym for awesome" time visiting Eugene and the facilities were "i.s.f.a." The fans were "i.s.f.a." and I had a "i.s.f.a" time.

The only real news is when a guy committs, at which point we play the waiting game until signing day.


Without the pay sites this info would never get out though because there would be no incentive for people to seek out the athletes and get the information. I mean sure there would be the occasional update but without the pay sites they would be far and between.

How about the incentive of loving your team and being interested in knowing whats going on. How about after getting inside information being able to share that with other people who appreciate your effort and news. Great if you can turn a buck but I'm perfectly fine waiting for the official. The cruddy part is that until they actually sign it doesn't even matter. We should be grateful that we have people who have done a pretty good job putting together a site where we don't have to pay to come talk about our team. Otherwise I'd just be stuck over on CBS or something.
Yeah that would work......

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2010 4:38 pm
by Elduderino
Man 07 hit the nail on the head on this one. Well said. Nothing bothers me more than the attempts at limiting information relay supposedly originating from the "pay sites".

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2010 10:33 pm
by UOducksTK1
karlhungis wrote:Putting 2 and 2 together here, but it sounds like Walls had a pretty good visit.

http://oregon.247sports.com/Board/45/Ju ... /1#a111279
Awesome Walls is a beast, and seems like a very quality character kid too.
Someone named UOducksTK1 :D posted that response to the article. So purely speculating here, but it sounds like we have a good shot at Walls.
Ha, I'm just helping out over there as a moderator. I'm not disappearing, don't worry.

I talked to him briefly today actually, and he loved the visit. For any of your facebook creepers, he has some cool pictures from his visit if you guys want to check it out.

According to scout.com, he's visiting Cal this weekend. Go Bruins!!