2003 Draft Board (LIVE)

Satah · Post by **Satah** » Wed Sep 23, 2015 2:08 pm

dave wrote:Anyone interested in my first?

I do!

Satah · Post by **Satah** » Wed Sep 23, 2015 2:10 pm

dave

Check your pm

Marzeial · Post by **Marzeial** » Wed Sep 23, 2015 2:26 pm

I'll take it for my 2nd

dave · Post by **dave** » Wed Sep 23, 2015 4:09 pm

Cavs Select Luke Walton

stylesofpunk · Post by **stylesofpunk** » Wed Sep 23, 2015 4:22 pm

dave wrote:Cavs Select Luke Walton

Dammit. With the 28the pick in the 2003 nba draft the Toronto Raptors select ZaZa Pachulia

dave · Post by **dave** » Wed Sep 23, 2015 5:10 pm

This is a curious draft. I could see some late first round picks turning out better than lotto picks.

pudgejeff · Post by **pudgejeff** » Wed Sep 23, 2015 5:25 pm

dave wrote:This is a curious draft. I could see some late first round picks turning out better than lotto picks.

I wish I had the insight you guys that have done this a lot do!

stylesofpunk · Post by **stylesofpunk** » Wed Sep 23, 2015 6:37 pm

Hope the live draft starts at like 1030 est because I'm at work until 10 ad I have 2 of the 1st 3 picks in round two

Satah · Post by **Satah** » Wed Sep 23, 2015 6:45 pm

dd10snoop28

Check your pm

dave · Post by **dave** » Wed Sep 23, 2015 6:51 pm

pudgejeff wrote:
dave wrote:This is a curious draft. I could see some late first round picks turning out better than lotto picks.
I wish I had the insight you guys that have done this a lot do!

For me I tend to look at their ratings and compare to notes. I graded out Lampe being pretty high but his potential could be crap and be a total bust. Then there are curious cases of Warrick who entered the draft well before he did in real life. Does that mean he has more potential?

I also think player's positions have a large impact on TC. SG vs SF, SF vs PF. I think TC focuses more on certain attributes for different positions. If I had Lampe for instance I'd move him to PF instead of keeping him at SF to hopefully develop his inside, strength, and rebounding.

stylesofpunk · Post by **stylesofpunk** » Wed Sep 23, 2015 7:29 pm

cant get into chat

Zyme · Post by **Zyme** » Wed Sep 23, 2015 7:29 pm

dave wrote:
pudgejeff wrote:
dave wrote:This is a curious draft. I could see some late first round picks turning out better than lotto picks.
I wish I had the insight you guys that have done this a lot do!
For me I tend to look at their ratings and compare to notes. I graded out Lampe being pretty high but his potential could be crap and be a total bust. Then there are curious cases of Warrick who entered the draft well before he did in real life. Does that mean he has more potential?

I also think player's positions have a large impact on TC. SG vs SF, SF vs PF. I think TC focuses more on certain attributes for different positions. If I had Lampe for instance I'd move him to PF instead of keeping him at SF to hopefully develop his inside, strength, and rebounding.

If you want a good example of that go look at the first draft.

Brophdog88 · Post by **Brophdog88** » Wed Sep 23, 2015 8:01 pm

dave wrote:
pudgejeff wrote:
dave wrote:This is a curious draft. I could see some late first round picks turning out better than lotto picks.
I wish I had the insight you guys that have done this a lot do!
For me I tend to look at their ratings and compare to notes. I graded out Lampe being pretty high but his potential could be crap and be a total bust. Then there are curious cases of Warrick who entered the draft well before he did in real life. Does that mean he has more potential?

I also think player's positions have a large impact on TC. SG vs SF, SF vs PF. I think TC focuses more on certain attributes for different positions. If I had Lampe for instance I'd move him to PF instead of keeping him at SF to hopefully develop his inside, strength, and rebounding.

Outside PF's never develop, much rather have Lampe at SF

dave · Post by **dave** » Wed Sep 23, 2015 8:26 pm

Brophdog88 wrote:
dave wrote:
pudgejeff wrote:
dave wrote:This is a curious draft. I could see some late first round picks turning out better than lotto picks.
I wish I had the insight you guys that have done this a lot do!
For me I tend to look at their ratings and compare to notes. I graded out Lampe being pretty high but his potential could be crap and be a total bust. Then there are curious cases of Warrick who entered the draft well before he did in real life. Does that mean he has more potential?

I also think player's positions have a large impact on TC. SG vs SF, SF vs PF. I think TC focuses more on certain attributes for different positions. If I had Lampe for instance I'd move him to PF instead of keeping him at SF to hopefully develop his inside, strength, and rebounding.
Outside PF's never develop, much rather have Lampe at SF

Is he really an outside player?

Satah · Post by **Satah** » Wed Sep 23, 2015 10:04 pm

Kings select TJ Ford

2003 Draft Board (LIVE)

Re: 2003 Draft Board (Mavs up)

Re: 2003 Draft Board (Cavs up)

Re: 2003 Draft Board (Cavs up)

Re: 2003 Draft Board (Cavs up)

Re: 2003 Draft Board (Cavs up)

Re: 2003 Draft Board (Bucks up)

Re: 2003 Draft Board (Bucks up)

Re: 2003 Draft Board (Bucks up)

Re: 2003 Draft Board (Bucks up)

Re: 2003 Draft Board (Bucks up)

Re: 2003 Draft Board (Bucks up)

Re: 2003 Draft Board (Bucks up)

Re: 2003 Draft Board (Bucks up)

Re: 2003 Draft Board (Bucks up)

Re: 2003 Draft Board (LIVE)