Re: 1998 Draft Discussion
Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2022 11:09 am
Fairdd10snoop28 wrote:he probably will thrive @ sf is why I think it's a steal
Oregon Ducks Sports Message Board Forum
https://ducksattack.com/forum/
Fairdd10snoop28 wrote:he probably will thrive @ sf is why I think it's a steal
That’s what I’m thinking / hoping to move him to SFjibbajabba614 wrote:Slava’s a good pickup if he can play SF. I think he was more of a big in 1.0
Honestly whenever dealing with an A potential guy it’s a crapshoot reason there’s so manyvincent1469 wrote:Traded up specifically for Jerome James. Happy with that pick.
2nd rounders with no bio written ignore the shown potential as it has little correlation with the true potjibbajabba614 wrote:Honestly whenever dealing with an A potential guy it’s a crapshoot reason there’s so manyvincent1469 wrote:Traded up specifically for Jerome James. Happy with that pick.
Is there any reason to think this? I'd find it incredibly misleading if it were the case, especially since there are plenty of real-life players that don't get notes. Even a fake player with A potential had seemingly good potential (Tornopsky in this case).Zyme wrote:2nd rounders with no bio written ignore the shown potential as it has little correlation with the true potjibbajabba614 wrote:Honestly whenever dealing with an A potential guy it’s a crapshoot reason there’s so manyvincent1469 wrote:Traded up specifically for Jerome James. Happy with that pick.
Agreed. It does seem to be a very deep draft though, as I'd find it hard to argue that anyone that went above him shouldn't have.UOducksTK1 wrote:Mobley dropped further than I imagined.