Page 5 of 8

Re: 1998 Draft Discussion

Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2022 11:09 am
by Craig
dd10snoop28 wrote:he probably will thrive @ sf is why I think it's a steal
Fair

Re: 1998 Draft Discussion

Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2022 11:11 am
by lukeyrid13
There’s still a couple guys I like left.

Willing to swap 30 for one of these next picks if anyone wants to save some salary

Re: 1998 Draft Discussion

Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2022 12:08 pm
by Cellar-door
Might be a bit here, I'm trying to work out a deal with my cap space before this pick takes up part of it. Have something in process but it might need multiple moves to work.

Re: 1998 Draft Discussion

Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2022 1:20 pm
by Oregon Ownage
Files have been updated

Re: 1998 Draft Discussion

Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2022 3:37 pm
by jibbajabba614
Love the Kutluay pick. I would have taken at 20

Re: 1998 Draft Discussion

Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2022 5:18 pm
by lukeyrid13
3hours?

Re: 1998 Draft Discussion

Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2022 8:25 pm
by Skyhooker
We should do speed round during 2nd round.
1 hr limit

Re: 1998 Draft Discussion

Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2022 8:28 pm
by jibbajabba614
Slava’s a good pickup if he can play SF. I think he was more of a big in 1.0

Re: 1998 Draft Discussion

Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2022 8:46 pm
by vincent1469
Traded up specifically for Jerome James. Happy with that pick.

Re: 1998 Draft Discussion

Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2022 8:51 pm
by lukeyrid13
jibbajabba614 wrote:Slava’s a good pickup if he can play SF. I think he was more of a big in 1.0
That’s what I’m thinking / hoping to move him to SF

Re: 1998 Draft Discussion

Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2022 9:37 pm
by jibbajabba614
vincent1469 wrote:Traded up specifically for Jerome James. Happy with that pick.
Honestly whenever dealing with an A potential guy it’s a crapshoot reason there’s so many

Re: 1998 Draft Discussion

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 7:09 am
by Zyme
jibbajabba614 wrote:
vincent1469 wrote:Traded up specifically for Jerome James. Happy with that pick.
Honestly whenever dealing with an A potential guy it’s a crapshoot reason there’s so many
2nd rounders with no bio written ignore the shown potential as it has little correlation with the true pot

Re: 1998 Draft Discussion

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 10:42 am
by UOducksTK1
Mobley dropped further than I imagined.

Re: 1998 Draft Discussion

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 10:49 am
by The Bean Regime
Zyme wrote:
jibbajabba614 wrote:
vincent1469 wrote:Traded up specifically for Jerome James. Happy with that pick.
Honestly whenever dealing with an A potential guy it’s a crapshoot reason there’s so many
2nd rounders with no bio written ignore the shown potential as it has little correlation with the true pot
Is there any reason to think this? I'd find it incredibly misleading if it were the case, especially since there are plenty of real-life players that don't get notes. Even a fake player with A potential had seemingly good potential (Tornopsky in this case).

Re: 1998 Draft Discussion

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 10:50 am
by The Bean Regime
UOducksTK1 wrote:Mobley dropped further than I imagined.
Agreed. It does seem to be a very deep draft though, as I'd find it hard to argue that anyone that went above him shouldn't have.