He's a 4 star in state recruit at a position of need. It's just a bonus that his brother is already on the team.ifuwant2 wrote:Ok. I just have to make an observation that has nothing to do with the Winston's per se, but just because one brother is worth a scholarship does not mean the other brother is worth one. I see people saying, "well, I like his brother, so I'm all for bringing in the other brother."
I want the best players willing to quack at every position. Don't care who your brother is. You ain't your brother.
Ring ring ring
Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1
-
karlhungis
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 7990
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:08 am
Re: Ring ring ring
OregonFan4life -
My source just said Chip is officially back!
It will be announced at Autzen press conference tomorrow afternoon!
My source just said Chip is officially back!
It will be announced at Autzen press conference tomorrow afternoon!
-
Juice
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 685
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:19 am
- Location: Seattle
Re: Ring ring ring
Well if they are saying that word for word, then I get your point, but I think most people are saying that because he's supposed to be better than LaMar. So if one brother is worth a scholarship and the other is supposed to be better then yes he is worth it.karlhungis wrote:He's a 4 star in state recruit at a position of need. It's just a bonus that his brother is already on the team.ifuwant2 wrote:Ok. I just have to make an observation that has nothing to do with the Winston's per se, but just because one brother is worth a scholarship does not mean the other brother is worth one. I see people saying, "well, I like his brother, so I'm all for bringing in the other brother."
I want the best players willing to quack at every position. Don't care who your brother is. You ain't your brother.
-
CanadianQuackers
- Two Star Recruit
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2017 7:07 am
Re: Ring ring ring
I think ifuwant2 is trying to allude to Schooler and how because he’s on our team that it was therefore imperative that we offer because we could all see the writing on the wall of the guy who had sub par coverage skills and had his own whiffs on tackles. Leading tackler on pretty much the worst defence means nothing to me personally. Somebody has to lead those stats. Like for me the older Schooler has shown me nothing indicative of not even questioning to offer his brother.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Phenom
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 9914
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:49 am
Re: Ring ring ring
Pretty sure they offered before the year.jimmy12 wrote:They held back an offer until they saw growth this year. (and they saw massive growth). He is a player that will red shirt likely and be a beast in years 3-4.