Re: Ducks Transfer Portal - 2024-25
Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2024 11:55 am
World is visiting Ducks. Will decide shortly between Oregon, Nebraska, Texas A&M.
Oregon Ducks Sports Message Board Forum
https://ducksattack.com/forum/
webfoots2001 wrote: Tue Dec 17, 2024 11:40 amPer The Oregonian snap counts (which do not include special teams) and GoDucks.com defensive statsStevensTechU wrote:You have a very loose definition of "bagging on" if you think my questioning of why a single player gets 95% of the snaps when the first three guys on the depth chart have comparable talent and room for growth.webfoots2001 wrote: Mon Dec 16, 2024 9:41 pmTo be fair, Tuioti is a half a sack behind JT Tuimoloau, the second most overrated player in the conference, who was voted as first team ahead of Uiagalelei.buckmarkduck wrote: Jack Sawyer is terrible. Most overrated player in the big. Vs Connelly he had no stats, and I didn’t even know he was on the field
I just felt it weird that STU has repeatedly bagged on Tuioti for some weird reason.
Unfortunately, I do wonder if there's a 'coach's kid' situation happening here and that's why we're seeing a concentration of guys at one position hit the portal.
Tuioti has played 568 snaps and has 54 total tackles, 6.5 TFL, 5.5 sacks, and 5 QBH
Winston has played 244 snaps and has 8 tackles, 0 TFL, 0 sacks, and 0 QBH
Seems like one player has been far more effective no matter who their father is. It also would seem strange that a maniac like Lanning would let a position coach give preference to any player if they looked poor on film compared to other players.
That's really good data. Could you add Jaedon Moore and Blake Purchase, just to complete the look?webfoots2001 wrote: Tue Dec 17, 2024 11:40 am
Tuioti has played 568 snaps and has 54 total tackles, 6.5 TFL, 5.5 sacks, and 5 QBH
Winston has played 244 snaps and has 8 tackles, 0 TFL, 0 sacks, and 0 QBH
Seems like one player has been far more effective no matter who their father is. It also would seem strange that a maniac like Lanning would let a position coach give preference to any player if they looked poor on film compared to other players.
Moore had 104 snaps, 6 tackles, 1 TFL, .5 sacks, 2 QBHStevensTechU wrote:That's really good data. Could you add Jaedon Moore and Blake Purchase, just to complete the look?webfoots2001 wrote: Tue Dec 17, 2024 11:40 am
Tuioti has played 568 snaps and has 54 total tackles, 6.5 TFL, 5.5 sacks, and 5 QBH
Winston has played 244 snaps and has 8 tackles, 0 TFL, 0 sacks, and 0 QBH
Seems like one player has been far more effective no matter who their father is. It also would seem strange that a maniac like Lanning would let a position coach give preference to any player if they looked poor on film compared to other players.
Winston, specifically, lined up in a lot of different positions, including defensive tackle. He's better in coverage than Tuioti, and neither would I say is a great pass rusher (yet) despite benefiting from the double teams going the way of Harmon, Matayo and Burch.
That’s fine, and true for basically every position on the team especially at DB and WR where they used the same group nearly the entire season outside of garbage time. There’s also the issue of redshirt status. Purchase went from playing in every game last season to only four prior to the championship game this year. That appears to be intentional by the specific number.StevensTechU wrote:For clarity, per 500 snaps:
Tuioti: 47.5 tackles, 5.7 TFL, 4.8 sacks, 4.4 QBH
Purchase: 27.8 tackles, 6.9 TFL, 6.9 sacks, 0 QBH
Moore: 28.8 tackles, 4.8 TFL, 2.4 sacks, 9.6 QBH
Winston: 16.4 tackles, 0 TFL, 0 sacks, 0 QBH
This doesn't really move me off of my thinking that multiple guys deserve playing time to develop.
To be clear, by year's end, it was pushing 90/10. In the conference championship, Tuioti had 52 plays and Purchase/Moore/Winston had a combined 5 (2, 2, and 1) (90/10). In the regular season finale, it was 35 for Tuioti to 16 combined for the other three (70/30). And as far as per play stats, tackles yes but 'havoc' no.webfoots2001 wrote: Tue Dec 17, 2024 2:44 pm
The fact is it wasn’t anywhere near close to being a 90/10 rotation at the OLB spot and the per play stats prove they were playing the most productive player at the position 2/3rds of the time.
To be even clearer, the Oregonian article states that there were 58 defensive snaps in the Washington game, and Tuioti played 35 of them. That's almost exactly 60%, which left 40% for backups. The championship game, also per the Oregonian, saw the defense playing 76 snaps, Tuioti played 52 of those, or 68.4%. Neither of those is anywhere near 90%.StevensTechU wrote: Tue Dec 17, 2024 3:21 pmTo be clear, by year's end, it was pushing 90/10. In the conference championship, Tuioti had 52 plays and Purchase/Moore/Winston had a combined 5 (2, 2, and 1) (90/10). In the regular season finale, it was 35 for Tuioti to 16 combined for the other three (70/30). And as far as per play stats, tackles yes but 'havoc' no.webfoots2001 wrote: Tue Dec 17, 2024 2:44 pm
The fact is it wasn’t anywhere near close to being a 90/10 rotation at the OLB spot and the per play stats prove they were playing the most productive player at the position 2/3rds of the time.
We can absolutely disagree on this. I understand why you'd limit the rotation at Matayo, Burch, and Harmon's spots, but I'm a little bit disappointed by the lack of rotation at the other edge spot, as well as in the defensive backfield this season.
Alex Harkey is also visiting Oregon.UOducksTK1 wrote: Tue Dec 17, 2024 11:55 am World is visiting Ducks. Will decide shortly between Oregon, Nebraska, Texas A&M.