Re: #20 Oregon @ #12 USC (Sept 26, Sat 4:30 PM NBC)
Posted: Sat Sep 26, 2026 5:39 pm
Man, getting Raiola might save our season.
Oregon Ducks Sports Message Board Forum
https://ducksattack.com/forum/
dthomas=ddixon wrote: Sat Sep 26, 2026 5:34 pmIt’s objectively true. Would Moore have smashed his head against the turf if he hadn’t slid and instead was tackled normally? The slide put the player in an objectively more vulnerable position where any contact sends the back of their head smashing into the ground.TroutdaleDuck wrote: Sat Sep 26, 2026 5:31 pmThat's not true at all. It works out most of the time and this was a rare occasion where it was a hit with ill intent.dthomas=ddixon wrote: Sat Sep 26, 2026 5:25 pm The QB slide is the dumbest rule ever made. It seriously injures more QBs than normal tackles ever did. Defenders are never going to pull up and not hit the QB.
The defender is still guilty of a cheap shot and should’ve pulled up but the slide hurts QBs brains way more than a normal tackle.
This is an illegal hit that rarely happens and that's what the problem is.dthomas=ddixon wrote: Sat Sep 26, 2026 5:34 pmIt’s objectively true. Would Moore have smashed his head against the turf if he hadn’t slid and instead was tackled normally? The slide put the player in an objectively more vulnerable position where any contact sends the back of their head smashing into the ground.TroutdaleDuck wrote: Sat Sep 26, 2026 5:31 pmThat's not true at all. It works out most of the time and this was a rare occasion where it was a hit with ill intent.dthomas=ddixon wrote: Sat Sep 26, 2026 5:25 pm The QB slide is the dumbest rule ever made. It seriously injures more QBs than normal tackles ever did. Defenders are never going to pull up and not hit the QB.
The defender is still guilty of a cheap shot and should’ve pulled up but the slide hurts QBs brains way more than a normal tackle.
It happens every week. The slide sets up QBs for cheap shots that result in the very worst thing that can happen to your brain: having the back of your head smashed into the ground.TroutdaleDuck wrote: Sat Sep 26, 2026 5:42 pmdthomas=ddixon wrote: Sat Sep 26, 2026 5:34 pmIt’s objectively true. Would Moore have smashed his head against the turf if he hadn’t slid and instead was tackled normally? The slide put the player in an objectively more vulnerable position where any contact sends the back of their head smashing into the ground.TroutdaleDuck wrote: Sat Sep 26, 2026 5:31 pmThat's not true at all. It works out most of the time and this was a rare occasion where it was a hit with ill intent.dthomas=ddixon wrote: Sat Sep 26, 2026 5:25 pm The QB slide is the dumbest rule ever made. It seriously injures more QBs than normal tackles ever did. Defenders are never going to pull up and not hit the QB.
The defender is still guilty of a cheap shot and should’ve pulled up but the slide hurts QBs brains way more than a normal tackle.This is an illegal hit that rarely happens and that's what the problem is.dthomas=ddixon wrote: Sat Sep 26, 2026 5:34 pmIt’s objectively true. Would Moore have smashed his head against the turf if he hadn’t slid and instead was tackled normally? The slide put the player in an objectively more vulnerable position where any contact sends the back of their head smashing into the ground.TroutdaleDuck wrote: Sat Sep 26, 2026 5:31 pmThat's not true at all. It works out most of the time and this was a rare occasion where it was a hit with ill intent.dthomas=ddixon wrote: Sat Sep 26, 2026 5:25 pm The QB slide is the dumbest rule ever made. It seriously injures more QBs than normal tackles ever did. Defenders are never going to pull up and not hit the QB.
The defender is still guilty of a cheap shot and should’ve pulled up but the slide hurts QBs brains way more than a normal tackle.
I was going to say I miss Thieneman and Perich is no Thieneman…not even close
Its free. You get what you pay for?TroutdaleDuck wrote: Sat Sep 26, 2026 5:47 pm For goodness sakes.Time for a new mod on here. Your mod thomas=ddixon Is literally arguing the rule is the problem and not the USC hit. Huge mistake signing up here today. Please ban and delete my account and save me some time. I'm done commenting on here.
Sorry dude, it’s an free anonymous message board. I’m allowed to disagree with people. We all do it on here.TroutdaleDuck wrote: Sat Sep 26, 2026 5:47 pm For goodness sakes.Time for a new mod on here. Your mod thomas=ddixon Is literally arguing the rule is the problem and not the USC hit. Huge mistake signing up here today. Please ban and delete my account and save me some time. I'm done commenting on here.
I mean, he wasn't saying it from a position of authority. Seems like you should accept opposing opinions without rage quitting. Yeesh.TroutdaleDuck wrote: Sat Sep 26, 2026 5:47 pm For goodness sakes.Time for a new mod on here. Your mod thomas=ddixon Is literally arguing the rule is the problem and not the USC hit. Huge mistake signing up here today. Please ban and delete my account and save me some time. I'm done commenting on here.