Ducks Attack Message Board Forum

BIG 12 (6-1)
Loses to: Big East
Wins against: PAC-12 (3), BIG 10 (2), ACC


SEC (6-3)
Loses to: BIG 10 , Big East, SEC
Wins against: BIG 10 (2), ACC (2), BIG 12, SEC


Conference USA (4-1)
Loses to: Independent
Wins against: BIG 10, WAC, Sun Belt, Big East


MAC (4-1)
Losses to: BIG 10
Wins against: MWC (2), WAC, Sun Belt


BIG 10 (4-6)
Loses to: PAC-12, SEC (2), C-USA , BIG 12 (2)
Wins against: SEC, PAC-12, MAC, ACC


Big East (3-2)
Loses to: ACC, C-USA
Wins against: SEC, BIG 12, ACC


MWC (2-3)
Loses to: MAC (2), Sun Belt
Wins against: PAC-12, WAC


PAC 12 (2-5)
Loses to: BIG 12 (3), BIG 10, MWC
Wins against: BIG 10, ACC


ACC (2-6)
Loses to: SEC (2), PAC-12, BIG 12, BIG 10, BIG EAST
Wins against: Independents, Big East


Independents (1-1)
Loses to: ACC
Wins against: C-USA


Sun Belt (1-2)
Loses to: C-USA, MAC
Wins against: MWC


WAC (0-3)
Loses to: C-USA, MWC, MAC
Wins against:

I don't care. I only root for other teams in the conference to bolster our BCS ratings. Now that we're in bowl season I couldn't care less as long as we win ours.

Tedford's boys were an embarrassment... And I don't mean, "of riches".

I couldn't believe they were discussing how well Maynard managed games earlier in the season at the same time he was diving to the ground in the last 2 minutes of the game, instead of trying for the sideline, to stop the clock.

That PF on the Kal DT, when the team had just stopped the long pass play late in the game, was classic.

Pac-12 is terrible, no shock this year. Stanford, USC, and Oregon are the only good teams. And USC isn't even in any bowls, so that sucks.

...and Stanford has the worst matchup possible for them.

lukeyrid13 wrote:...and Stanford has the worst matchup possible for them.

Oregon's the Pac-12's only hope.

Obi wan to yoda-no, their's another.

nehalem wrote:Obi wan to yoda-no, their's another.

UOducksTK1 wrote:Pac-12 is terrible, no shock this year. Stanford, USC, and Oregon are the only good teams. And USC isn't even in any bowls, so that sucks.

Really is a BAD year for y’all. Hopefully things will start to turn around next year.

Soooo……the Big 12 absolutely owned the PAC and the Big 10. The SEC had a respectful showing beating teams from the Big 12, Big 10, ACC, and securing another Natty (which ironically ends our undefeated streak at 9-1). C-USA was probably the biggest surprised beating two BCS conferences and going 4-1. The MAC looked impressive against mediocre opponents. The Big 10 sucked it. The Big East did a lot better than I expected. The MWC did well. The PAC got their asses handed to them along with the ACC. The indes split their 2 and the Sun Belt did slightly better that the WAC seeing that they won 1 of their three as the WAC is the only conference to get end the bowl season without a win.

Bud Lee wrote:Soooo……the Big 12 absolutely owned the PAC and the Big 10. The SEC had a respectful showing beating teams from the Big 12, Big 10, ACC, and securing another Natty (which ironically ends our undefeated streak at 9-1). C-USA was probably the biggest surprised beating two BCS conferences and going 4-1. The MAC looked impressive against mediocre opponents. The Big 10 sucked it. The Big East did a lot better than I expected. The MWC did well. The PAC got their asses handed to them along with the ACC. The indes split their 2 and the Sun Belt did slightly better that the WAC seeing that they won 1 of their three as the WAC is the only conference to get end the bowl season without a win.

Meh. If USC wasn't punished so severely (and unjustly according to tOSU sanctions) they would have played in either the Alamo or Fiesta. Even if SC plays the Alamo, they beat Baylor, Washington beats Texas and suddenly that porous showing doesn't look so bad.

Meh. If USC wasn't punished so severely (and unjustly according to tOSU sanctions) they would have played in either the Alamo or Fiesta. Even if SC plays the Alamo, they beat Baylor, Washington beats Texas and suddenly that porous showing doesn't look so bad.

Well.....you mean they might of beating Baylor….and assuming Washington gets Texas they might of been able to do what Cal could not....BUT....both could of gone and the results could of remained the same.

Bud Lee wrote:

Meh. If USC wasn't punished so severely (and unjustly according to tOSU sanctions) they would have played in either the Alamo or Fiesta. Even if SC plays the Alamo, they beat Baylor, Washington beats Texas and suddenly that porous showing doesn't look so bad.

Well.....you mean they might of beating Baylor….and assuming Washington gets Texas they might of been able to do what Cal could not....BUT....both could of gone and the results could of remained the same.

Sorry, not impressed by either Baylor or Texas, not that I was impressed with UW but in a game against UT, I'm sorry, the poodles would have destroyed Manny Diaz' defense, especially considering just how inept that UT O is. Hey, maybe they can expect another 5* RB to be their savior again though.