Seahawks

RanDux · Post by **RanDux** » Fri Aug 24, 2012 9:02 pm

Looks like the Seahawks might have a QB controversy. Russell Wilson lit it up tonight.

oregontrack · Post by **oregontrack** » Fri Aug 24, 2012 10:07 pm

no controversy at all. wilson's the guy.

Duck24 · Post by **Duck24** » Sat Aug 25, 2012 12:43 am

It's the pre-season, don't get too excited. Ryan Leaf looked great in his first pre-season games. Not saying he didn't look impressive, but do it against first stringers all season long.

USUaggieDuck · Post by **USUaggieDuck** » Sat Aug 25, 2012 1:00 am

Kc sat their starting DBs. But I'm all Wilson.

Sent from my iPad

oregontrack · Post by **oregontrack** » Sat Aug 25, 2012 8:38 am

Duck24 wrote:It's the pre-season, don't get too excited. Ryan Leaf looked great in his first pre-season games. Not saying he didn't look impressive, but do it against first stringers all season long.

... what. no one said he's the next john elway, i'm just saying there's no controversy. he will start the 2012 for the seattle seahawks. to go with flynn at this point would undermine everything pete carroll has preached since coming to the pacific northwest.

oregontrack · Post by **oregontrack** » Sat Aug 25, 2012 9:01 am

USUaggieDuck wrote:Kc sat their starting DBs. But I'm all Wilson.

Sent from my iPad

i'm not sure that's true. i saw berry and routt.

USUaggieDuck · Post by **USUaggieDuck** » Sat Aug 25, 2012 9:14 am

oregontrack wrote:
USUaggieDuck wrote:Kc sat their starting DBs. But I'm all Wilson.

Sent from my iPad
i'm not sure that's true. i saw berry and routt.

Brandon flowers and Kendrick Lewis were out with injuries.

Sent from my iPad

oregontrack · Post by **oregontrack** » Sat Aug 25, 2012 10:41 am

ah. i knew i hadn't seen flowers, but the way you wrote that made it seem like kansas city played backups at all four spots back there.

oh well, we played TO. that's probably a wash.

USUaggieDuck · Post by **USUaggieDuck** » Sat Aug 25, 2012 11:04 am

oregontrack wrote:ah. i knew i hadn't seen flowers, but the way you wrote that made it seem like kansas city played backups at all four spots back there.

oh well, we played TO. that's probably a wash.

lol how did TO do? I watched at bww but really only paid attention to turbin. So glad they have TVs at the urinal or I'd miss his td

Sent from my iPad

buckmarkduck · Post by **buckmarkduck** » Sat Aug 25, 2012 11:15 am

USUaggieDuck wrote:Kc sat their starting DBs. But I'm all Wilson.

Sent from my iPad

So Eric Berry doesn start for KC now?

oregontrack · Post by **oregontrack** » Sat Aug 25, 2012 1:10 pm

USUaggieDuck wrote:
oregontrack wrote:ah. i knew i hadn't seen flowers, but the way you wrote that made it seem like kansas city played backups at all four spots back there.

oh well, we played TO. that's probably a wash.
lol how did TO do? I watched at bww but really only paid attention to turbin. So glad they have TVs at the urinal or I'd miss his td

Sent from my iPad

essentially useless. by the same logic that pete carroll needs to start wilson to justify his competition-is-everything mantra, TO really shouldn't make the 53 man roster. a 1-2-3 of sydney rice, braylon edwards, and doug baldwin will do just fine. especially with tight ends like miller and winslow around.

turbin was fantastic. i think he's the perfect counterpunch to lynch. both he and bobby wagner are going to be big parts of this organization going forward. kj wright/wagner are going to make for a devastating linebacker tandem for years.

USUaggieDuck · Post by **USUaggieDuck** » Sat Aug 25, 2012 1:16 pm

buckmarkduck wrote:
USUaggieDuck wrote:Kc sat their starting DBs. But I'm all Wilson.

Sent from my iPad

So Eric Berry doesn start for KC now?

Did you not read where i say the two who didn't start? Would our defense be as good if we left in one starter?

Posted from my Android

Duck07 · Post by **Duck07** » Sat Aug 25, 2012 2:04 pm

TO doesn't need to be on this team, not when Braylon Edwards is playing like he is. Wilson looks like he's not overwhelmed out there and he also seems to have the support of his teammates. Unless RW bombs it in practice, I think he'll be the week 1 starter after what he's done so far.

buckmarkduck · Post by **buckmarkduck** » Sat Aug 25, 2012 6:11 pm

USUaggieDuck wrote:
buckmarkduck wrote:
USUaggieDuck wrote:Kc sat their starting DBs. But I'm all Wilson.

Sent from my iPad

So Eric Berry doesn start for KC now?
Did you not read where i say the two who didn't start? Would our defense be as good if we left in one starter?

Posted from my Android

No I didn't, that's why I asked. I know Berry was out all year wasn't sure if he was 100% back as a starter or not yet.

USUaggieDuck · Post by **USUaggieDuck** » Sat Aug 25, 2012 7:00 pm

buckmarkduck wrote:
USUaggieDuck wrote:
buckmarkduck wrote:
USUaggieDuck wrote:Kc sat their starting DBs. But I'm all Wilson.

Sent from my iPad

So Eric Berry doesn start for KC now?
Did you not read where i say the two who didn't start? Would our defense be as good if we left in one starter?

Posted from my Android

No I didn't, that's why I asked. I know Berry was out all year wasn't sure if he was 100% back as a starter or not yet.

sorry, thought you were being sarcastic. Berry played, and this is what happened

assets.sbnation.com/assets/1313910/berrywooo.gif

Sent from my iPad

Seahawks

Seahawks

Re: Seahawks

Re: Seahawks

Seahawks

Re: Seahawks

Re: Seahawks

Seahawks

Re: Seahawks

Seahawks

Re: Seahawks

Re: Seahawks

Re: Seahawks

Re: Seahawks

Re: Seahawks

Seahawks