Huskies starting 2 freshmen at WR

Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1

User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 40520
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Huskies starting 2 freshmen at WR

Post by UOducksTK1 »


Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
User avatar
lukeyrid13
All-American
Posts: 10475
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
GM: Portland TrailBlazers

Re: Huskies starting 2 freshmen at WR

Post by lukeyrid13 »

what happened to james johnson?
Duck24
Senior
Posts: 4744
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:36 am
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Huskies starting 2 freshmen at WR

Post by Duck24 »

lukeyrid13 wrote:what happened to james johnson?
Article says that he is injured:
Taylor has obviously ascended to a starting spot due to the injuries to James Johnson and Smith.
User avatar
Elduderino
Senior
Posts: 2242
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:19 pm
Location: CA

Re: Huskies starting 2 freshmen at WR

Post by Elduderino »

Duck24 wrote:
lukeyrid13 wrote:what happened to james johnson?
Article says that he is injured:
Taylor has obviously ascended to a starting spot due to the injuries to James Johnson and Smith.
That LSU secondary is probably terrified..........
AKA: CAgrown
Braveheart
Sophomore
Posts: 1549
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 1:46 am

Re: Huskies starting 2 freshmen at WR

Post by Braveheart »

Jaydon Mickens is that dude though. Kid's a stud and will do big things for the Huskies.
Image
User avatar
Elduderino
Senior
Posts: 2242
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:19 pm
Location: CA

Re: Huskies starting 2 freshmen at WR

Post by Elduderino »

Braveheart wrote:Jaydon Mickens is that dude though. Kid's a stud and will do big things for the Huskies.
I like Mickens, to be sure. Most normal, even above average, FR WRs are not Marquise Lee though. I think he would have been real potent as a #3 (big part of why I gave their receiving options more credit than most).
AKA: CAgrown
Braveheart
Sophomore
Posts: 1549
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 1:46 am

Re: Huskies starting 2 freshmen at WR

Post by Braveheart »

Elduderino wrote:
Braveheart wrote:Jaydon Mickens is that dude though. Kid's a stud and will do big things for the Huskies.
I like Mickens, to be sure. Most normal, even above average, FR WRs are not Marquise Lee though. I think he would have been real potent as a #3 (big part of why I gave their receiving options more credit than most).
Oh no, he's "that dude", but he's not THAT DUDE (Or even this dude Image). Just making sure people know Jaydon's no scrub.
Image
User avatar
Phenom
All Pac-12
Posts: 9914
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:49 am

Re: Huskies starting 2 freshmen at WR

Post by Phenom »

We didn't offer Mickens for some reason. I think we liked Addison and Allen more.
Braveheart
Sophomore
Posts: 1549
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 1:46 am

Re: Huskies starting 2 freshmen at WR

Post by Braveheart »

Phenom wrote:We didn't offer Mickens for some reason. I think we liked Addison and Allen more.

I'm sure Addison and Mickens' role would be the same at UO, and I doubt Allen had anything to do with Mickens' recruitment (or lack thereof) since they are different type of receivers. Even though Addison didn't flip from A&M till later, the coaches probably had a sense that they could flip him a month/months in advance. If the ducks staff viewed Addison as the better prospect, offering Mickens would've jeopardized stealing Addison who was looking around but committed to an OOS school.

It'll be interesting comparing the two throughout their careers. While Addison is listed as the taller of the two, I see them as equals.
Image
User avatar
UofO8
Senior
Posts: 2538
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 3:41 pm

Re: Huskies starting 2 freshmen at WR

Post by UofO8 »

LSU secondary licking their chops.
Image
User avatar
Phenom
All Pac-12
Posts: 9914
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:49 am

Re: Huskies starting 2 freshmen at WR

Post by Phenom »

Braveheart wrote:
Phenom wrote:We didn't offer Mickens for some reason. I think we liked Addison and Allen more.

I'm sure Addison and Mickens' role would be the same at UO, and I doubt Allen had anything to do with Mickens' recruitment (or lack thereof) since they are different type of receivers. Even though Addison didn't flip from A&M till later, the coaches probably had a sense that they could flip him a month/months in advance. If the ducks staff viewed Addison as the better prospect, offering Mickens would've jeopardized stealing Addison who was looking around but committed to an OOS school.

It'll be interesting comparing the two throughout their careers. While Addison is listed as the taller of the two, I see them as equals.
Yeah, I think they liked Addison better. However, I believe that Addison and Allen were a package deal.
User avatar
dd10snoop28
All Pac-12
Posts: 5041
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:06 am
GM: New Jersey Nets GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Huskies starting 2 freshmen at WR

Post by dd10snoop28 »

Mickens is going to be a great slot WR for them. Much the same role that DAT played last year (less carries out of the backfield and not as talented obviously. He and FR Taylor are going to be good for UW for a while.

TBH, I think that UW is being a little overlooked this year. Their offense is extremely talented, though lacking some experience. Their offense alone should win them more games than most are giving them credit for.... and who knows, maybe Wilcox can improve their defense a little bit.

If Polk had stayed they would have been a scary team on offense.
Image
gogreen55
Senior
Posts: 2369
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 8:39 pm

Re: Huskies starting 2 freshmen at WR

Post by gogreen55 »

dd10snoop28 wrote:Their offense is extremely talented, though lacking some experience. Their offense alone should win them more games than most are giving them credit for.
I agree they have some nice skill position players...it all depends on how their offensive line performs though.
User avatar
Phenom
All Pac-12
Posts: 9914
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:49 am

Re: Huskies starting 2 freshmen at WR

Post by Phenom »

Maybe Price and and the WRs are talented, but their current RBs and O-line are below average.
User avatar
Duck07
All-American
Posts: 17123
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
Location: Parts Unknown

Re: Huskies starting 2 freshmen at WR

Post by Duck07 »

Phenom wrote:Maybe Price and and the WRs are talented, but their current RBs and O-line are below average.
And they have a pretty brutal schedule.Sure they play SdST and PortSt, but they also play LSU, USC, Stanford and us early. They could start the season 2-4 and while the 2nd half lightens up, Utah and Cal could both be losses leaving the poodles an Apple Cup loss (or oac/zona) from missing a bowl game. I find it more likely that they miss a bowl game than go 8-4 or better actually.
Image
Post Reply