Huskies starting 2 freshmen at WR
Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1
- UOducksTK1
- Site Admin

- Posts: 40520
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
- GM: Boston Celtics GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
Huskies starting 2 freshmen at WR

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
- lukeyrid13
- All-American
- Posts: 10475
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
- GM: Portland TrailBlazers
Re: Huskies starting 2 freshmen at WR
what happened to james johnson?
-
Duck24
- Senior
- Posts: 4744
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:36 am
- Location: Portland, OR
Re: Huskies starting 2 freshmen at WR
Article says that he is injured:lukeyrid13 wrote:what happened to james johnson?
Taylor has obviously ascended to a starting spot due to the injuries to James Johnson and Smith.
- Elduderino
- Senior
- Posts: 2242
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:19 pm
- Location: CA
Re: Huskies starting 2 freshmen at WR
That LSU secondary is probably terrified..........Duck24 wrote:Article says that he is injured:lukeyrid13 wrote:what happened to james johnson?
Taylor has obviously ascended to a starting spot due to the injuries to James Johnson and Smith.
AKA: CAgrown
-
Braveheart
- Sophomore
- Posts: 1549
- Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 1:46 am
Re: Huskies starting 2 freshmen at WR
Jaydon Mickens is that dude though. Kid's a stud and will do big things for the Huskies.
- Elduderino
- Senior
- Posts: 2242
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:19 pm
- Location: CA
Re: Huskies starting 2 freshmen at WR
I like Mickens, to be sure. Most normal, even above average, FR WRs are not Marquise Lee though. I think he would have been real potent as a #3 (big part of why I gave their receiving options more credit than most).Braveheart wrote:Jaydon Mickens is that dude though. Kid's a stud and will do big things for the Huskies.
AKA: CAgrown
-
Braveheart
- Sophomore
- Posts: 1549
- Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 1:46 am
Re: Huskies starting 2 freshmen at WR
Oh no, he's "that dude", but he's not THAT DUDE (Or even this dudeElduderino wrote:I like Mickens, to be sure. Most normal, even above average, FR WRs are not Marquise Lee though. I think he would have been real potent as a #3 (big part of why I gave their receiving options more credit than most).Braveheart wrote:Jaydon Mickens is that dude though. Kid's a stud and will do big things for the Huskies.
- Phenom
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 9914
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:49 am
Re: Huskies starting 2 freshmen at WR
We didn't offer Mickens for some reason. I think we liked Addison and Allen more.
-
Braveheart
- Sophomore
- Posts: 1549
- Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 1:46 am
Re: Huskies starting 2 freshmen at WR
Phenom wrote:We didn't offer Mickens for some reason. I think we liked Addison and Allen more.
I'm sure Addison and Mickens' role would be the same at UO, and I doubt Allen had anything to do with Mickens' recruitment (or lack thereof) since they are different type of receivers. Even though Addison didn't flip from A&M till later, the coaches probably had a sense that they could flip him a month/months in advance. If the ducks staff viewed Addison as the better prospect, offering Mickens would've jeopardized stealing Addison who was looking around but committed to an OOS school.
It'll be interesting comparing the two throughout their careers. While Addison is listed as the taller of the two, I see them as equals.
- UofO8
- Senior
- Posts: 2538
- Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 3:41 pm
- Phenom
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 9914
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:49 am
Re: Huskies starting 2 freshmen at WR
Yeah, I think they liked Addison better. However, I believe that Addison and Allen were a package deal.Braveheart wrote:Phenom wrote:We didn't offer Mickens for some reason. I think we liked Addison and Allen more.
I'm sure Addison and Mickens' role would be the same at UO, and I doubt Allen had anything to do with Mickens' recruitment (or lack thereof) since they are different type of receivers. Even though Addison didn't flip from A&M till later, the coaches probably had a sense that they could flip him a month/months in advance. If the ducks staff viewed Addison as the better prospect, offering Mickens would've jeopardized stealing Addison who was looking around but committed to an OOS school.
It'll be interesting comparing the two throughout their careers. While Addison is listed as the taller of the two, I see them as equals.
- dd10snoop28
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5041
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:06 am
- GM: New Jersey Nets GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
Re: Huskies starting 2 freshmen at WR
Mickens is going to be a great slot WR for them. Much the same role that DAT played last year (less carries out of the backfield and not as talented obviously. He and FR Taylor are going to be good for UW for a while.
TBH, I think that UW is being a little overlooked this year. Their offense is extremely talented, though lacking some experience. Their offense alone should win them more games than most are giving them credit for.... and who knows, maybe Wilcox can improve their defense a little bit.
If Polk had stayed they would have been a scary team on offense.
TBH, I think that UW is being a little overlooked this year. Their offense is extremely talented, though lacking some experience. Their offense alone should win them more games than most are giving them credit for.... and who knows, maybe Wilcox can improve their defense a little bit.
If Polk had stayed they would have been a scary team on offense.

-
gogreen55
- Senior
- Posts: 2369
- Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 8:39 pm
Re: Huskies starting 2 freshmen at WR
I agree they have some nice skill position players...it all depends on how their offensive line performs though.dd10snoop28 wrote:Their offense is extremely talented, though lacking some experience. Their offense alone should win them more games than most are giving them credit for.
- Phenom
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 9914
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:49 am
Re: Huskies starting 2 freshmen at WR
Maybe Price and and the WRs are talented, but their current RBs and O-line are below average.
- Duck07
- All-American
- Posts: 17123
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
- Location: Parts Unknown
Re: Huskies starting 2 freshmen at WR
And they have a pretty brutal schedule.Sure they play SdST and PortSt, but they also play LSU, USC, Stanford and us early. They could start the season 2-4 and while the 2nd half lightens up, Utah and Cal could both be losses leaving the poodles an Apple Cup loss (or oac/zona) from missing a bowl game. I find it more likely that they miss a bowl game than go 8-4 or better actually.Phenom wrote:Maybe Price and and the WRs are talented, but their current RBs and O-line are below average.

