Pistons/Knicks Trade - VETO*

Zyme · Post by **Zyme** » Tue Jan 28, 2014 1:20 pm

Knicks Send:
#55

Pistons Send:
3rd round pick
1990 1st

lukeyrid13 · Post by **lukeyrid13** » Tue Jan 28, 2014 1:23 pm

A first rounder to move up like 6 spots? I'm not sure about this one....

lukeyrid13 · Post by **lukeyrid13** » Tue Jan 28, 2014 1:26 pm

Pistons already traded their 89 1st to Magic.

Cancel trade

Zyme · Post by **Zyme** » Tue Jan 28, 2014 1:29 pm

Updated:
Knicks Send:
#55

Pistons Send:
3rd round pick
1990 1st

eddy_zamora · Post by **eddy_zamora** » Tue Jan 28, 2014 1:31 pm

Agreeed

lukeyrid13 · Post by **lukeyrid13** » Tue Jan 28, 2014 1:31 pm

^ sorry Zyme, that would be four straight picks the pistons would give up....and doing so to only move up 6 spots. I'm gonna veto that one too.

Zyme · Post by **Zyme** » Tue Jan 28, 2014 1:32 pm

lukeyrid13 wrote:^ sorry Zyme, that would be four straight picks the pistons would give up....and doing so to only move up 6 spots. I'm gonna veto that one too.

that's a really weak veto, I would like a 2nd opinion from ducky.

dd10snoop28 · Post by **dd10snoop28** » Tue Jan 28, 2014 1:33 pm

eddy_zamora wrote:Agreeed

Be patient, eddy. There is a good chance that the player you are targeting will fall to you. Why sacrifice another future first round pick to move up just 6 spots?

lukeyrid13 · Post by **lukeyrid13** » Tue Jan 28, 2014 1:35 pm

Zyme wrote:
lukeyrid13 wrote:^ sorry Zyme, that would be four straight picks the pistons would give up....and doing so to only move up 6 spots. I'm gonna veto that one too.
that's a really weak veto, I would like a 2nd opinion from ducky.

I can message him.....but to trade 4 first rounders in a row and only have 3 players on your roster......and he only moves up 6 spots. If the third rounder was removed I'd consider but it'd really have to be worth it to me to give up 4 straight 1sts in case a new GM would take over in a season for some reason.

Post by **UOducksTK1** » Tue Jan 28, 2014 1:41 pm

I could justify moving up 6 spots IN THE FIRST ROUND and sacrificing a first round pick.

I'm gray on this, Could you guys swap 4th and 5th round picks or something? A little more going Pistons way and I'm ok with letting it go through.

Post by **UOducksTK1** » Tue Jan 28, 2014 1:43 pm

The more I look at this, and it makes 0 sense for the Pistons. It's not the worst deal, but giving up a first for practically nothing seems foolish.

pudgejeff · Post by **pudgejeff** » Tue Jan 28, 2014 1:44 pm

UOducksTK1 wrote:The more I look at this, and it makes 0 sense for the Pistons. It's not the worst deal, but giving up a first for practically nothing seems foolish.

I would agree. And noobs making mistakes is what veto's are for, kinda like the Hakeem trade.

Post by **UOducksTK1** » Tue Jan 28, 2014 1:45 pm

dd10snoop28 wrote:
eddy_zamora wrote:Agreeed
Be patient, eddy. There is a good chance that the player you are targeting will fall to you. Why sacrifice another future first round pick to move up just 6 spots?

This.

eddy_zamora · Post by **eddy_zamora** » Tue Jan 28, 2014 1:45 pm

I don't know. I just keep seeing the clock ticking down and yeah. I'm very impatient. I can see where you guys are concerned. I plan on winning with Magic and 'Nique for 3-4 years. But I see exactly where it makes little sense. I just have a plan.

lukeyrid13 · Post by **lukeyrid13** » Tue Jan 28, 2014 1:46 pm

I'll allow this if we allow the Hakeem trade

Pistons/Knicks Trade - VETO*

Pistons/Knicks Trade - VETO*

Re: Pistons/Knicks Trade

Re: Pistons/Knicks Trade

Re: Pistons/Knicks Trade

Re: Pistons/Knicks Trade

Re: Pistons/Knicks Trade

Re: Pistons/Knicks Trade

Re: Pistons/Knicks Trade

Re: Pistons/Knicks Trade

Re: Pistons/Knicks Trade

Re: Pistons/Knicks Trade

Re: Pistons/Knicks Trade

Re: Pistons/Knicks Trade

Re: Pistons/Knicks Trade

Re: Pistons/Knicks Trade