Page 1 of 1

Trae Young

Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2018 6:33 pm
by lukeyrid13
He should come out in this draft. Not sure how he fell through the cracks but maybe he 'signed a deal in Europe' and is now available to come over? He should come in as a star IMO but it would be cool if he could be added to this draft class since he's averaging 31ppg as a frosh currently.

Re: Trae Young

Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2018 6:46 pm
by Oregon Ownage
lukeyrid13 wrote:He should come out in this draft. Not sure how he fell through the cracks but maybe he 'signed a deal in Europe' and is now available to come over? He should come in as a star IMO but it would be cool if he could be added to this draft class since he's averaging 31ppg as a frosh currently.
He was drafted by the Spurs two/three years ago in the 2nd round and got cycled through. I talked with Jibba about making him the star of this class and thats when he let me know that he already was drafted.

Re: Trae Young

Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2018 6:48 pm
by Oregon Ownage
Pick 34

http://www.ducksattack.com/forum/viewto ... 29&t=28873

Amazing how timing can make a difference

Re: Trae Young

Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2018 7:32 pm
by lukeyrid13
Could he have a twin brother with the same name maybe lol

Re: Trae Young

Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2018 7:59 pm
by eddy_zamora
Yeah I’m with Lukey, there’s kinda a shortage on young PGs and Trae would be a solid pinnacle piece.

Re: Trae Young

Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 6:24 am
by Cellar-door
I say leave him out, no need to double up guys, that's DASL, some guys bust some busts become good players. If we want familiar names we should just cycle back to the beginning again.

Re: Trae Young

Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 7:22 am
by Oregon Ownage
Cellar-door wrote:I say leave him out, no need to double up guys, that's DASL, some guys bust some busts become good players. If we want familiar names we should just cycle back to the beginning again.
Agree, then it becomes well Russ didnt turn out to be a star, lets create aclone of him and so on.

Re: Trae Young

Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 2:18 pm
by Zyme
eddy_zamora wrote:Yeah I’m with Lukey, there’s kinda a shortage on young PGs and Trae would be a solid pinnacle piece.
There are too many PGs to begin with right now.

Re: Trae Young

Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2018 11:27 am
by pistolpetejr
Zyme wrote:
eddy_zamora wrote:Yeah I’m with Lukey, there’s kinda a shortage on young PGs and Trae would be a solid pinnacle piece.
There are too many PGs to begin with right now.

Re: Trae Young

Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2018 3:45 pm
by Marzeial
There can never be too many PG's. My team needs more of them...

But seriously, he already flamed out. I'm ok with not bringing him back. Not everyone needs to pan out the way that we all projected

Re: Trae Young

Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2018 4:47 pm
by UOducksTK1
Zyme wrote:
eddy_zamora wrote:Yeah I’m with Lukey, there’s kinda a shortage on young PGs and Trae would be a solid pinnacle piece.
There are too many PGs to begin with right now.

Re: Trae Young

Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 4:23 pm
by jibbajabba614
Yeah sucks. At the time, he was a 2nd round pick in mock drafts. I think I filled him in on the 2019 PG class. I usually go with top rank guys in the class.