Page 1 of 1
Are we on Quack Watch?
Posted: Sat May 25, 2019 6:03 am
by jimmy12
Re: Are we on Quack Watch?
Posted: Sat May 25, 2019 6:13 am
by jimmy12
Re: Are we on Quack Watch?
Posted: Sat May 25, 2019 9:41 am
by Phenom
Wilson ran a sub 4.6 as a HS jr. He’s not going to be a TE.
Re: Are we on Quack Watch?
Posted: Sat May 25, 2019 10:35 am
by jimmy12
Phenom wrote:Wilson ran a sub 4.6 as a HS jr. He’s not going to be a TE.
Just telling you what I've read on other sites.
Does anyone have any idea what Jhop means by good news bad news on Roger?
Re: Are we on Quack Watch?
Posted: Sat May 25, 2019 12:06 pm
by Merganzer
Re: Are we on Quack Watch?
Posted: Sat May 25, 2019 12:22 pm
by greenyellow
So it looks like the bad news is no commitment (plus UW in his final two) and the good news is Oregon made his final two.
Re: Are we on Quack Watch?
Posted: Sat May 25, 2019 1:11 pm
by lukeyrid13
Wilson looked pretty thin in highlights I’ve seen, but he was likely 16 at the time some so I suppose he could fill out a lot more.
Re: Are we on Quack Watch?
Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 4:56 pm
by GoDucksTroll
Phenom wrote:Wilson ran a sub 4.6 as a HS jr. He’s not going to be a TE.
Wilson should be playing WR, in my opinion. He's a lot thicker in real life than in his HUDL, looks more like his listed height/weight/ but he's a pure WR.
Re: Are we on Quack Watch?
Posted: Tue May 28, 2019 10:29 am
by UOducksTK1
greenyellow wrote:So it looks like the bad news is no commitment (plus UW in his final two) and the good news is Oregon made his final two.
Ya a little nervous with UW there. But I know Oregon has been a favorite for a long while. Hoping we can snag him, he's gonna be a legit college OL.