Page 1 of 1

Ducks #1 in Way Too Early WBB ESPN Top 25

Posted: Wed Sep 04, 2019 2:19 pm
by Merganzer

Re: Ducks #1 in Way Too Early WBB ESPN Top 25

Posted: Wed Sep 04, 2019 2:21 pm
by StevensTechU
Despite the injury to Nyara? If Sedona Prince doesn't get a transfer waiver, I don't know that #1 is warranted.

Re: Ducks #1 in Way Too Early WBB ESPN Top 25

Posted: Wed Sep 04, 2019 3:57 pm
by Greenblood
While I by no means fancy myself a women's college basketball expert, with four returning starters (three of whom are perhaps AA quality), three returning reserves, three international recruits + Moore on their roster, I can't say I'm surprised the Ducks are #1. I even wonder, as good as she hopefully will prove to be at some point, just how much the presence of Nyara -- still yet to play college ball -- would even figure into such preseason predictions.

Re: Ducks #1 in Way Too Early WBB ESPN Top 25

Posted: Wed Sep 04, 2019 4:12 pm
by StevensTechU
Oregon's downfall in 2019 was size inside. Nyara is 6'5, and Prince is 6'7. Without the addition of one of those two (down to Prince now), the team will have the same Achilles.

Re: Ducks #1 in Way Too Early WBB ESPN Top 25

Posted: Thu Sep 05, 2019 12:06 pm
by Thurston
Who else would it be? Baylor is #2, and we lost a super close F4 game to them and they lost Kalani Brown to graduation. We're as good a bet as #1 as anyone else.

Re: Ducks #1 in Way Too Early WBB ESPN Top 25

Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2019 9:55 am
by duck58
Thurston wrote:Who else would it be? Baylor is #2, and we lost a super close F4 game to them and they lost Kalani Brown to graduation. We're as good a bet as #1 as anyone else.
Exactly.

Re: Ducks #1 in Way Too Early WBB ESPN Top 25

Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2019 11:08 am
by StevensTechU
Totally get that. Such is the difference between rankings and predicting who will actually win it all.

I hope it's as simple as Prince is deemed eligible.

Re: Ducks #1 in Way Too Early WBB ESPN Top 25

Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2019 1:04 pm
by bigsugarduck
StevensTechU wrote:Oregon's downfall in 2019 was size inside. Nyara is 6'5, and Prince is 6'7. Without the addition of one of those two (down to Prince now), the team will have the same Achilles.
Wrong.

Depth was the downfall. Yes, of course a few more bigs would have been great, but Oregon absolutely beats Baylor if Taylor Chavez helps spell the guards in that game. Sabrina ran out of gas playing the whole game, and couldn't make shots late...lacking guard depth cut the season short, not lacking bigs...

If Oregon has better depth this year, they should absolutely be #1. Oregon may have 3 of the top 10-15 players in the country with Hebard, Sabally and Ionescue. No one else can make that argument...

Re: Ducks #1 in Way Too Early WBB ESPN Top 25

Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2019 1:44 pm
by StevensTechU
bigsugarduck wrote:
StevensTechU wrote:Oregon's downfall in 2019 was size inside. Nyara is 6'5, and Prince is 6'7. Without the addition of one of those two (down to Prince now), the team will have the same Achilles.
Wrong.

Depth was the downfall. Yes, of course a few more bigs would have been great, but Oregon absolutely beats Baylor if Taylor Chavez helps spell the guards in that game. Sabrina ran out of gas playing the whole game, and couldn't make shots late...lacking guard depth cut the season short, not lacking bigs...

If Oregon has better depth this year, they should absolutely be #1. Oregon may have 3 of the top 10-15 players in the country with Hebard, Sabally and Ionescue. No one else can make that argument...
Oh, I'm sorry. Thanks for setting me straight.

....

Re: Ducks #1 in Way Too Early WBB ESPN Top 25

Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2019 11:09 am
by bigsugarduck
StevensTechU wrote:
bigsugarduck wrote:
StevensTechU wrote:Oregon's downfall in 2019 was size inside. Nyara is 6'5, and Prince is 6'7. Without the addition of one of those two (down to Prince now), the team will have the same Achilles.
Wrong.

Depth was the downfall. Yes, of course a few more bigs would have been great, but Oregon absolutely beats Baylor if Taylor Chavez helps spell the guards in that game. Sabrina ran out of gas playing the whole game, and couldn't make shots late...lacking guard depth cut the season short, not lacking bigs...

If Oregon has better depth this year, they should absolutely be #1. Oregon may have 3 of the top 10-15 players in the country with Hebard, Sabally and Ionescue. No one else can make that argument...
Oh, I'm sorry. Thanks for setting me straight.

....
:oops: Solid response to a jerk like me... :roll:

I totally get your point about the lack of bigs but really think that was simply part of the overall lack of depth.

Re: Ducks #1 in Way Too Early WBB ESPN Top 25

Posted: Fri Sep 20, 2019 2:12 pm
by Merganzer

Re: Ducks #1 in Way Too Early WBB ESPN Top 25

Posted: Fri Sep 20, 2019 2:56 pm
by bigsugarduck
Merganzer wrote:
Ooops....Guess I should have said 3 of the top 7 (draft eligible players) in the country...Apparently I undersold them...

Being cautious is understandable, but no other team should be #1 with the starter talent Oregon has.