Page 1 of 6

1983 Draft Discussion

Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2020 2:35 pm
by Oregon Ownage
Use this thread to discuss the pick selections so the actual picks dont get lost in the shuffle

Re: 1983 Draft Discussion

Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2020 2:39 pm
by chipper
Woooo draft time!!! Curious who goes #2 and beyond.

Re: 1983 Draft Discussion

Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2020 2:39 pm
by chipper
Also it says 3 hours during work week- is it untimed on weekend?

Re: 1983 Draft Discussion

Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2020 2:59 pm
by Oregon Ownage
chipper wrote:Also it says 3 hours during work week- is it untimed on weekend?
Updated

It’s 2 hours

Re: 1983 Draft Discussion

Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2020 2:59 pm
by lukeyrid13
So is Ralph Sampson truly the next Moses?

Re: 1983 Draft Discussion

Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2020 3:29 pm
by the goat
I'm really curious about who the Wiz take at 3

Re: 1983 Draft Discussion

Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2020 3:54 pm
by chipper
LOL I LOVE THAT MY PICK IN FBB WON THE LOTTO :lol: go f'n figure :lol:

Re: 1983 Draft Discussion

Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2020 6:14 pm
by chipper
I am VERY curious who the Cavs pick here. Could go a number of directions honestly.

Re: 1983 Draft Discussion

Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2020 6:36 pm
by chipper
Good pick and damn was hoping that wouldn't happen lol. Really was hoping he'd magically fall to 4 lol.

Re: 1983 Draft Discussion

Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2020 6:36 pm
by Briezy
Went Harper. Should pair well with Tucker.

Re: 1983 Draft Discussion

Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2020 6:59 pm
by lukeyrid13
Notes on Harper were solid. A 20ppg PG with good defense can be a game changer In FBB

Re: 1983 Draft Discussion

Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2020 7:02 pm
by chipper
Yeah you can make an argument of sorts that,d epending on team need, he COULD have gone ahead of Sampson if a team was stacked at the big- because his notes are incredible.

Re: 1983 Draft Discussion

Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2020 7:09 pm
by jibbajabba614
chipper wrote:Yeah you can make an argument of sorts that,d epending on team need, he COULD have gone ahead of Sampson if a team was stacked at the big- because his notes are incredible.
Moses Malone was put in there for a reason. Made sure he would be the top pick. Harper is good, just not MVP good. Having a scoring PG does really help the league transition into more outside shooting teams.

Re: 1983 Draft Discussion

Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2020 7:14 pm
by chipper
jibbajabba614 wrote:
chipper wrote:Yeah you can make an argument of sorts that,d epending on team need, he COULD have gone ahead of Sampson if a team was stacked at the big- because his notes are incredible.
Moses Malone was put in there for a reason. Made sure he would be the top pick. Harper is good, just not MVP good. Having a scoring PG does really help the league transition into more outside shooting teams.
Yeah and the PG position in FBB is so broken- it's why there are limits as to who can play it. PG is such an advantage in this game it's crazy.

Re: 1983 Draft Discussion

Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2020 7:51 pm
by jibbajabba614
chipper wrote:
jibbajabba614 wrote:
chipper wrote:Yeah you can make an argument of sorts that,d epending on team need, he COULD have gone ahead of Sampson if a team was stacked at the big- because his notes are incredible.
Moses Malone was put in there for a reason. Made sure he would be the top pick. Harper is good, just not MVP good. Having a scoring PG does really help the league transition into more outside shooting teams.
Yeah and the PG position in FBB is so broken- it's why there are limits as to who can play it. PG is such an advantage in this game it's crazy.
Zyme was the one who figured out the glitch in the game. Point guards with 70+ handles break the game. Reason why we try to keep them at a 30-40 range in the draft.