WBB: #11 UCLA vs #8 Oregon (Sun 1 PM Pac-12 Network)
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2020 10:09 pm
JAN 3 (SUN) 1 PM
UCLA
EUGENE, OR
TV: PAC-12 NETWORK
UCLA
EUGENE, OR
TV: PAC-12 NETWORK
Oregon Ducks Sports Message Board Forum
https://ducksattack.com/forum/
True. Not a fan of how the game was called, which dramatically benefitted UCLA. So many non-calls when UCLA players mauled Oregon players. I'll never understand how one team can hand check, bump, and swat at everything, and yet roughly the same number of fouls are called on both teams.Tray Dub wrote:Ducks lose 73-71. Went on an 11-0 run down the stretch to tie it at 71, but botched the last few possessions. Would've liked the win but this kind of game experience for a young team is valuable regardless.
Glorified jr high refs. Get what you pay for...bigsugarduck wrote:True. Not a fan of how the game was called, which dramatically benefitted UCLA. So many non-calls when UCLA players mauled Oregon players. I'll never understand how one team can hand check, bump, and swat at everything, and yet roughly the same number of fouls are called on both teams.Tray Dub wrote:Ducks lose 73-71. Went on an 11-0 run down the stretch to tie it at 71, but botched the last few possessions. Would've liked the win but this kind of game experience for a young team is valuable regardless.No biggie though, this team will rebound.
Without Prince, it wasn't really much of an upset. The game was pretty much a tossup before it started, and it came down to the last possession. The current rankings don't take into account that Oregon is missing what was expected to be their best player.shoparound wrote:Team is still not razor sharp (as expected with so many newcomers), but they are growing and battling. UCLA wasn't expected to beat us, we have to return the favor to Stanford.
I'd have to disagree. I wouldn't say Prince is our make it or break it player so far. Even this season when she's been playing it's been good but I wouldn't say she's lights out and terrorizing the other team. Our depth still should have been good enough to win this game (I mean UCLA was using a high school player). I think the team is just still inconsistent, as expected because the core haven't played together in a full season.gogreen55 wrote:Without Prince, it wasn't really much of an upset. The game was pretty much a tossup before it started, and it came down to the last possession. The current rankings don't take into account that Oregon is missing what was expected to be their best player.shoparound wrote:Team is still not razor sharp (as expected with so many newcomers), but they are growing and battling. UCLA wasn't expected to beat us, we have to return the favor to Stanford.
1. The expectation that Prince was going to be our best player this season isn't really a matter of a opinion, it is just a fact. She was a preseason All-Conference selection before having played a minute at Oregon, Graves said he views her as a future #1 pick in the NBA draft and he said he wanted her to be the focal point of the offense, both scoring and passing, similar to Jokic of the Nuggets. This doesn't even take into account the defensive presence she was expected to provide. You take Prince away, plus take Chavez away (who was expected by most to be the best guard on the team this season) and this isn't the same team as the rankings indicate.shoparound wrote:I'd have to disagree. I wouldn't say Prince is our make it or break it player so far. Even this season when she's been playing it's been good but I wouldn't say she's lights out and terrorizing the other team. Our depth still should have been good enough to win this game (I mean UCLA was using a high school player). I think the team is just still inconsistent, as expected because the core haven't played together in a full season.gogreen55 wrote:Without Prince, it wasn't really much of an upset. The game was pretty much a tossup before it started, and it came down to the last possession. The current rankings don't take into account that Oregon is missing what was expected to be their best player.shoparound wrote:Team is still not razor sharp (as expected with so many newcomers), but they are growing and battling. UCLA wasn't expected to beat us, we have to return the favor to Stanford.