Ducks Attack Message Board Forum

Grizzlies send
Eaton
Banks
Robinson
Green
89 Mavs
89 t wolves
90 jazz
91 Grizz
92 Grizz
92 Lakers (top 5 protected, unprotected 93)

Nuggets send
Barkley
Drexler
Petersen

Accept. Lets see how this pans out

Yikes

offtheheezy wrote:Accept. Lets see how this pans out

Turrible (Barkley voice)

Boom wrote:

offtheheezy wrote:Accept. Lets see how this pans out

Turrible (Barkley voice)

Wow. Never expected this.

All the picks are playoffs teams right now. So really depends if any of those get into top 10 or not. Twolves/Mavs have potential this year. And Lakers maybe?

If not, big win for Grizz.

Why go get Bird if you're gonna dump Chuck?

I need to add A.C. Green and Nuggets will add Petersen to make salaries work.

the goat wrote:Why go get Bird if you're gonna dump Chuck?

We’ll my team isn’t performing nearly as well as I thought
But really this give me a bit more leverage I think.

Foxyg1396 wrote:

the goat wrote:Why go get Bird if you're gonna dump Chuck?

We’ll my team isn’t performing nearly as well as I thought
But really this give me a bit more leverage I think.

Whats in the DASL water?

Nuggets dont own they picks for the next 4 years and deal their best player?

Oregon Ownage wrote:

Foxyg1396 wrote:

the goat wrote:Why go get Bird if you're gonna dump Chuck?

We’ll my team isn’t performing nearly as well as I thought
But really this give me a bit more leverage I think.

Whats in the DASL water?

Nuggets dont own they picks for the next 4 years and deal their best player?

Best player is subjective, for me I think Barkley would always be the Robin to Batman. I didn’t really see him as a center piece personally

Foxyg1396 wrote:

Oregon Ownage wrote:

Foxyg1396 wrote:

the goat wrote:Why go get Bird if you're gonna dump Chuck?

We’ll my team isn’t performing nearly as well as I thought
But really this give me a bit more leverage I think.

Whats in the DASL water?

Nuggets dont own they picks for the next 4 years and deal their best player?

Best player is subjective, for me I think Barkley would always be the Robin to Batman. I didn’t really see him as a center piece personally

What? Before the start of last year, he was dubbed the best PF in DASL. You've had him as a 3rd scoring option or non-scoring option most the time in your DC. That will hurt his output.

Nuggets Timeline:
- Suck
- Draft Barkley
- Surround Barkely with other young stars
- Make WCF
- Acquire old Bird
- Slow start to season
- Trade Barkley and Drexler for "more leverage"

Can someone please make this make sense to me?

UOducksTK1 wrote:

Foxyg1396 wrote:

Oregon Ownage wrote:

Foxyg1396 wrote:

the goat wrote:Why go get Bird if you're gonna dump Chuck?

We’ll my team isn’t performing nearly as well as I thought
But really this give me a bit more leverage I think.

Whats in the DASL water?

Nuggets dont own they picks for the next 4 years and deal their best player?

Best player is subjective, for me I think Barkley would always be the Robin to Batman. I didn’t really see him as a center piece personally

What? Before the start of last year, he was dubbed the best PF in DASL. You've had him as a 3rd scoring option or non-scoring option most the time in your DC. That will hurt his output.

I agree, but the rest of my lineup isn’t based around inside scoring, Barkley is atrocious at best for anything other than that.