Oregon Ducks Sports Message Board Forum
https://ducksattack.com/forum/
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Don't believe so but who knows.DmoneyDuck wrote:Any relation to Keenan and Trey?
I wondered the same thing.DmoneyDuck wrote:Any relation to Keenan and Trey?
My brother in law goes to all the LO games and loves this addition. His direct quote is that he is lightening fast, great breaks out of routes and the best hands he has seen. I think Lowe was wildly underrated. There is a reason Notre Dame, Florida and USC wanted him. This is a big time get in our backyard.StevensTechU wrote:This helps ease the pain of losing Setagna, the WR commit we had from Arkansas. Quite similar players.
It doesn't look like Lowe ran a full track season, as he only has one registered 100m time on Athletic.net. Maybe the season didn't finish in the state? I'm a little shocked he doesn't have any sub-11 100m times, because his hudl makes it look like he goes 0 to 100 as fast as anybody we've had since DAT (maaaaybe Charles Nelson). He has a lot of growth left in being a wide receiver, but there are glimpses of potential to be more than just a fast guy (hands look pretty good, lateral movement is great).
I always theorize a player of his size losses less of his track speed with the weight handicap of pads and helmet then a smaller player would. It would be an interesting study to see different track guys run a 100 in full football gear. I wonder what a good 100 time would be.StevensTechU wrote:This helps ease the pain of losing Setagna, the WR commit we had from Arkansas. Quite similar players.
It doesn't look like Lowe ran a full track season, as he only has one registered 100m time on Athletic.net. Maybe the season didn't finish in the state? I'm a little shocked he doesn't have any sub-11 100m times, because his hudl makes it look like he goes 0 to 100 as fast as anybody we've had since DAT (maaaaybe Charles Nelson). He has a lot of growth left in being a wide receiver, but there are glimpses of potential to be more than just a fast guy (hands look pretty good, lateral movement is great).
Should also make them run the 40 in full football gear!GrandpaDuck wrote:I always theorize a player of his size losses less of his track speed with the weight handicap of pads and helmet then a smaller player would. It would be an interesting study to see different track guys run a 100 in full football gear. I wonder what a good 100 time would be.StevensTechU wrote:This helps ease the pain of losing Setagna, the WR commit we had from Arkansas. Quite similar players.
It doesn't look like Lowe ran a full track season, as he only has one registered 100m time on Athletic.net. Maybe the season didn't finish in the state? I'm a little shocked he doesn't have any sub-11 100m times, because his hudl makes it look like he goes 0 to 100 as fast as anybody we've had since DAT (maaaaybe Charles Nelson). He has a lot of growth left in being a wide receiver, but there are glimpses of potential to be more than just a fast guy (hands look pretty good, lateral movement is great).
This may have some legs to it, pun intentional. The world’s top 100 meter sprinters are (with a few exceptions) all very light for their height, even the ones that look muscular enough to weigh more than they do. Only a handful above 180 (Bolt is 6’5” 207) including one that’s 6’ 148 pounds. It’s part of what made Thomas Tyner such a unicorn. If a guy has track speed without being underweight for football reasons it also makes me think he can shoulder the extra bulk and lose less speed in the process. Modern pads are so small and light, but still a factor.GrandpaDuck wrote:I always theorize a player of his size losses less of his track speed with the weight handicap of pads and helmet then a smaller player would. It would be an interesting study to see different track guys run a 100 in full football gear. I wonder what a good 100 time would be.StevensTechU wrote:This helps ease the pain of losing Setagna, the WR commit we had from Arkansas. Quite similar players.
It doesn't look like Lowe ran a full track season, as he only has one registered 100m time on Athletic.net. Maybe the season didn't finish in the state? I'm a little shocked he doesn't have any sub-11 100m times, because his hudl makes it look like he goes 0 to 100 as fast as anybody we've had since DAT (maaaaybe Charles Nelson). He has a lot of growth left in being a wide receiver, but there are glimpses of potential to be more than just a fast guy (hands look pretty good, lateral movement is great).