Ducks Attack Message Board Forum

Whelp, we finished #3 in the Pac-12 this year at #25 overall. Stanford was #1, at #17 overall, and surprising Arizona finished just ahead of us at #24. Jonathan Smith led the resurgent Beavers to the 6th best finish at #55.Even with all their fire power, USC finished a dismal 10th in the Pac-12 at #65 overall, finishing ahead of only UW and that train wreck of a program, ASU. Herman is going to be squirming next year! Speaking of UW, the mighty Fuskies finished 11th in the league with a woeful 93rd overall, finishing just ahead of the likes of #94 Central Michigan, #95 Kent State, #96 Ball State, and #97 power house New Mexico, leading the Husky faithful to much weeping and gnashing of teeth!

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

RanDux wrote:Whelp, we finished #2 in the Pac-12 this year at #25 overall. Stanford was #1, at #17 overall. Jonathan Smith led the resurgent Beavers to the

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Which site's ratings are you using? On 247, they have Arizona right ahead of us at #24.

RanDux wrote:Whelp, we finished #3 in the Pac-12 this year at #25 overall. Stanford was #1, at #17 overall, and surprising Arizona finished just ahead of us at #24. Jonathan Smith led the resurgent Beavers to the 6th best finish at #55.Even with all their fire power, USC finished a dismal 10th in the Pac-12 at #65 overall, finishing ahead of only UW and that train wreck of a program, ASU. Herman is going to be squirming next year! Speaking of UW, the mighty Fuskies finished 11th in the league with a woeful 93rd overall, finishing just ahead of the likes of #94 Central Michigan, #95 Kent State, #96 Ball State, and #97 power house New Mexico, leading the Husky faithful to much weeping and gnashing of teeth!

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

And in a final note, Cristobal's Canes did finish ahead of all Pac-12 schools at #15.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

pdxduck2013 wrote:

RanDux wrote:Whelp, we finished #2 in the Pac-12 this year at #25 overall. Stanford was #1, at #17 overall. Jonathan Smith led the resurgent Beavers to the

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Which site's ratings are you using? On 247, they have Arizona right ahead of us at #24.

Yup, I fixed it. Thanks.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Still a chance to add Conerly in March, too

Where do we fall with average player ranking? cause we only took 15 players this year

lukeyrid13 wrote:Where do we fall with average player ranking? cause we only took 15 players this year

15th

RanDux wrote:Even with all their fire power, USC finished a dismal 10th in the Pac-12 at #65 overall, finishing ahead of only UW and that train wreck of a program, ASU.

While that is what 247 says, I don't think it accurately portrays what's going on. USC signed 8 guys but took 13 transfers. There's no way a 21 person class of that caliber is #65.

ducks5ever wrote:

RanDux wrote:Even with all their fire power, USC finished a dismal 10th in the Pac-12 at #65 overall, finishing ahead of only UW and that train wreck of a program, ASU.

While that is what 247 says, I don't think it accurately portrays what's going on. USC signed 8 guys but took 13 transfers. There's no way a 21 person class of that caliber is #65.

Transfers arent included in the rankings?

In the unlikely event Oregon adds Conerly then they jump up to #12. But with Harbaugh sticking with Michigan it’s even less likely.

Fun fact: for all the talk about how much easier it is to recruit at Miami we’ve out recruited them on average over the last dozen years, and haven’t had classes as bad as theirs even during the Helf downturn.

Impressive class for Arizona given their circumstances. They got a handful of recruits I would prefer were Ducks. Whomp whomp for Washington and Arizona State.

alxtw wrote:

ducks5ever wrote:

RanDux wrote:Even with all their fire power, USC finished a dismal 10th in the Pac-12 at #65 overall, finishing ahead of only UW and that train wreck of a program, ASU.

While that is what 247 says, I don't think it accurately portrays what's going on. USC signed 8 guys but took 13 transfers. There's no way a 21 person class of that caliber is #65.

Transfers arent included in the rankings?

Correct