Re: Pac-12/Big 10/Big 12 Realignment
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:36 am
It makes sense to add a couple more west coast teams so the LA schools aren’t flying across the country every other week.
Oregon Ducks Sports Message Board Forum
https://ducksattack.com/forum/
It was a conference formed in 1921 that included 23 teams by 1929 but split into the SEC in 1932 and then the ACC in 1953. The SoCon is now just an FCS conference.lmduck wrote:What is the 1920's SoCon way?DuckzRule wrote:I'm actually surprised that the Big Ten finds some value in Oregon according to the sources that contacted Brett McMurphy, but I think that the conference won't add all the rumored teams unless they want to go the 1920's SoCon way.greenyellow wrote:
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I am no expert and have zero sources so this is only conjecture on my part, I think there is/was a very calculated reason the B10 commissioner said they are not done with expansion when he spoke yesterday. There was clearly some posturing IMO.UOducksTK1 wrote:It makes sense to add a couple more west coast teams so the LA schools aren’t flying across the country every other week.
greenyellow wrote:It was a conference formed in 1921 that included 23 teams by 1929 but split into the SEC in 1932 and then the ACC in 1953. The SoCon is now just an FCS conference.lmduck wrote:What is the 1920's SoCon way?DuckzRule wrote:I'm actually surprised that the Big Ten finds some value in Oregon according to the sources that contacted Brett McMurphy, but I think that the conference won't add all the rumored teams unless they want to go the 1920's SoCon way.greenyellow wrote:
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's probably better if people follow Big Ten insider Greg Flugaur (https://twitter.com/flugempire) over Big 12 guy MHver3.
MHver3 has been tweeting stuff for two weeks now and claims to have sources. He also posted a couple of days ago that he had ‘ huge scoop’. Guess what ? He had nothing. He is a guy in West Virginia and multiple people have said he knows nothing.greenyellow wrote:It's probably better if people follow Big Ten insider Greg Flugaur (https://twitter.com/flugempire) over Big 12 guy MHver3.
If my options as a fan are:buckmarkduck wrote:
100 years later we now have the transportation to make any size conference.
Also I've heard the NBC part may mean something for Notre Dame.greenyellow wrote:Looks like the Big Ten may have deals with Fox, CBS, and NBC to carry games, potentially leaving ESPN without any games. That may help the Pac-12, ACC, and Big 12 as ESPN looks to keep as many games in the fold as possible.
This is huge for the Pac-12. ESPN has the most reason to have a full slate of games every week. CBS and NBC can get away with showing one or two games a week, but ESPN can't and maintain its image of being the worldwide leader in sports. If Kliavkoff can get a decent offer from Apple, Amazon, or some other streaming service, ESPN will have no choice but to go "all-in" on getting the Pac-12 rights. I'd LOVE to see ESPN overpay to keep the Pac. If they don't, would be looking at the Mountain West to fill out their schedule.greenyellow wrote:Looks like the Big Ten may have deals with Fox, CBS, and NBC to carry games, potentially leaving ESPN without any games. That may help the Pac-12, ACC, and Big 12 as ESPN looks to keep as many games in the fold as possible.