Page 1 of 1

97 PFs

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2022 10:33 am
by jibbajabba614
Tim Duncan B C- C B- B- A (Restricted to post)
In contrast to contemporary prep-to-pro players like KG, Jermaine O’Neal and TMac, Duncan stayed in college for all four years. During that period, he was a two-time ACC Player of the Year and a three-time NABC Defensive Player of the Year. By his sophomore year, he was considered a top five pick. Ready now player with room to grow. Great shot blocker. Amazing rebounder. Offensively, great mid range game. Nicknamed the Big Fundamental due to being an all around player. Amazing potential

Keith Van Horn C+ B- C C+ B- A (Restricted to post)
Van Horn is multi-talented and stands out on both ends of the floor. Great jumper. On the defensive end he can change the game with his length in the lane. He’s quick off his feet and covers ground well. His skill set makes him better suited for playing outside style; scouts could see him playing the center position. Amazing raw potential

Danny Fortson C+ D D C+ C+ A
He’s got a strong build and a overall nice level frame and all the athleticism in the world. Fortson can handle the perimeter and make plays for himself and for teammates but he’s also a force in the paint, a solid rebounder and and strong defensive presence. Amazing raw potential

Austin Croshere C+ B- C B- C+ B
A sweet shooting big with good size. Plays a complete game but is especially dangerous from 3pt land. May be better suited for the small forward position. Good potential

Maurice Taylor B- C- D+ B- C+ B
Mo is an intriguing athlete who flashes big upside. He can play on the wing or bang in the paint and he looks the part of any mid level tier prospect. Good potential

Jerald Honeycutt C+ C D+ B- B- B
Jack of all trades defender who can guard anywhere on the court while also being able to create turnovers. He is just average at everything but with any growth, he can become a very good defensive option. Good potential.

Gordon Malone C+ C C C+ C+ B
Undersized PF who moves quicker than most for his position but lacks technique needed to become elite. Good attacker but needs to improve. Average defender and rebounder. Good potential.

Dejan Tomašević C+ D D C+ B A
Top rebounder in the Euro league so his rebounding skills will translate well but needs to improve his offense and defense to become a more complete player. Great potential.

Chris Crawford C+ B C- B C C
Great jump shooter but needs to improve finishing in the post and extending beyond the three point line. Moves smoothly and is quicker than other PF’s but lacks strength to hang in the post. Good defender. Average potential.

Re: 97 PFs

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2022 7:38 pm
by pistolpetejr
KVH - do his notes mean he can play SF but only in an outside offense? Sorry, confused by the “Restricted to post” caveat in tandem with the notes.

Re: 97 PFs

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2022 7:40 pm
by Craig
Means he can only play PF or C

Re: 97 PFs

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2022 7:54 pm
by jibbajabba614
pistolpetejr wrote:KVH - do his notes mean he can play SF but only in an outside offense? Sorry, confused by the “Restricted to post” caveat in tandem with the notes.
Yeah Ownage makes final restrictions. Sometimes I make guys restricted because they simmed so well. Pippen for instance simmed amazing as a SG and when you do multiple sims seasons u can’t control the depth charts.

Re: 97 PFs

Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2022 12:37 am
by Zyme
God can you imagine if Duncan was SF eligible, he would break this engine.

Re: 97 PFs

Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2022 1:20 pm
by lukeyrid13
KVH would be a lot more attractive if he was SF eligible.

Re: 97 PFs

Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2022 11:52 pm
by jibbajabba614
Honestly I would of liked them to be SF eligible. Would of made top 3 tough and top 6 tough.


Really deep draft

Re: 97 PFs

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2022 6:39 am
by Oregon Ownage
lukeyrid13 wrote:KVH would be a lot more attractive if he was SF eligible.
Trying to limit game breaking players who can play down at SF. Looking to have more natural SF being starters there rather than converted down PFs

Re: 97 PFs

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2022 12:06 pm
by lukeyrid13
Oregon Ownage wrote:
lukeyrid13 wrote:KVH would be a lot more attractive if he was SF eligible.
Trying to limit game breaking players who can play down at SF. Looking to have more natural SF being starters there rather than converted down PFs
Yeah I totally understand the reasoning for it

In 1.0 we had Dennis Rodman getting 13 rebounds a game at SF and Karl Malone getting like 22/11. I had Robert Horry who got like 4 blocks a game predominantly at SF. So I totally get not wanting guys who can take advantage of playing down.