Ducks Attack Message Board Forum

See attachments for the 3rd edition of the GM Rankings.

I have the previous GM rankings (versions #1-#2) included for reference and also did a current polling of 5 GM's to arrive at the "GM Poll Rankings" on the far right. Enjoy!

Tiers 1/2 below since I can only attach 3 things per post.

Not even full rankings. +3.

Also Boom is really volatile in these rankings lmao

I'm confused by the GM Poll Rankings on the right? What's that exactly?

pistolpetejr wrote:I'm confused by the GM Poll Rankings on the right? What's that exactly?

He asked some GMs to make a list and that is their result.

Man, wild that I got to the ECF and dropped like 12 spots in the rankings.

Cellar-door wrote:

pistolpetejr wrote:I'm confused by the GM Poll Rankings on the right? What's that exactly?

He asked some GMs to make a list and that is their result.

Man, wild that I got to the ECF and dropped like 12 spots in the rankings.

Ah okay that makes sense. I thought it was GMs' opinions, but wasn't sure. Makes sense now that I know not everyone was polled.

The Lakers' ranking and GM Poll Ranking are drastically different.

Cellar-door wrote:

pistolpetejr wrote:I'm confused by the GM Poll Rankings on the right? What's that exactly?

He asked some GMs to make a list and that is their result.

Man, wild that I got to the ECF and dropped like 12 spots in the rankings.

Just too nefarious.

Tbf though the GM rankings ranked you considerably higher. Heck, I was probably the lowest if your overall ranking was 12, and mine was still above your final ranking.

The Bean Regime wrote:

Cellar-door wrote:

pistolpetejr wrote:I'm confused by the GM Poll Rankings on the right? What's that exactly?

He asked some GMs to make a list and that is their result.

Man, wild that I got to the ECF and dropped like 12 spots in the rankings.

Just too nefarious.

Tbf though the GM rankings ranked you considerably higher. Heck, I was probably the lowest if your overall ranking was 12, and mine was still above your final ranking.

I think it's partially a difference in approach. I build good teams, and don't do multi-season tanks, or mortgage out multiple future years that often that means a lot of ECF and ECSF teams, but no title, on the other hand it means fewer multi-season dry spells as well.

updated second post to include tiers 1/2. enjoy!

I think the Nets GM is too low.

"If you cheat on a test and get an A, don't you deserve the A because you figured out a way to beat the system?"

No. The answer is no, you don't.

Where's Kings GM?

lukeyrid13 wrote:

Craig wrote:I think the Nets GM is too low.

Craig is like a good insult comic. He just comes in quickly and slyly roasts folks (often myself).

This is....surprisingly...sane. I'd say honestly fairly spot on overall. I think you could argue the Celtics above me with 2 titles to my 1, but I did saddle them down with the Barkley contract, which has been a real killer.

I'd agree about the Pistons being the most unlucky squad

Also, the Twolves are welcome to join my cult any time

Ha^

I think what's more concerning is having 800wins over me..