Kings/Bucks

Post Completed Trades Here

Moderators: UOducksTK1, Zyme, lukeyrid13, Oregon Ownage

User avatar
jibbajabba614
Senior
Posts: 2410
Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 6:32 pm
GM: Milwaukee Bucks GM

Kings/Bucks

Post by jibbajabba614 »

Alain Digbeu For Henderson and Kings 99 1st (unprotected)

Deal was contingent on Kidd resigning…

Originally was before F/A but without Kidd, Kings pick would of looked like a top 5 pick. Now it’s still a lottery pick. But I’m sure he’ll find a way to make some moves…
JB
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 394
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2022 6:49 pm

Re: Kings/Bucks

Post by JB »

Agree. I'm not making any real moves though. Just didn't think we were bad enough to tank with Kidd, and I didn't want to trade Kidd after looking around at the lack of scoring options at PG across the league.

I like Digbeu a lot. Scored a decent chunk efficiently for a good Bucks team. Think he's a nice young piece who fits the timeline who is a lot better than whoever we could have got with out pick anyway
Kings
User avatar
pistolpetejr
Senior
Posts: 2971
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2014 2:48 pm
GM: Los Angeles Clippers

Re: Kings/Bucks

Post by pistolpetejr »

Nice. I like.

Bucks accumulating assets while improving their tank this year, Kings basically replacing some of Spree’s scoring.
---
Image

PistolPeteJR
User avatar
lukeyrid13
All-American
Posts: 10475
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
GM: Portland TrailBlazers

Re: Kings/Bucks

Post by lukeyrid13 »

I like that the kings didn’t have to trade any of their 3 lotto picks but Bucks getting unprotected pick is nice too
User avatar
Oregon Ownage
All-American
Posts: 15301
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:40 am
GM: Dallas Mavericks
Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia

Re: Kings/Bucks

Post by Oregon Ownage »

Done
Image
User avatar
Craig
Senior
Posts: 2418
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:16 pm
GM: Phoenix Suns GM

Re: Kings/Bucks

Post by Craig »

lukeyrid13 wrote:I like that the kings didn’t have to trade any of their 3 lotto picks but Bucks getting unprotected pick is nice too
Why would a known lotto pick be on the table?
SUNS GM
User avatar
lukeyrid13
All-American
Posts: 10475
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
GM: Portland TrailBlazers

Re: Kings/Bucks

Post by lukeyrid13 »

Craig wrote:
lukeyrid13 wrote:I like that the kings didn’t have to trade any of their 3 lotto picks but Bucks getting unprotected pick is nice too
Why would a known lotto pick be on the table?
Bucks said it would take 3 picks to get Digbeu


Not crazy to assume he would ask kings for at least one of their recent top picks
User avatar
jibbajabba614
Senior
Posts: 2410
Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 6:32 pm
GM: Milwaukee Bucks GM

Re: Kings/Bucks

Post by jibbajabba614 »

lukeyrid13 wrote:
Craig wrote:
lukeyrid13 wrote:I like that the kings didn’t have to trade any of their 3 lotto picks but Bucks getting unprotected pick is nice too
Why would a known lotto pick be on the table?
Bucks said it would take 3 picks to get Digbeu


Not crazy to assume he would ask kings for at least one of their recent top picks
Nah, I just didn’t want two late 20’s picks for him…. I would of taken 3 late 1st’s though. I try to be fair
User avatar
Craig
Senior
Posts: 2418
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:16 pm
GM: Phoenix Suns GM

Re: Kings/Bucks

Post by Craig »

lukeyrid13 wrote:
Craig wrote:
lukeyrid13 wrote:I like that the kings didn’t have to trade any of their 3 lotto picks but Bucks getting unprotected pick is nice too
Why would a known lotto pick be on the table?
Bucks said it would take 3 picks to get Digbeu


Not crazy to assume he would ask kings for at least one of their recent top picks
Asking for it doesnt make it a price worth paying :lol:
SUNS GM
User avatar
lukeyrid13
All-American
Posts: 10475
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
GM: Portland TrailBlazers

Re: Kings/Bucks

Post by lukeyrid13 »

^ I agree

I suppose my comment should have been I’m surprised the bucks reduced their price so quickly
User avatar
jibbajabba614
Senior
Posts: 2410
Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 6:32 pm
GM: Milwaukee Bucks GM

Re: Kings/Bucks

Post by jibbajabba614 »

lukeyrid13 wrote:^ I agree

I suppose my comment should have been I’m surprised the bucks reduced their price so quickly
Digbeu was amazing last year. +2 in scoring on his first TC. If he gets another +2 your talking about Michael Jordan scoring with no defense.

Kings wanted to do deal before Kidd resigned, but we made sure with Ownage and he said to wait until Kidd resigned. I more less did it cause I want to see how he produces with a point guard
User avatar
Craig
Senior
Posts: 2418
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:16 pm
GM: Phoenix Suns GM

Re: Kings/Bucks

Post by Craig »

lukeyrid13 wrote:^ I agree

I suppose my comment should have been I’m surprised the bucks reduced their price so quickly
The initial price for Dig was outrageous so I guess Im just not with you on the surprise in price reduction lol
SUNS GM
User avatar
pistolpetejr
Senior
Posts: 2971
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2014 2:48 pm
GM: Los Angeles Clippers

Re: Kings/Bucks

Post by pistolpetejr »

Craig wrote:
lukeyrid13 wrote:^ I agree

I suppose my comment should have been I’m surprised the bucks reduced their price so quickly
The initial price for Dig was outrageous so I guess Im just not with you on the surprise in price reduction lol
I agree with this. It was quite out there. That said, I don’t blame him for overshooting I guess.
---
Image

PistolPeteJR
User avatar
jibbajabba614
Senior
Posts: 2410
Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 6:32 pm
GM: Milwaukee Bucks GM

Re: Kings/Bucks

Post by jibbajabba614 »

pistolpetejr wrote:
Craig wrote:
lukeyrid13 wrote:^ I agree

I suppose my comment should have been I’m surprised the bucks reduced their price so quickly
The initial price for Dig was outrageous so I guess Im just not with you on the surprise in price reduction lol
I agree with this. It was quite out there. That said, I don’t blame him for overshooting I guess.
Yup, I didn’t need to move him. Originally plan was to build around Bradley, Peja and Digs..

Unless I was getting positive value, I didn’t plan to move him. I took negative value back for Big Dog but I got my pick back. So instead of being building a 1st round exit team, I got to build a losing roster now instead of next off season.

At this point with all my picks, late 20’s 1sts would be negative value for me. Kings pick is a risk. Yeah he was second seed but he also lost Spree for 3 rookies. So he needs to have a great TC.

Again I didn’t need to move Digbeu but Kings offered a fair deal.
User avatar
dd10snoop28
All Pac-12
Posts: 5046
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:06 am
GM: New Jersey Nets GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Kings/Bucks

Post by dd10snoop28 »

Craig wrote:
lukeyrid13 wrote:^ I agree

I suppose my comment should have been I’m surprised the bucks reduced their price so quickly
The initial price for Dig was outrageous so I guess Im just not with you on the surprise in price reduction lol
^ this.

don't understand doing a rebuild and then trading for Digbeu.
Image
Post Reply