2023 NFL Draft Thread
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2023 5:39 pm
Figured we should have a thread to discuss the NFL Draft besides talking about just former Ducks picked.
Oregon Ducks Sports Message Board Forum
https://ducksattack.com/forum/
While I dislike the Seahawks immensely, I don’t know how you came to that conclusion. They got what many consider the CB1 and WR1 in the draft. Both can help them. Much worse picks so far, for instance:OregonFan4Life wrote:Seahawks with the dumbest pick of all IMO.
Had a brain fart, meant to say Colts, no idea why I said Hawks, though they should’ve taken Gonzo over Witherspoon IMO.droop10 wrote:While I dislike the Seahawks immensely, I don’t know how you came to that conclusion. They got what many consider the CB1 and WR1 in the draft. Both can help them. Much worse picks so far, for instance:OregonFan4Life wrote:Seahawks with the dumbest pick of all IMO.
1) Falcons take RB when they have a ton of holes to fill and has Algeier produce.
2). Both of the Lions picks - just bad positional value, and they already have a decent RB room. Could have used that pick to fill some other holes. Plus an ILB that again has low positional value and likely would have been available to them later in the draft.
3) Packers taking Van Ness. Raw prospect, never even started in college, plus they could really use weapons for Love, but they insist on never drafting weapons for their QBs early.
Eh, the Colts desperately needed a QB, and Richardson is the ultimate boom or bust. The Colts new head coach tailored an offense around Jalen Hurts’ strengths, and Richardson has a similar skill set. Think it’s a good match, and at least gives Richardson a little better chance at success. Witherspoon is pretty damn good and fits Carroll’s scheme well, so I get why they went that route. Gonzalez found a nice home in New England.OregonFan4Life wrote:Had a brain fart, meant to say Colts, no idea why I said Hawks, though they should’ve taken Gonzo over Witherspoon IMO.droop10 wrote:While I dislike the Seahawks immensely, I don’t know how you came to that conclusion. They got what many consider the CB1 and WR1 in the draft. Both can help them. Much worse picks so far, for instance:OregonFan4Life wrote:Seahawks with the dumbest pick of all IMO.
1) Falcons take RB when they have a ton of holes to fill and has Algeier produce.
2). Both of the Lions picks - just bad positional value, and they already have a decent RB room. Could have used that pick to fill some other holes. Plus an ILB that again has low positional value and likely would have been available to them later in the draft.
3) Packers taking Van Ness. Raw prospect, never even started in college, plus they could really use weapons for Love, but they insist on never drafting weapons for their QBs early.
I think taking a project QB that high is dumb, Richardson is just another Jamarcus Russell.
NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NOgreenyellow wrote:Utah TE Dalton Kincaid going to Buffalo is one of the best steals of the first round. The Chargers getting Quentin Johnston seems like a good fit for Herbert, who needed another WR alongside Williams and Allen.
I'll second this.Duck07 wrote:NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NOgreenyellow wrote:Utah TE Dalton Kincaid going to Buffalo is one of the best steals of the first round. The Chargers getting Quentin Johnston seems like a good fit for Herbert, who needed another WR alongside Williams and Allen.
If he booms, great, I'm an idiot. I think its a terrible fit and does nothing to change the WR room in any way. They just drafted more of the same and his H/L aren't that great because its all spread nonsense that doesn't play next level.
N'Keal Harry 2.0