Chris Martin to Cal
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 1:42 pm
Big get for them, hopefully that steers the DEs we're both after more in our direction.
Oregon Ducks Sports Message Board Forum
https://ducksattack.com/forum/
You remember we are 2-3 against Cal the past 5 years, right?dthomas=ddixon wrote:Big recruits going there doesn't really bother me. Isn't that team full of 'em every year? & what have they ever accomplished? Trademarking the fade? They don't worry me. This is great news for us though. Now we have a decent chance to land both Gabe & Owa. That would be a dream come true.
True, but at least two of those W's were real flukey. Could be 5-0 or 0-5....maxduck wrote:You remember we are 2-3 against Cal the past 5 years, right?dthomas=ddixon wrote:Big recruits going there doesn't really bother me. Isn't that team full of 'em every year? & what have they ever accomplished? Trademarking the fade? They don't worry me. This is great news for us though. Now we have a decent chance to land both Gabe & Owa. That would be a dream come true.
Of those years how many times has Cal finished above us in conference?maxduck wrote:You remember we are 2-3 against Cal the past 5 years, right?dthomas=ddixon wrote:Big recruits going there doesn't really bother me. Isn't that team full of 'em every year? & what have they ever accomplished? Trademarking the fade? They don't worry me. This is great news for us though. Now we have a decent chance to land both Gabe & Owa. That would be a dream come true.
So you mean the type of game where a blue chip athlete, maybe a 5* defensive end, could be the difference between a win or loss?bigsugarduck wrote:True, but at least two of those W's were real flukey. Could be 5-0 or 0-5....maxduck wrote:You remember we are 2-3 against Cal the past 5 years, right?dthomas=ddixon wrote:Big recruits going there doesn't really bother me. Isn't that team full of 'em every year? & what have they ever accomplished? Trademarking the fade? They don't worry me. This is great news for us though. Now we have a decent chance to land both Gabe & Owa. That would be a dream come true.
Thats a good point.maxduck wrote: So you mean the type of game where a blue chip athlete, maybe a 5* defensive end, could be the difference between a win or loss?
Everybody is entitled to their opinion. I see Cal as a formidable opponent, both on the recruiting trail and the field.
Grrrrrrr, I haven't heard that dreaded name for a while. EZEFF, so close yet so far!!!woundedknees wrote:Or a Cal DB named Marcus Ezeff, who admittted he was playing harder on that play after getting burned earler?
How about Oklahoma's LB Clint Ingram intercepting Brady Leaf late in the 2005 Holiday? Ingram admitted he was out of position for the D called on that play.
Sometimes game changing plays are just great players being in the right place at the right time, regardless of star ratings.
The Cal offensive coordinator is the position that is lacking. I don't understand how Jeff Tedford keeps getting duds to run the offense, and no production from the QB position.bigsugarduck wrote:Thats a good point.maxduck wrote: So you mean the type of game where a blue chip athlete, maybe a 5* defensive end, could be the difference between a win or loss?
Everybody is entitled to their opinion. I see Cal as a formidable opponent, both on the recruiting trail and the field.
I will say I'm more confident in our coaching top to bottom than Cal. Oregon is the second most successful program in the pac10 due to top 2-3 coaching and top 5-6 talent on a yearly basis. I'm not sold at all on Cal's rotating door of mediocre coordinators and Tedford's inability to snag top position coaches. Case in point, Tosh Lopoi (spelling?) thier D-line coach.
I've said this before, but the dude has very little experience coaching and is only in his mid 20's. He was a good player for Cal a few years back, but that does not mean you can or should coach. It would be like us hiring Rashad Bauman as our new Secondary coach if Neal left. Love Rashad but no way does he deserve to be a position coach at a top 20 program (yet).