Ducks Attack Message Board Forum

Not surprised here...http://recruiting.scout.com/a.z?s=73&p= ... id=3932640

I almost always prefer the talent go to UCLA than Cal.

UOducksTK1 wrote:I almost always prefer the talent go to UCLA than Cal.

Ditto... UCLA is much better at wasting their talent than Cal is.

oreducks77 wrote:

UOducksTK1 wrote:I almost always prefer the talent go to UCLA than Cal.

Ditto... UCLA is much better at wasting their talent than Cal is.

I don't know, Cal has wasted some great talent the last few years. Right now UCLA is wasting talent but I think they are getting better and could become even better depending on how things at USC go.

gofightingducks wrote:

oreducks77 wrote:

UOducksTK1 wrote:I almost always prefer the talent go to UCLA than Cal.

Ditto... UCLA is much better at wasting their talent than Cal is.

I don't know, Cal has wasted some great talent the last few years. Right now UCLA is wasting talent but I think they are getting better and could become even better depending on how things at USC go.

I completely agree. UCLA's potential scares me. After the sting together a couple of bowl wins, they are going to be able to recruit with any team in the country. Besides tradition, they have everything that USC can offer a recruit and more (much much better location, beautiful campus, better academics, etc.).

The Weasel's wasted a lot of talent where ever he goes.

Hopefully this could help us w/ Muli?!?

Probably not but ya never know! I know UCLA already has a lot of recruits locked up and apparently Heimuli -- at least last week -- was down to them and us...

uo2010 wrote:

gofightingducks wrote:

oreducks77 wrote:

UOducksTK1 wrote:I almost always prefer the talent go to UCLA than Cal.

Ditto... UCLA is much better at wasting their talent than Cal is.

I don't know, Cal has wasted some great talent the last few years. Right now UCLA is wasting talent but I think they are getting better and could become even better depending on how things at USC go.

I completely agree. UCLA's potential scares me. After the sting together a couple of bowl wins, they are going to be able to recruit with any team in the country. Besides tradition, they have everything that USC can offer a recruit and more (much much better location, beautiful campus, better academics, etc.).

Without a good QB, I can't ever see them being a threat. Their defense will always be good, let them have Marsh.

UOducksTK1 wrote:

uo2010 wrote:

gofightingducks wrote:

oreducks77 wrote:

UOducksTK1 wrote:I almost always prefer the talent go to UCLA than Cal.

Ditto... UCLA is much better at wasting their talent than Cal is.

I don't know, Cal has wasted some great talent the last few years. Right now UCLA is wasting talent but I think they are getting better and could become even better depending on how things at USC go.

I completely agree. UCLA's potential scares me. After the sting together a couple of bowl wins, they are going to be able to recruit with any team in the country. Besides tradition, they have everything that USC can offer a recruit and more (much much better location, beautiful campus, better academics, etc.).

Without a good QB, I can't ever see them being a threat. Their defense will always be good, let them have Marsh.

ya but i think this will be a stud at ucla.. eventually ucla will be competing again
http://rivals.yahoo.com/ucla/football/r ... haut-66690