Page 1 of 1

2011 Rivals 100

Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 11:45 am
by dthomas=ddixon
http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/r ... /rank-2640

Colt at 80, Yruretagoyena at 81, Scarlett at 86. I was kinda hoping to see Tyson Coleman make the list but I'm sure he'll still be a 4* when they finish out the rankings. All in all a lot of Duck targets on the list. There doesn't seem to be as many as last year though.

Re: 2011 Rivals 100

Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 11:53 am
by fecta23
Coleman didnt even make the top 250... hopefully he'll be a 4*

Re: 2011 Rivals 100

Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 12:09 pm
by dthomas=ddixon
fecta23 wrote:Coleman didnt even make the top 250... hopefully he'll be a 4*
Really... Wasn't he sick all last season with mono & didn't play much? That could be why. Either way I'm not too worried, I think Coleman's gonna be a beast.

I find it funny that this kid from portland with his one offer (beevs) makes it in the top 200 & is a 4* though: http://rivals.yahoo.com/footballrecruit ... tQDwNGPZB4

Compare Alex Mitchell's offer list with Kasen Williams', who squeeks into rivals top 250 at 246: http://rivals.yahoo.com/footballrecruit ... HIGWRGPZB4

Recruiting rankings, especially this early, crack me up.

Re: 2011 Rivals 100

Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 12:56 pm
by briarduck
Ya I will sick to offer lists for now...that list seems a little whack!

I agree Tyson seems like a good one and less recruiting hype might be better for him and us ;)

GO DUCKS!!

Re: 2011 Rivals 100

Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 1:36 pm
by PDXShogun
Don't be surprised if Alex Mitchell doesn't end up with a few pretty good offers, including UO. USC has been up to visit him.

Kasen Williams is interesting. Scout has him #1 receiver, ESPN has him in the 80's overall, and he barely makes the Rivals 250. The Scout rating is probably due to that Seattle bias but looking at his offer list the rivals rating is waaaay too low. ESPN is probably the closest.

Re: 2011 Rivals 100

Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 2:50 pm
by hines
PDXShogun wrote:Don't be surprised if Alex Mitchell doesn't end up with a few pretty good offers, including UO. USC has been up to visit him.

Kasen Williams is interesting. Scout has him #1 receiver, ESPN has him in the 80's overall, and he barely makes the Rivals 250. The Scout rating is probably due to that Seattle bias but looking at his offer list the rivals rating is waaaay too low. ESPN is probably the closest.
uh...why is there a "seattle" bias when Scout is based in Tennessee? fetters and someone else does rank NW kids but he doesn't have the final say. ESPN/Scout/Rivals all have different rankings. why are people still surprised at this? why are some concerned about PRE-SEASON rankings of players? you guy do realize those rankings will change right? doesn't ANYONE realize this happens EVER YEAR? :roll:

Re: 2011 Rivals 100

Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 3:05 pm
by UOducksTK1
dthomas=ddixon wrote:
fecta23 wrote:Coleman didnt even make the top 250... hopefully he'll be a 4*
Really... Wasn't he sick all last season with mono & didn't play much? That could be why. Either way I'm not too worried, I think Coleman's gonna be a beast.

I find it funny that this kid from portland with his one offer (beevs) makes it in the top 200 & is a 4* though: http://rivals.yahoo.com/footballrecruit ... tQDwNGPZB4

Compare Alex Mitchell's offer list with Kasen Williams', who squeeks into rivals top 250 at 246: http://rivals.yahoo.com/footballrecruit ... HIGWRGPZB4

Recruiting rankings, especially this early, crack me up.
Lol Kasen got ripped, that offer list alone should make him a top 100 recruit.

Re: 2011 Rivals 100

Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 3:14 pm
by uodux1212
hines wrote: uh...why is there a "seattle" bias when Scout is based in Tennessee? fetters and someone else does rank NW kids but he doesn't have the final say. ESPN/Scout/Rivals all have different rankings. why are people still surprised at this? why are some concerned about PRE-SEASON rankings of players? you guy do realize those rankings will change right? doesn't ANYONE realize this happens EVER YEAR? :roll:
Everyone loves a know it all....

Re: 2011 Rivals 100

Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 3:15 pm
by PDXShogun
hines wrote:
PDXShogun wrote:Don't be surprised if Alex Mitchell doesn't end up with a few pretty good offers, including UO. USC has been up to visit him.

Kasen Williams is interesting. Scout has him #1 receiver, ESPN has him in the 80's overall, and he barely makes the Rivals 250. The Scout rating is probably due to that Seattle bias but looking at his offer list the rivals rating is waaaay too low. ESPN is probably the closest.
uh...why is there a "seattle" bias when Scout is based in Tennessee? fetters and someone else does rank NW kids but he doesn't have the final say. ESPN/Scout/Rivals all have different rankings. why are people still surprised at this? why are some concerned about PRE-SEASON rankings of players? you guy do realize those rankings will change right? doesn't ANYONE realize this happens EVER YEAR? :roll:
Rivals is based in Tennessee. Scout is based in Seattle.

Re: 2011 Rivals 100

Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 4:54 pm
by hines
PDXShogun wrote:
hines wrote:
PDXShogun wrote:Don't be surprised if Alex Mitchell doesn't end up with a few pretty good offers, including UO. USC has been up to visit him.

Kasen Williams is interesting. Scout has him #1 receiver, ESPN has him in the 80's overall, and he barely makes the Rivals 250. The Scout rating is probably due to that Seattle bias but looking at his offer list the rivals rating is waaaay too low. ESPN is probably the closest.
uh...why is there a "seattle" bias when Scout is based in Tennessee? fetters and someone else does rank NW kids but he doesn't have the final say. ESPN/Scout/Rivals all have different rankings. why are people still surprised at this? why are some concerned about PRE-SEASON rankings of players? you guy do realize those rankings will change right? doesn't ANYONE realize this happens EVER YEAR? :roll:
Rivals is based in Tennessee. Scout is based in Seattle.
yep. my bad. but fetters doesn't have final say on star ranking for recruits. no ranking is ever right. scout has one guy at #8, rivals has him at #22 while ESPN might have the kid at #4. is there that big of a ranking from 4 to 8? nope. from 4 to 22? yeah, but not much. there is rarely a can't miss #1 all world/player that deserves the ranking. the #1 DT from 2005 who went to Texas (surprise!) just got released from the seahawks last week. dude was a free agent.