Page 1 of 1

A QB vote is in order for someone with the know-how to do so

Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 7:50 am
by UofDuck
Jerrard Randall
Brett Hundley
Marcus Mariota

your favorite?, or best for Oregon?, most needed?, we end up? with.... whatever. Just curious to see what people think of the three.

I'd do it myself, but have no clue how.

Re: A QB vote is in order for someone with the know-how to do so

Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 8:30 am
by bigsugarduck
I dont know much about football but I do know a little about physics ( I stress the little here folks :D), and from what I know about mass and inertia I like Hundley the best. He Just seems to have superior size and bulk compared to the other two. Specifically, Mariota seems to have the Dennis Dixon freakishly skinny thing going on. :?
1. Hundley
2. Randall
3. Mariota

Re: A QB vote is in order for someone with the know-how to do so

Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 10:05 am
by jimmy12
I am sorry. I know a few things about dumb and that question is just plain dumb. You base your entire assessment about the potential of these guys based on size. Dumb questions deserve sacarstic responses. So, here you go.

Re: A QB vote is in order for someone with the know-how to do so

Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 10:49 am
by neezy3
Rivals stated that Randall was the best dual threat qb in broward county. If we can start taking the best athletes out of the miami area i will be very impressed scott frost is quickly becoming one of our best recruiters. Same goes for mariota, there is also a 4 star ol on his team (St. Louis) we are in the top 5 for and the poly connection is also huge. Hundley might be the best and most prototypical of the group but not sure where we stand there.

Re: A QB vote is in order for someone with the know-how to do so

Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 11:14 am
by GrandpaDuck
My favorite is m->X. He is going to be terrific. m->Y is going to be terrific too and is such a good athlete that he might even play another position if he doesn't beat out m->X. With regards to m->Z I had serious questions about him and didn't want him anyway.



X = The first guy to get his LOI faxed in on National Signing Day.
Y = The second guy to get his LOI faxed in on National Signing Day.
Z = The guy who ends up signing with someone else.

Re: A QB vote is in order for someone with the know-how to do so

Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 11:16 am
by greenyellow
GrandpaDuck wrote:My favorite is m->X. He is going to be terrific. m->Y is going to be terrific too and is such a good athlete that he might even play another position if he doesn't beat out m->X. With regards to m->Z I had serious questions about him and didn't want him anyway.



X = The first guy to get his LOI faxed in on National Signing Day.
Y = The second guy to get his LOI faxed in on National Signing Day.
Z = The guy who ends up signing with someone else.
+1

Re: A QB vote is in order for someone with the know-how to do so

Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 3:13 pm
by dthomas=ddixon
GrandpaDuck wrote:My favorite is m->X. He is going to be terrific. m->Y is going to be terrific too and is such a good athlete that he might even play another position if he doesn't beat out m->X. With regards to m->Z I had serious questions about him and didn't want him anyway.



X = The first guy to get his LOI faxed in on National Signing Day.
Y = The second guy to get his LOI faxed in on National Signing Day.
Z = The guy who ends up signing with someone else.
:lol: So true.

Re: A QB vote is in order for someone with the know-how to do so

Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 4:09 pm
by bigsugarduck
jimmy12 wrote:I am sorry. I know a few things about dumb and that question is just plain dumb. You base your entire assessment about the potential of these guys based on size. Dumb questions deserve sacarstic responses. So, here you go.
I think you are responding to my comment Jimmy, though I have no idea why you refer to it as a question and not a comment (which some might construe as a "dumb" mistake by the way).

Do I really need to defend my comment? Seriously, someone woke up on the cranky side of the bed this morning didn't they? ;) If you honestly think that was even an assessment let alone my "entire assessment" then you overanalyzed my words. :lol: Did I even claim to be a football expert? Uhh no. By all accounts Hundly is an impressive athlete AND he has a strong frame. Personally I like the idea of a thicker QB running this offense (such as a Masoli or Tebow).

So what is your assessment Jimmy since you clearly know so much? ;)

Re: A QB vote is in order for someone with the know-how to do so

Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 11:09 pm
by thegreenstain
According to jhop, the Oregon coaches view these three quarterbacks in the following order...

1.Hundley
2.Mariota
3.Randall

Re: A QB vote is in order for someone with the know-how to do so

Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 1:22 am
by akili1133
Hundley is the one I really want.

Re: A QB vote is in order for someone with the know-how to do so

Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 2:40 pm
by ducksrock
What about Masoli? I heard he is now available..... :roll:

Re: A QB vote is in order for someone with the know-how to do so

Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 4:56 pm
by hendrg
thegreenstain wrote:According to jhop, the Oregon coaches view these three quarterbacks in the following order...

1.Hundley
2.Mariota
3.Randall
That's actually how I feel, but something tells me Mariota is going to be the stud out of this group!

Re: A QB vote is in order for someone with the know-how to do so

Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 6:46 pm
by buckmarkduck
Ask me in 3 years who I like best, as it stands right now I like all three equally and feel each could be the future for the ducks, but it depends on who is willing to work the hardest. The one thing with HS highlight films, is we don't have a good gauge of there work ethic, each one is so much more superior to other HS kids that they may not even have to work all that hard to be the best player on the field. In the Pac-10 you find out who is willing to work hard (Patrick Chung), and who has all the athletic ability, but just won't work hard (cough cough, Jamere Holland).

That may sound like the PC answer, but I've seen to many supposed can't miss prospects, who never fulfill their potential, to know that there is no such thing.

Re: A QB vote is in order for someone with the know-how to do so

Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 8:05 pm
by duckgrad99
My guess is that Hundley is a longshot. I would be happy landing 2 of the 3.