Page 1 of 3
Manziel to a and m
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 8:52 pm
by chapelhillduck
Per Justin Hopkins twitter
the sky is not falling we are stacked at qb
Re: Manziel to a and m
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 9:01 pm
by sx1080
chapelhillduck wrote:Per Justin Hopkins twitter
the sky is not falling we are stacked at qb
concur. two QBs enough in this class.
Re: Manziel to a and m
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 9:03 pm
by karlhungis
That sucks.... Good luck to him though.
Re: Manziel to a and m
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 9:07 pm
by Hoagduck
What a shame. Did he not see the FIU game? Yeesh.
Soooo, theoretically the coaches would still take a 3rd QB right? Who's it gonna be?
Re: Manziel to a and m
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 9:10 pm
by PDXShogun
Seems like a good kid, too bad he'll regret this decision when the coaching staff gets fired. I don't see Mike Sherman lasting another four years.
Re: Manziel to a and m
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 9:26 pm
by Destroyer77
dropkick to the scrotum
Re: Manziel to a and m
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 9:31 pm
by ljginger
Someone please contact Brett Hundley and tell him we have only 2 qbs committed and he could compete for national title here and not suffer in UCLA...I would but I have no way of getting ahold of him...anyone?
Re: Manziel to a and m
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 10:26 pm
by yeahboyd
He is trying to get to the league. His best option is definitely the pistol offense...
Re: Manziel to a and m
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 10:26 pm
by neezy3
Re: Manziel to a and m
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 10:46 pm
by DarronThomas5
Randall and Mariota are both better in my honest opinion. Taking 3 qbs in one class is unrealistic and it means that at least one of those players would never see the field, we're better off giving that schollie to someone at another position. I knew one qb would inevitably decommitt and I was frankly hoping Manziel would be the one who did.
Re: Manziel to a and m
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 10:49 pm
by duckgrad99
He has a much better chance to start at A & M. Can't fault him for the decision. We always end up with good qb's so I'm not worried.
Re: Manziel to a and m
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 11:01 pm
by woundedknees
I am so... Not surprised.
Can't say I saw it coming, but the more that came out about his family situation, along with his obvious interest, the more likely this seemed.
Want to bet his stats get better?
Re: Manziel to a and m
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 11:03 pm
by Phenom
Meh...he was scared by competition. Do we really want a QB who's scared to compete?
Same with Hundley. Didn't he drop us after Randall outperformed him at the Elite 11 camp?
Re: Manziel to a and m
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 11:06 pm
by UOducksTK1
Bummer, the stats he was putting up was exciting. But in all honesty, Mariota, Manziel, and Randall could not have lasted. One of them had to go. And perhaps it's better Manziel goes instead of someone like Mariota who could potentially land in the Pac-10 still and come back to bite us.
Sucks to hear cuz Manziel sounded like a quality player and person, but I'm still content with Randall and Mariota.
Re: Manziel to a and m
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 11:07 pm
by ducks2314
Through four games this fall, Manziel has led the Antlers to a 3-1 record while accounting for nearly 90% of Tivy’s total offense. He’s 107-of-164 passing (65% completion rate) for 1,399 yards and 15 TD’s. On the ground, Johnny has already amassed 612 yards and 10 TD’s on 82 carries (7.5 yards per attempt).