Ducks Attack Message Board Forum

http://oregon.scout.com/a.z?s=128&p=2&c ... 13586.html

http://oregon.scout.com/a.z?s=128&p=8&c=1&nid=5053578

6'2 225 2* MLB.

Oregon is his only offer.

Oregon is also recruiting his teammate QB Shane Dillon
http://oregon.scout.com/a.z?s=128&p=8&c=1&nid=3986007

Dillon currently holds offers from Ohio State and Cincy.

QB Dillon makes Dixon look buff... That is one skinny dude at 6'5/185!

woundedknees wrote:QB Dillon makes Dixon look buff... That is one skinny dude at 6'5/185!

Offers from Ohio State? Do they want him at QB?

Sauls is a 3* on Rivals so he's not as much of a sleeper as on Scout. The coaches must see some potential in him that the recruiting services don't, which is typically the case with a lot of recruits.

With Wilson and Cassell already on board I wonder why we are going after Sauls. I mean Gibson AND Wallace are still in serious play. Coaches know what they're doing, but a little curious on this one.

UOducksTK1 wrote:With Wilson and Cassell already on board I wonder why we are going after Sauls. I mean Gibson AND Wallace are still in serious play. Coaches know what they're doing, but a little curious on this one.

He may be one that they look at as a project while the others have the opportunity to play right away.

greenyellow wrote:Sauls is a 3* on Rivals so he's not as much of a sleeper as on Scout. The coaches must see some potential in him that the recruiting services don't, which is typically the case with a lot of recruits.

Scout is the one that's asleep.

UOducksTK1 wrote:With Wilson and Cassell already on board I wonder why we are going after Sauls. I mean Gibson AND Wallace are still in serious play. Coaches know what they're doing, but a little curious on this one.

They kid has good size, is fast and had 144 tackles last year.. Sounds like a gamer to me. Josh Kaddu anyone?

hermistonduck wrote:

UOducksTK1 wrote:With Wilson and Cassell already on board I wonder why we are going after Sauls. I mean Gibson AND Wallace are still in serious play. Coaches know what they're doing, but a little curious on this one.

They kid has good size, is fast and had 144 tackles last year.. Sounds like a gamer to me. Josh Kaddu anyone?

Getting 144 tackles is good for anyone, especially in high school, so I don't he's a bad prospect at all for Oregon.

When it comes to LBs I almost get more excited about the rangy lower rated guys we get because they always seem to be great. Guys like Paysinger & Kaddu, both were 2*s. Even Matthews was a 3*. And Lokombo, Clay & those guys still weren't THAT highly rated. They were lower end of 4*s. I'm pretty excited about Wilson & Cassell, adding Wallace & any of the others would be amazing.

dthomas=ddixon wrote:When it comes to LBs I almost get more excited about the rangy lower rated guys we get because they always seem to be great. Guys like Paysinger & Kaddu, both were 2*s. Even Matthews was a 3*. And Lokombo, Clay & those guys still weren't THAT highly rated. They were lower end of 4*s. I'm pretty excited about Wilson & Cassell, adding Wallace & any of the others would be amazing.

FWIW, Bo Lo was a 4 star.
http://oregon.scout.com/a.z?s=128&p=8&c=1&nid=3580240
#10 MLB ****

karlhungis wrote:

dthomas=ddixon wrote:When it comes to LBs I almost get more excited about the rangy lower rated guys we get because they always seem to be great. Guys like Paysinger & Kaddu, both were 2*s. Even Matthews was a 3*. And Lokombo, Clay & those guys still weren't THAT highly rated. They were lower end of 4*s. I'm pretty excited about Wilson & Cassell, adding Wallace & any of the others would be amazing.

FWIW, Bo Lo was a 4 star.
http://oregon.scout.com/a.z?s=128&p=8&c=1&nid=3580240
#10 MLB ****

Thats what I said. And I use Rivals ratings btw.