Ducks Attack Message Board Forum

Because they always recruit better...oh wait, thats not how it works

Well, based on recruiting wouldn't it be Texas vs. Notre Dame every year?

I laughed when I saw your headline...damn good recruiters not so great on the field!

There is a poster over on 247 called "cfbmatrix" who released a chart that shows recruiting versus wins. Basically he gives each school's coach a score, sort of like a turnover ratio. Basically it's a way to tell what coaches get the most out of their players. His chart shows that Chip Kelly is a net +1, Lane Kiffin is a net -1, Tedford is something like a net -2. Maybe he can post it for us as I think it's a great tool.

Destroyer77 wrote:There is a poster over on 247 called "cfbmatrix" who released a chart that shows recruiting versus wins. Basically he gives each school's coach a score, sort of like a turnover ratio. Basically it's a way to tell what coaches get the most out of their players. His chart shows that Chip Kelly is a net +1, Lane Kiffin is a net -1, Tedford is something like a net -2. Maybe he can post it for us as I think it's a great tool.

I think it is absurd to post a score for Lame when he's been there 1 year with mostly PC players. I wouldn't mind seeing how he determines that though.

Destroyer77 wrote:There is a poster over on 247 called "cfbmatrix" who released a chart that shows recruiting versus wins. Basically he gives each school's coach a score, sort of like a turnover ratio. Basically it's a way to tell what coaches get the most out of their players. His chart shows that Chip Kelly is a net +1, Lane Kiffin is a net -1, Tedford is something like a net -2. Maybe he can post it for us as I think it's a great tool.

Should post that Chart for all the recruits to see..... IN BIG FONTS