Page 1 of 2

Byers to Clemson

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:04 am
by SteelTown43

Re: Byers to Clemson

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:06 am
by fpsduck
F*cking Clemson.

Re: Byers to Clemson

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:07 am
by dd10snoop28
ugh. Tough loss.

Now we really need Simmons/Heyward.

Re: Byers to Clemson

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:10 am
by SuperDuck
This sucks, but it doesn't really shock me too much. I had a feeling Clemson would swoop in at the last minute. We'll be alright.

Re: Byers to Clemson

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:11 am
by chapelhillduck
Please people...don't be like the USC boards here with the recommit

Re: Byers to Clemson

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:15 am
by karlhungis
Damn, he sounded pretty solid last week. Freakin Dabo, can't stand that guy.

Re: Byers to Clemson

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:18 am
by Sooth
not too surprising but still really stings. i think this guy could have had a real impact on the d-line.

Re: Byers to Clemson

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:25 am
by PDXShogun
Clemson = The nation's most consistent underachiever. Still, can't blame the kid too much for staying close to home.

Re: Byers to Clemson

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:32 am
by nehalem
I'm starting to think we should recruit sumo wrestlers for the DT position. Leverage, excellent footwork, agility, strength are all there. I dont know how fast they'd be, but the rest of the skill set seems like it would lend itself to being a good DT or DE. And salt is cheap.

Re: Byers to Clemson

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:50 am
by bellsduck
Chip Kelly will probably never attend an announcement again.

Re: Byers to Clemson

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:52 am
by briarduck
bellsduck wrote:Chip Kelly will probably never attend an announcement again.
Isn't that the truth...I thought thius guy was solid with us, CRAP!

Re: Byers to Clemson

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 10:50 am
by nehalem
So are we now in the market for a Bluto Blutarsky from Faber type of DT?

Re: Byers to Clemson

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 10:54 am
by pezsez1
I understand this is a big decision for these kids to make, but come on! This isn’t like the Black Mamba, who committed to USC several months ago and has had lots of time to really think things over. Byers held a press conference just a few days ago and committed himself to Oregon… and then he changed his mind? I’m sorry, but I’ll never be OK with that.
I understand Clemson was his dream school. But if he really wanted to go to Clemson, why did he commit to Oregon at all? Why not just wait until signing day and then commit to a school, without making one school falsely plan on having him?
How much longer are we going to keep using the word “committed” when describing recruits before LOI day?

Re: Byers to Clemson

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 10:56 am
by UofO8
Hahaha i will never understand Clemson. Always mediocre, yet pulls top recruits.

Re: Byers to Clemson

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 10:56 am
by uo2010
pezsez1 wrote:I understand this is a big decision for these kids to make, but come on! This isn’t like the Black Mamba, who committed to USC several months ago and has had lots of time to really think things over. Byers held a press conference just a few days ago and committed himself to Oregon… and then he changed his mind? I’m sorry, but I’ll never be OK with that.
I understand Clemson was his dream school. But if he really wanted to go to Clemson, why did he commit to Oregon at all? Why not just wait until signing day and then commit to a school, without making one school falsely plan on having him?
How much longer are we going to keep using the word “committed” when describing recruits before LOI day?
He wanted to reserve a spot in this class in case things filled up and he didnt get an offer from Clemson. I would have done the same thing.