I think you guys are pretty far off. Most drafts only have 1 or 2 top players who are teens and have potential to explode. This class, top 3 picks should all be teens. I think it's a fuckin sweet class.
Pick 8 could be just as good as pick 1 or 2 and no one would be surprised at all....but it will also take 3-5 years to know because this class is so young
lukeyrid13 wrote:100% a boom or bust draft across the board
Pick 8 could be just as good as pick 1 or 2 and no one would be surprised at all....but it will also take 3-5 years to know because this class is so young
Al Harrington looked dead after his first TC and now I’m optimistic he’ll be huge for us. Patience pays
Sorry been busy. But I agree with everyone’s statements.
I think in season 2009, we will look at this as one of the most crucial drafts for rebuilding teams. Like Ownage said it’s more real. I feel we should have more of these kinds of drafts. But after 2003, we will have so much talent coming in. Tried to give us 5 great drafts, 5 not so great drafts and etc etc
jibbajabba614 wrote:Sorry been busy. But I agree with everyone’s statements.
I think in season 2009, we will look at this as one of the most crucial drafts for rebuilding teams. Like Ownage said it’s more real. I feel we should have more of these kinds of drafts. But after 2003, we will have so much talent coming in. Tried to give us 5 great drafts, 5 not so great drafts and etc etc
JB wrote:I think you guys are pretty far off. Most drafts only have 1 or 2 top players who are teens and have potential to explode. This class, top 3 picks should all be teens. I think it's a fuckin sweet class.
I mean if you subscribe to the theory that teenagers are all going to explode then sure, but starting off so raw leads to a lot of room for variability.
jibbajabba614 wrote:Sorry been busy. But I agree with everyone’s statements.
I think in season 2009, we will look at this as one of the most crucial drafts for rebuilding teams. Like Ownage said it’s more real. I feel we should have more of these kinds of drafts. But after 2003, we will have so much talent coming in. Tried to give us 5 great drafts, 5 not so great drafts and etc etc
As of 2003 or after 2003?
If I remember correctly, in 1.0 the talent level after 2003 exploded.
JB wrote:I think you guys are pretty far off. Most drafts only have 1 or 2 top players who are teens and have potential to explode. This class, top 3 picks should all be teens. I think it's a fuckin sweet class.
I mean if you subscribe to the theory that teenagers are all going to explode then sure, but starting off so raw leads to a lot of room for variability.
It’s like 20% pot boost, 60% stay the same or barely move, 20% pot death. But even staying the same pot for a TC is a huge advantage if guys are comparable