Stanford @ Washington

Post by **UOducksTK1** » Tue Sep 25, 2012 1:04 pm

I think this will be a close game. Stanford on top though.

Greenblood · Post by **Greenblood** » Tue Sep 25, 2012 3:18 pm

With the shape the Huskies' OL is in, I think it will take a pretty inspirational effort from UW to keep it close or win.

RanDux · Post by **RanDux** » Tue Sep 25, 2012 6:40 pm

Greenblood wrote:With the shape the Huskies' OL is in, I think it will take a pretty inspirational effort from UW to keep it close or win.

What's going on with UW's OL?

Greenblood · Post by **Greenblood** » Tue Sep 25, 2012 7:37 pm

RanDux wrote:
Greenblood wrote:With the shape the Huskies' OL is in, I think it will take a pretty inspirational effort from UW to keep it close or win.
What's going on with UW's OL?

Injuries: http://seattletimes.com/html/huskyfootb ... all25.html

Kimber45 · Post by **Kimber45** » Tue Sep 25, 2012 8:45 pm

Watched the Stanford/USC game on DVR and was surprised/impressed with the Cardinal players' moxy on the field. Tree players were all full of piss and vinegar taking no duff from the Trojans.

Beat them straight up for the fourth time consecutively. Pretty impressive.

Stanford by two scores over the Huskies. If J. Nunes can develop quickly, might be serious contender in the North.

DAT#6 · Post by **DAT#6** » Wed Sep 26, 2012 1:50 am

UOducksTK1 wrote:I think this will be a close game. Stanford on top though.

I do too. Stanford 37 UW 28

Elduderino · Post by **Elduderino** » Wed Sep 26, 2012 6:45 am

Kimber45 wrote:Watched the Stanford/USC game on DVR and was surprised/impressed with the Cardinal players' moxy on the field. Tree players were all full of piss and vinegar taking no duff from the Trojans.

Beat them straight up for the fourth time consecutively. Pretty impressive.

Stanford by two scores over the Huskies. If J. Nunes can develop quickly, might be serious contender in the North.

Don't disagree with most of your post, and I like them in this contest.

I just can't shake the image of touted Stanford defenses being torched by offenses that are able to get their defenders out in space. It's a game of matchups, and I don't know that Stanford can match elite spread teams.

DAT#6 · Post by **DAT#6** » Wed Sep 26, 2012 10:35 am

Elduderino wrote:
Kimber45 wrote:Watched the Stanford/USC game on DVR and was surprised/impressed with the Cardinal players' moxy on the field. Tree players were all full of piss and vinegar taking no duff from the Trojans.

Beat them straight up for the fourth time consecutively. Pretty impressive.

Stanford by two scores over the Huskies. If J. Nunes can develop quickly, might be serious contender in the North.
Don't disagree with most of your post, and I like them in this contest.

I just can't shake the image of touted Stanford defenses being torched by offenses that are able to get their defenders out in space. It's a game of matchups, and I don't know that Stanford can match elite spread teams.

Not that Stanford's opponent this week has anything to do with elite.

Post by **Bud Lee** » Thu Sep 27, 2012 6:18 am

The huskies never came close to scoring on us after the first field goal after we fumbled on the opening kick. It is hard for me to imagine them staying close with a Stanford team that beat USC…maybe though.

lukeyrid13 · Post by **lukeyrid13** » Thu Sep 27, 2012 9:06 am

31-14 Stanford

rockthief · Post by **rockthief** » Thu Sep 27, 2012 4:09 pm

31-13 Stanford. Washington will be bruised after this game.

duckfan96 · Post by **duckfan96** » Thu Sep 27, 2012 4:17 pm

35 to 3 stanford

Post by **UOducksTK1** » Thu Sep 27, 2012 4:19 pm

#9 Stanford 27 @ Washington 23

karlhungis · Post by **karlhungis** » Thu Sep 27, 2012 5:24 pm

I think the mutts pull off the upset.

lukeyrid13 · Post by **lukeyrid13** » Thu Sep 27, 2012 6:30 pm

Am I only one surprised that they only sold 50k seats against a top ten team?

Stanford @ Washington

Stanford @ Washington

Re: Stanford @ Washington

Re: Stanford @ Washington

Re: Stanford @ Washington

Re: Stanford @ Washington

Re: Stanford @ Washington

Re: Stanford @ Washington

Re: Stanford @ Washington

Re: Stanford @ Washington

Re: Stanford @ Washington

Re: Stanford @ Washington

Re: Stanford @ Washington

Re: Stanford @ Washington

Re: Stanford @ Washington

Re: Stanford @ Washington