Warriors/Kings
Moderators: UOducksTK1, Zyme, lukeyrid13, Oregon Ownage
- Oregon Ownage
- All-American
- Posts: 15300
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:40 am
- GM: Dallas Mavericks
- Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia
Warriors/Kings
Kings send:
Mutombo
Kings 01 first
Kings 02 first
Warriors send:
Nada
Mutombo
Kings 01 first
Kings 02 first
Warriors send:
Nada
- Oregon Ownage
- All-American
- Posts: 15300
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:40 am
- GM: Dallas Mavericks
- Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia
Re: Warriors/Kings
Kings accepted via PM
JB wrote: I'll keep working phones and if you go to sim and I have no deal done, just post
- Craig
- Senior
- Posts: 2418
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:16 pm
- GM: Phoenix Suns GM
- pistolpetejr
- Senior
- Posts: 2965
- Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2014 2:48 pm
- GM: Los Angeles Clippers
- Boom
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5676
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:32 pm
- GM: Houston Rockets
Re: Warriors/Kings
Takes Warriors out of the FA hunt.
-
- Three Star Recruit
- Posts: 392
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2022 6:49 pm
Re: Warriors/Kings
Agree
In my other leagues we have always been allowed to sign into hardcap territory as long as we dealt with it after the fact, and before sim 1.
So I found out I couldn't send Marbury an offer like 3 hours ago when I got home from work. Really didn't have much of a choice
And if he leaves I just die probably. Prob would just sell my guys off and give up on this team, let the Warriors have top picks
In my other leagues we have always been allowed to sign into hardcap territory as long as we dealt with it after the fact, and before sim 1.
So I found out I couldn't send Marbury an offer like 3 hours ago when I got home from work. Really didn't have much of a choice
And if he leaves I just die probably. Prob would just sell my guys off and give up on this team, let the Warriors have top picks
Kings
-
- Senior
- Posts: 3550
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:40 am
- GM: Utah Jazz
Re: Warriors/Kings
Another team bailed out
- dd10snoop28
- Senior
- Posts: 4819
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:06 am
- GM: New Jersey Nets GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
Re: Warriors/Kings
HOLD THE LINE!bellsduck wrote:Another team bailed out
- Oregon Ownage
- All-American
- Posts: 15300
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:40 am
- GM: Dallas Mavericks
- Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia
Re: Warriors/Kings
Wouldnt say this is bailing a team outbellsduck wrote:Another team bailed out
-
- Senior
- Posts: 3550
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:40 am
- GM: Utah Jazz
Re: Warriors/Kings
In the sense that he took on big contracts and Marbury knowing he couldn't afford them all, it most certainly is In a vacuum the deal is fine, but it allows him to put a max bid on a player most teams in the league wants with basically no punishment except losing two sh!t picks.Oregon Ownage wrote:Wouldnt say this is bailing a team outbellsduck wrote:Another team bailed out
I think if the Warriors bid on and got Marbury they could've gotten much more than what this trade gave them, but obviously no guarantee of that.
- Craig
- Senior
- Posts: 2418
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:16 pm
- GM: Phoenix Suns GM
Re: Warriors/Kings
Kings definitely paid a price. And for Ws its a risk/reward proposition. Sure he coulda sold Marbury for more but the likelikhood of getting Marbury was quite low. This is just a safer bet for a smaller reward. Higher risk/higher reward approach is a viable path but the safer one isnt crazy.
SUNS GM
-
- Three Star Recruit
- Posts: 392
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2022 6:49 pm
Re: Warriors/Kings
I got Marbury for a late first. When I got him, I had no idea what he was. Plans changed. And I am new. I didn't know the rules were strict about not ever being allowed to go over the HC. As I said, in my other leagues that is allowed as long as you get under by sim 1.bellsduck wrote:In the sense that he took on big contracts and Marbury knowing he couldn't afford them all, it most certainly is In a vacuum the deal is fine, but it allows him to put a max bid on a player most teams in the league wants with basically no punishment except losing two sh!t picks.Oregon Ownage wrote:Wouldnt say this is bailing a team outbellsduck wrote:Another team bailed out
I think if the Warriors bid on and got Marbury they could've gotten much more than what this trade gave them, but obviously no guarantee of that.
Kings
- dd10snoop28
- Senior
- Posts: 4819
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:06 am
- GM: New Jersey Nets GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
Re: Warriors/Kings
The rules should be like that tbh. it just happens that there was a conspiracy agains the nets for going 60k over the hard cap that tried to see them punished (in violation of the rules), which then led to an unnecessary rule change.JB wrote:I got Marbury for a late first. When I got him, I had no idea what he was. Plans changed. And I am new. I didn't know the rules were strict about not ever being allowed to go over the HC. As I said, in my other leagues that is allowed as long as you get under by sim 1.bellsduck wrote:In the sense that he took on big contracts and Marbury knowing he couldn't afford them all, it most certainly is In a vacuum the deal is fine, but it allows him to put a max bid on a player most teams in the league wants with basically no punishment except losing two sh!t picks.Oregon Ownage wrote:Wouldnt say this is bailing a team outbellsduck wrote:Another team bailed out
I think if the Warriors bid on and got Marbury they could've gotten much more than what this trade gave them, but obviously no guarantee of that.
it was a conspiracy of bureaucracy!
See history here:
https://ducksattack.com/forum/viewtopic ... ts#p505099
-
- Three Star Recruit
- Posts: 392
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2022 6:49 pm
Re: Warriors/Kings
It's always something nefarious with you guys.dd10snoop28 wrote:The rules should be like that tbh. it just happens that there was a conspiracy agains the nets for going 60k over the hard cap that tried to see them punished (in violation of the rules), which then led to an unnecessary rule change.JB wrote:I got Marbury for a late first. When I got him, I had no idea what he was. Plans changed. And I am new. I didn't know the rules were strict about not ever being allowed to go over the HC. As I said, in my other leagues that is allowed as long as you get under by sim 1.bellsduck wrote:In the sense that he took on big contracts and Marbury knowing he couldn't afford them all, it most certainly is In a vacuum the deal is fine, but it allows him to put a max bid on a player most teams in the league wants with basically no punishment except losing two sh!t picks.Oregon Ownage wrote:Wouldnt say this is bailing a team outbellsduck wrote:Another team bailed out
I think if the Warriors bid on and got Marbury they could've gotten much more than what this trade gave them, but obviously no guarantee of that.
it was a conspiracy of bureaucracy!
See history here:
https://ducksattack.com/forum/viewtopic ... ts#p505099
Kings
- lukeyrid13
- All-American
- Posts: 10484
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
- GM: Portland TrailBlazers
Re: Warriors/Kings
JB wrote:It's always something nefarious with you guys.dd10snoop28 wrote:The rules should be like that tbh. it just happens that there was a conspiracy agains the nets for going 60k over the hard cap that tried to see them punished (in violation of the rules), which then led to an unnecessary rule change.JB wrote:I got Marbury for a late first. When I got him, I had no idea what he was. Plans changed. And I am new. I didn't know the rules were strict about not ever being allowed to go over the HC. As I said, in my other leagues that is allowed as long as you get under by sim 1.bellsduck wrote:In the sense that he took on big contracts and Marbury knowing he couldn't afford them all, it most certainly is In a vacuum the deal is fine, but it allows him to put a max bid on a player most teams in the league wants with basically no punishment except losing two sh!t picks.Oregon Ownage wrote:Wouldnt say this is bailing a team outbellsduck wrote:Another team bailed out
I think if the Warriors bid on and got Marbury they could've gotten much more than what this trade gave them, but obviously no guarantee of that.
it was a conspiracy of bureaucracy!
See history here:
https://ducksattack.com/forum/viewtopic ... ts#p505099
Shockingly, I think the Nets rated dead last in the nefarious rankings. Not sure how that happened