Ducks Attack Message Board Forum

Kings send:
Mutombo
Kings 01 first
Kings 02 first

Warriors send:
Nada

Kings accepted via PM

JB wrote: I'll keep working phones and if you go to sim and I have no deal done, just post

The extortion! What if Marbury leaves?!

WOW. Steal for GS honestly.

Takes Warriors out of the FA hunt.

Agree

In my other leagues we have always been allowed to sign into hardcap territory as long as we dealt with it after the fact, and before sim 1.

So I found out I couldn't send Marbury an offer like 3 hours ago when I got home from work. Really didn't have much of a choice

And if he leaves I just die probably. Prob would just sell my guys off and give up on this team, let the Warriors have top picks

Another team bailed out

bellsduck wrote:Another team bailed out

HOLD THE LINE!

bellsduck wrote:Another team bailed out

Wouldnt say this is bailing a team out

Oregon Ownage wrote:

bellsduck wrote:Another team bailed out

Wouldnt say this is bailing a team out

In the sense that he took on big contracts and Marbury knowing he couldn't afford them all, it most certainly is In a vacuum the deal is fine, but it allows him to put a max bid on a player most teams in the league wants with basically no punishment except losing two sh!t picks.
I think if the Warriors bid on and got Marbury they could've gotten much more than what this trade gave them, but obviously no guarantee of that.

Kings definitely paid a price. And for Ws its a risk/reward proposition. Sure he coulda sold Marbury for more but the likelikhood of getting Marbury was quite low. This is just a safer bet for a smaller reward. Higher risk/higher reward approach is a viable path but the safer one isnt crazy.

bellsduck wrote:

Oregon Ownage wrote:

bellsduck wrote:Another team bailed out

Wouldnt say this is bailing a team out

In the sense that he took on big contracts and Marbury knowing he couldn't afford them all, it most certainly is In a vacuum the deal is fine, but it allows him to put a max bid on a player most teams in the league wants with basically no punishment except losing two sh!t picks.
I think if the Warriors bid on and got Marbury they could've gotten much more than what this trade gave them, but obviously no guarantee of that.

I got Marbury for a late first. When I got him, I had no idea what he was. Plans changed. And I am new. I didn't know the rules were strict about not ever being allowed to go over the HC. As I said, in my other leagues that is allowed as long as you get under by sim 1.

JB wrote:

bellsduck wrote:

Oregon Ownage wrote:

bellsduck wrote:Another team bailed out

Wouldnt say this is bailing a team out

In the sense that he took on big contracts and Marbury knowing he couldn't afford them all, it most certainly is In a vacuum the deal is fine, but it allows him to put a max bid on a player most teams in the league wants with basically no punishment except losing two sh!t picks.
I think if the Warriors bid on and got Marbury they could've gotten much more than what this trade gave them, but obviously no guarantee of that.

I got Marbury for a late first. When I got him, I had no idea what he was. Plans changed. And I am new. I didn't know the rules were strict about not ever being allowed to go over the HC. As I said, in my other leagues that is allowed as long as you get under by sim 1.

The rules should be like that tbh. it just happens that there was a conspiracy agains the nets for going 60k over the hard cap that tried to see them punished (in violation of the rules), which then led to an unnecessary rule change.

it was a conspiracy of bureaucracy!

See history here:

https://ducksattack.com/forum/viewtopic ... ts#p505099

dd10snoop28 wrote:

JB wrote:

bellsduck wrote:

Oregon Ownage wrote:

bellsduck wrote:Another team bailed out

Wouldnt say this is bailing a team out

In the sense that he took on big contracts and Marbury knowing he couldn't afford them all, it most certainly is In a vacuum the deal is fine, but it allows him to put a max bid on a player most teams in the league wants with basically no punishment except losing two sh!t picks.
I think if the Warriors bid on and got Marbury they could've gotten much more than what this trade gave them, but obviously no guarantee of that.

I got Marbury for a late first. When I got him, I had no idea what he was. Plans changed. And I am new. I didn't know the rules were strict about not ever being allowed to go over the HC. As I said, in my other leagues that is allowed as long as you get under by sim 1.

The rules should be like that tbh. it just happens that there was a conspiracy agains the nets for going 60k over the hard cap that tried to see them punished (in violation of the rules), which then led to an unnecessary rule change.

it was a conspiracy of bureaucracy!

See history here:

https://ducksattack.com/forum/viewtopic ... ts#p505099

It's always something nefarious with you guys.

JB wrote:

dd10snoop28 wrote:

JB wrote:

bellsduck wrote:

Oregon Ownage wrote:

bellsduck wrote:Another team bailed out

Wouldnt say this is bailing a team out

In the sense that he took on big contracts and Marbury knowing he couldn't afford them all, it most certainly is In a vacuum the deal is fine, but it allows him to put a max bid on a player most teams in the league wants with basically no punishment except losing two sh!t picks.
I think if the Warriors bid on and got Marbury they could've gotten much more than what this trade gave them, but obviously no guarantee of that.

I got Marbury for a late first. When I got him, I had no idea what he was. Plans changed. And I am new. I didn't know the rules were strict about not ever being allowed to go over the HC. As I said, in my other leagues that is allowed as long as you get under by sim 1.

The rules should be like that tbh. it just happens that there was a conspiracy agains the nets for going 60k over the hard cap that tried to see them punished (in violation of the rules), which then led to an unnecessary rule change.

it was a conspiracy of bureaucracy!

See history here:

https://ducksattack.com/forum/viewtopic ... ts#p505099

It's always something nefarious with you guys.

Shockingly, I think the Nets rated dead last in the nefarious rankings. Not sure how that happened