Visitors for Stanford

Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1

gofightingducks
All Pac-12
Posts: 5533
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:08 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Post by gofightingducks »

greenyellow wrote:
DarronThomas1 wrote:Ivan Maisel posted on his twitter feed that he saw Sumler at the game decked out in duck gear. I don't think we have to worry about losing him anymore.
He's one player that I don't think we have to fear losing. He was also considering Stanford at one point, but he probably saw that he made the right move in choosing Oregon.

Yeah with DT for another 2 years after this season and BB waiting in the wings to get the ball to him for the Ducks and Luck going to the NFL so who knows how good Stanford is going to be without Luck and Harbaugh may not be around too much longer either and Chip staying for at least another 5 years and saying he wants to win it all. I am sure the Ducks will be getting some big commitments over the next few weeks as they continue to win and get more media attention and LMJ gets more and more Heisman hype and the Ducks continue to be in the NC conversation. Go get em' Chip!!!
User avatar
gregspechtismyhero
Freshman
Posts: 1470
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:16 pm
Location: Lake Oswego, OR

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Post by gregspechtismyhero »

When do the reactions usually come out?
In Helfrich, Frost, and Allioti we trust
Image (USA Today Sports)
AIM: hockeygoalie923
Lord_Vader
One Star Recruit
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 6:18 pm

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Post by Lord_Vader »

gregspechtismyhero wrote:When do the reactions usually come out?

Whenever someone decides to rip off one of the pay sites and post it here.
dthomas=ddixon
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 8809
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:42 pm
Location: McMinnville, Oregon

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Post by dthomas=ddixon »

Lord_Vader wrote:
gregspechtismyhero wrote:When do the reactions usually come out?

Whenever someone decides to rip off one of the pay sites and post it here.
Oooh, good one.
Image
User avatar
Supreme
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 925
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 2:04 pm
Location: Somewhere But Anywhere

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Post by Supreme »

Lamar Dawson and Mr. Avery need to jump on board.


I hope USCw sucking relinquishes their recruiting power.
Remember, remember, the Fifth of November, the Gunpowder Treason and Plot. I know of no reason why the Gunpowder Treason should ever be forgot... But what of the man? I know his name was Guy Fawkes and I know, in 1605, he attempted to blow up the Houses of Parliament. But who was he really? What was he like? We are told to remember the idea, not the man, because a man can fail. He can be caught, he can be killed and forgotten, but 400 years later, an idea can still change the world. I've witnessed first hand the power of ideas. I've seen people kill in the name of them, and die defending them. But you cannot kiss an idea; cannot touch it, or hold it. Ideas do not bleed, they do not feel pain, they do not love... And it is not an idea that I miss //////// Follow me one Tumblr/blog http://f***-kp.tumblr.com/
Lord_Vader
One Star Recruit
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 6:18 pm

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Post by Lord_Vader »

dthomas=ddixon wrote:
Lord_Vader wrote:
gregspechtismyhero wrote:When do the reactions usually come out?

Whenever someone decides to rip off one of the pay sites and post it here.
Oooh, good one.

Not trying to be clever or anything. No real news is broke here. Its a great board for talking about things but when someone comes on here and asks, "has anyone heard or know anything about such and such" they basically are asking, "has anyone paid a subscription to Rivals/Scout/ESPN and have they read anything they said about how things are going?"

C4Qs is awesome. Lots of activity and lots of views, but one thing that DOESNT happen here is reporting and thats fine, so DT dont get all huffy and puffy about me saying what this place actually is.

I subscribe to Scout and I think it's hilarious how people bitch about having to pay but then bitch when no one comes racing over to post all the goodies and such.
duckgrad99
All Pac-12
Posts: 6086
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:33 pm
Location: San Diego

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Post by duckgrad99 »

Lord_Vader wrote:
dthomas=ddixon wrote:
Lord_Vader wrote:
gregspechtismyhero wrote:When do the reactions usually come out?

Whenever someone decides to rip off one of the pay sites and post it here.
Oooh, good one.

Not trying to be clever or anything. No real news is broke here. Its a great board for talking about things but when someone comes on here and asks, "has anyone heard or know anything about such and such" they basically are asking, "has anyone paid a subscription to Rivals/Scout/ESPN and have they read anything they said about how things are going?"

C4Qs is awesome. Lots of activity and lots of views, but one thing that DOESNT happen here is reporting and thats fine, so DT dont get all huffy and puffy about me saying what this place actually is.

I subscribe to Scout and I think it's hilarious how people bitch about having to pay but then bitch when no one comes racing over to post all the goodies and such.


How much did Jhop pay you to say that? :lol:
Image
karlhungis
All Pac-12
Posts: 7990
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:08 am

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Post by karlhungis »

Yeah, it's funny how all of the guys that actually got us some recruiting info on their own have since been hired by pay sites.... Lord knows information shouldn't be free.
OregonFan4life -
My source just said Chip is officially back!
It will be announced at Autzen press conference tomorrow afternoon!
User avatar
Boom
All Pac-12
Posts: 5815
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:32 pm
GM: Houston Rockets

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Post by Boom »

karlhungis wrote:Yeah, it's funny how all of the guys that actually got us some recruiting info on their own have since been hired by pay sites.... Lord knows information shouldn't be free.
It's all free eventually........ but if your impatient then a subscription is the way to go
User avatar
Tray Dub
Senior
Posts: 4994
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:31 pm

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Post by Tray Dub »

karlhungis wrote:Yeah, it's funny how all of the guys that actually got us some recruiting info on their own have since been hired by pay sites.... Lord knows information shouldn't be free.
Especially not information as super duper important as recruiting.
JTinKC
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 402
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 11:20 am
Location: Overland Park,KS-New Orleans,LA

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Post by JTinKC »

Not trying to be clever or anything. No real news is broke here. Its a great board for talking about things but when someone comes on here and asks, "has anyone heard or know anything about such and such" they basically are asking, "has anyone paid a subscription to Rivals/Scout/ESPN and have they read anything they said about how things are going?"

C4Qs is awesome. Lots of activity and lots of views, but one thing that DOESNT happen here is reporting and thats fine, so DT dont get all huffy and puffy about me saying what this place actually is.

I subscribe to Scout and I think it's hilarious how people bitch about having to pay but then bitch when no one comes racing over to post all the goodies and such.
I don't think the difference in time between what is broke on the pay sites vs when it makes it here justifies (in my mind) me paying for one of the other sites. I've payed for both of DT and ED and I'm happy with this board. I think these guys have a great site here.
User avatar
ljginger
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 356
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:01 pm

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Post by ljginger »

I knew Tacoi Sumler was down to Oregon and Stanford...that's why I made that so called dumb comment...actually I just know my stuff!
User avatar
NCDucks09
Senior
Posts: 2265
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 10:37 am
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Post by NCDucks09 »

Subscribe for recruiting news if you like paying for rumors. It's a racket. Nothing is a lock until national LOI day. Even then their are admissions red tape that can screw things up.

Rumors are fun and entertaining, but we can think up our own here on our board without paying for some info site that is 01% logic and 99% BS.

I remember one of those Scout Analyst's saying when I subscribed my one and only time, "Boyd is a 99% lock for Oregon." It's an infamous quote. Guy was straight up trying to stir up the bee's nest. No thank you.
2012 Rose Bowl Champions
2013 Fiesta Bowl Champions

Still Dedicated to the Ducks Winning the Natty!
User avatar
Duck07
All-American
Posts: 17123
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
Location: Parts Unknown

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Post by Duck07 »

karlhungis wrote:Yeah, it's funny how all of the guys that actually got us some recruiting info on their own have since been hired by pay sites.... Lord knows information shouldn't be free.
I understand the relationship between the recruiting sites, but I am ardently opposed to keep information from people. I don't believe anybody "owns" information, it should be available to all. To me, these post-visit reports are all the same

Recruit: I had a "insert synonym for awesome" time visiting Eugene and the facilities were "i.s.f.a." The fans were "i.s.f.a." and I had a "i.s.f.a" time.

The only real news is when a guy committs, at which point we play the waiting game until signing day.
Image
jimmy12
Senior
Posts: 2823
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:38 am

Re: Visitors for Stanford

Post by jimmy12 »

Lock this thread-- it is officially worthless.
Post Reply