Projected commits

Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1

karlhungis
All Pac-12
Posts: 7990
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:08 am

Re: Projected commits

Post by karlhungis »

mdm0302 wrote:
UofO8 wrote:
buckmarkduck wrote:Lame? Having a TE that's what 6'4-6'5 and can run and jump like he does, he could be unstoppable in our offense. Besides that's what he wants to play, so lame is telling him "nope your playing D" and watching him sign with SC or OU.
Yes, lame. We got a 5* TE last recruiting class and still have Paulsen and Williams. Sorry, but DL and LB are going to be a little more bare than TE after this season.
but then after next year we will have one 5 star and tight end and what else. I do however want colt to play D, but then on the other side of that i think it is easier to just ball on offense and i think our D might have a lil bit to much of the mental aspect for him.
Is it really that complicated to be a DE on our team?
OregonFan4life -
My source just said Chip is officially back!
It will be announced at Autzen press conference tomorrow afternoon!
mdm0302
Freshman
Posts: 1349
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:38 pm
Location: Eugene O

Re: Projected commits

Post by mdm0302 »

karlhungis wrote:
mdm0302 wrote:
UofO8 wrote:
buckmarkduck wrote:Lame? Having a TE that's what 6'4-6'5 and can run and jump like he does, he could be unstoppable in our offense. Besides that's what he wants to play, so lame is telling him "nope your playing D" and watching him sign with SC or OU.
Yes, lame. We got a 5* TE last recruiting class and still have Paulsen and Williams. Sorry, but DL and LB are going to be a little more bare than TE after this season.
but then after next year we will have one 5 star and tight end and what else. I do however want colt to play D, but then on the other side of that i think it is easier to just ball on offense and i think our D might have a lil bit to much of the mental aspect for him.
Is it really that complicated to be a DE on our team?
lol alot more than any other CFB team
User avatar
thegreenstain
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 253
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:57 pm

Re: Projected commits

Post by thegreenstain »

Learning all the aspects of being a tight end in the Oregon offense is more taxing mentally than playing defensive end, as Dion Jordan can attest to.
Image
karlhungis
All Pac-12
Posts: 7990
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:08 am

Re: Projected commits

Post by karlhungis »

mdm0302 wrote:
karlhungis wrote:
mdm0302 wrote:
UofO8 wrote:
buckmarkduck wrote:Lame? Having a TE that's what 6'4-6'5 and can run and jump like he does, he could be unstoppable in our offense. Besides that's what he wants to play, so lame is telling him "nope your playing D" and watching him sign with SC or OU.
Yes, lame. We got a 5* TE last recruiting class and still have Paulsen and Williams. Sorry, but DL and LB are going to be a little more bare than TE after this season.
but then after next year we will have one 5 star and tight end and what else. I do however want colt to play D, but then on the other side of that i think it is easier to just ball on offense and i think our D might have a lil bit to much of the mental aspect for him.
Is it really that complicated to be a DE on our team?
lol alot more than any other CFB team
Care to substantiate that?
OregonFan4life -
My source just said Chip is officially back!
It will be announced at Autzen press conference tomorrow afternoon!
mdm0302
Freshman
Posts: 1349
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:38 pm
Location: Eugene O

Re: Projected commits

Post by mdm0302 »

thegreenstain wrote:Learning all the aspects of being a tight end in the Oregon offense is more taxing mentally than playing defensive end, as Dion Jordan can attest to.
that's a good point but i still think its debatable. Kenny Rowe also has a much larger responsibility than the other DE's on the team (much for than Jordan) since hes playing a hybrid DE/LB position, the same spot colt would play on D.
mdm0302
Freshman
Posts: 1349
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:38 pm
Location: Eugene O

Re: Projected commits

Post by mdm0302 »

karlhungis wrote:
mdm0302 wrote:
karlhungis wrote:
mdm0302 wrote:
UofO8 wrote:
buckmarkduck wrote:Lame? Having a TE that's what 6'4-6'5 and can run and jump like he does, he could be unstoppable in our offense. Besides that's what he wants to play, so lame is telling him "nope your playing D" and watching him sign with SC or OU.
Yes, lame. We got a 5* TE last recruiting class and still have Paulsen and Williams. Sorry, but DL and LB are going to be a little more bare than TE after this season.
but then after next year we will have one 5 star and tight end and what else. I do however want colt to play D, but then on the other side of that i think it is easier to just ball on offense and i think our D might have a lil bit to much of the mental aspect for him.
Is it really that complicated to be a DE on our team?
lol alot more than any other CFB team
Care to substantiate that?
Colt would play the same spot that kenny rowe does if he came here. The hybrid DE/LB spot. that takes more mentally, IMO, than playing just DE or just LB. The person who plays that spot has to know everything a D-lineman knows plus coverage plays
karlhungis
All Pac-12
Posts: 7990
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:08 am

Re: Projected commits

Post by karlhungis »

mdm0302 wrote:
karlhungis wrote:
mdm0302 wrote:
karlhungis wrote:
mdm0302 wrote:
UofO8 wrote: Yes, lame. We got a 5* TE last recruiting class and still have Paulsen and Williams. Sorry, but DL and LB are going to be a little more bare than TE after this season.
but then after next year we will have one 5 star and tight end and what else. I do however want colt to play D, but then on the other side of that i think it is easier to just ball on offense and i think our D might have a lil bit to much of the mental aspect for him.
Is it really that complicated to be a DE on our team?
lol alot more than any other CFB team
Care to substantiate that?
Colt would play the same spot that kenny rowe does if he came here. The hybrid DE/LB spot. that takes more mentally, IMO, than playing just DE or just LB. The person who plays that spot has to know everything a D-lineman knows plus coverage plays
If he can't mentally handle the Rowe role, why wouldn't they just make him a standard DE?
OregonFan4life -
My source just said Chip is officially back!
It will be announced at Autzen press conference tomorrow afternoon!
mdm0302
Freshman
Posts: 1349
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:38 pm
Location: Eugene O

Re: Projected commits

Post by mdm0302 »

they definitely could and i think he would be a badass Standard DE. i think that lyerla is much like cliff in terms of how coach-able he is. Sometimes those players work out, certainly in cliffs case it is. I think players in our system have to be fairly coach-able to play any position on D, (obviously some more than others) but i think that the TE position in any system is a more instinctive position to play and that he might have a better chance to excel there, although like i said before i would rather him play D because he could be a defensive weapon (just like cliff) and we will always have multiple weapons on offense.
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39356
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Projected commits

Post by greenyellow »

mdm0302 wrote:they definitely could and i think he would be a badass Standard DE. i think that lyerla is much like cliff in terms of how coach-able he is. Sometimes those players work out, certainly in cliffs case it is. I think players in our system have to be fairly coach-able to play any position on D, (obviously some more than others) but i think that the TE position in any system is a more instinctive position to play and that he might have a better chance to excel there, although like i said before i would rather him play D because he could be a defensive weapon (just like cliff) and we will always have multiple weapons on offense.
I would also favor Lyerla playing on D since we've got enough offensive weapons; we need more on defense.
Image
User avatar
PDXShogun
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 583
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 10:18 am
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Projected commits

Post by PDXShogun »

Where Lyerla ends up playing (IF he ends up at Oregon, still no sure thing) will probably depend on two things: 1) who else we recruit. If we end up with Jason Gibson he'll likely be slotted for that Kenny Rowe role. He's a little undersized but the scouting reports I've read indicate that he's better with his hand on the ground than standing up. That would push Lyerla to TE and considering we only have 1 scholarship player there two seasons from now, this is a need that no one is talking about. And 2) where he wants to play. Don't underestimate this; 5* recruits tend to have a say in these things.
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39356
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Projected commits

Post by greenyellow »

PDXShogun wrote:Where Lyerla ends up playing (IF he ends up at Oregon, still no sure thing) will probably depend on two things: 1) who else we recruit. If we end up with Jason Gibson he'll likely be slotted for that Kenny Rowe role. He's a little undersized but the scouting reports I've read indicate that he's better with his hand on the ground than standing up. That would push Lyerla to TE and considering we only have 1 scholarship player there two seasons from now, this is a need that no one is talking about. And 2) where he wants to play. Don't underestimate this; 5* recruits tend to have a say in these things.
I would also bet that Chip and the coaches already know where they would put a player like Lyerla. They wouldn't recruit him if they didn't have an idea of where he's going to play.
Image
Post Reply