Class ranking up to 7th on Rivals
Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1
- bigsugarduck
- Five Star Recruit
- Posts: 1209
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:52 pm
Class ranking up to 7th on Rivals
Hot diggity....
Do we have a top 5 class in the works?
http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/r ... 11/all/all
Do we have a top 5 class in the works?
http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/r ... 11/all/all
Stewart Mandel-"From a purely aesthetic standpoint, I much prefer to watch a good spread-rushing offense over a traditional Power-I offense, and Oregon's has been the most fun by far for the past several years. It's fast, its precise, and when Chip Kelly has the right quarterback (Dixon, Masoli) at the helm, the possibility of someone ripping off a 60-yard run exists on nearly every play."
- Duck07
- All-American
- Posts: 17123
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
- Location: Parts Unknown
Re: Class ranking up to 7th on Rivals
Well, if you go by star rating we're 7th also so closing on Colt and some of these DL will only make it higher.

- UOducksTK1
- Site Admin

- Posts: 40708
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
- GM: Boston Celtics GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
Re: Class ranking up to 7th on Rivals
Only 2 teams have more four stars than us, sick.

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
-
RanDux
- Senior
- Posts: 2840
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:19 pm
- Location: Happy Valley, OR
Re: Class ranking up to 7th on Rivals
13th in star ranking with Scout, with a higher star average than U$C and Stanford.
- greenyellow
- Moderator

- Posts: 39356
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
- Location: Eugene, OR
Re: Class ranking up to 7th on Rivals
Not bad for them not having a couple of our recruits on the board or rated.RanDux wrote:13th in star ranking with Scout, with a higher star average than U$C and Stanford.

- Boom
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5815
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:32 pm
- GM: Houston Rockets
Re: Class ranking up to 7th on Rivals
pretty incredible considering we only have 2 instate kids on our roster....
-
gofightingducks
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5533
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:08 pm
- Location: Portland, OR
Re: Class ranking up to 7th on Rivals
and 5 ESPNU150 commits which is 1 more than last years class which was the best ever and still a few 150 recruits on the board!
- UOducksTK1
- Site Admin

- Posts: 40708
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
- GM: Boston Celtics GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
Re: Class ranking up to 7th on Rivals
16 on scout too. And I'm sure we still land 2-3 more four star guys, so probably like 10-12 on scout and 4-6 on rivals.

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
-
Bigducker
- Freshman
- Posts: 1391
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:51 pm
Re: Class ranking up to 7th on Rivals
Scout doesn't count.UOducksTK1 wrote:16 on scout too. And I'm sure we still land 2-3 more four star guys, so probably like 10-12 on scout and 4-6 on rivals.
- UOducksTK1
- Site Admin

- Posts: 40708
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
- GM: Boston Celtics GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
Re: Class ranking up to 7th on Rivals
Haha, how about we divide the ranking they give us by 2 and add a 1.Bigducker wrote:Scout doesn't count.UOducksTK1 wrote:16 on scout too. And I'm sure we still land 2-3 more four star guys, so probably like 10-12 on scout and 4-6 on rivals.
So 12 on scout is actually a 12/2 + 1 = 7!

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
-
Bigducker
- Freshman
- Posts: 1391
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:51 pm
Re: Class ranking up to 7th on Rivals
They'd probably be more accurate by doing that.UOducksTK1 wrote:Haha, how about we divide the ranking they give us by 2 and add a 1.Bigducker wrote:Scout doesn't count.UOducksTK1 wrote:16 on scout too. And I'm sure we still land 2-3 more four star guys, so probably like 10-12 on scout and 4-6 on rivals.
So 12 on scout is actually a 12/2 + 1 = 7!
-
GoDucksIn09
- Senior
- Posts: 3086
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:15 am
Re: Class ranking up to 7th on Rivals
Just a curious thought on the rankings. I do not know that it matters per se but is curious that we are 7th on rivals... probably the top Pac 10 school... but yet on scout and ESPNU we are like 16th or 21st and behind USC and Cal or Stanford.. Just curious how they can have us behind them and yet rivals doesnt.
- PDXShogun
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 583
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 10:18 am
- Location: Portland, OR
Re: Class ranking up to 7th on Rivals
The ranking formulas each site uses is a little different. Scout and ESPN simply give x amount to a 3* and x amount to a 4*, and so fourth. Then calculate the totals up. This tends to reward quantity over quality a little more. Rivals uses more of a weighted system that takes class size into account. This is why they're largely regarded as the most accurate.GoDucksIn09 wrote:Just a curious thought on the rankings. I do not know that it matters per se but is curious that we are 7th on rivals... probably the top Pac 10 school... but yet on scout and ESPNU we are like 16th or 21st and behind USC and Cal or Stanford.. Just curious how they can have us behind them and yet rivals doesnt.
- Boom
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5815
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:32 pm
- GM: Houston Rockets
Re: Class ranking up to 7th on Rivals
ESPN hasn't updated their team ranking in about a month
- UofO8
- Senior
- Posts: 2538
- Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 3:41 pm
Re: Class ranking up to 7th on Rivals
Yeah, i was quite perplexed when i looked after we landed Blackmon and were still 20 even though we had as many ESPN 150 players as most of the people in the top 10 and even some in the top 5.Boom wrote:ESPN hasn't updated their team ranking in about a month
