MFRDuckFan wrote:Frost is VERY effective for me.........oh.......sorry.........didn't mean to let that slip!woundedknees wrote:Good to know... Frost seems to be pretty effective.![]()
Very nice MFR.
Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1
MFRDuckFan wrote:Frost is VERY effective for me.........oh.......sorry.........didn't mean to let that slip!woundedknees wrote:Good to know... Frost seems to be pretty effective.![]()
is that "nope" affirmative or negative?hines wrote:nope.ppilot wrote:I think this is a sign that the staff aren't counting on Lee or Kelly
I was raised by wolves, what can I say!!wlduck wrote:MFRDuckFan wrote:Frost is VERY effective for me.........oh.......sorry.........didn't mean to let that slip!woundedknees wrote:Good to know... Frost seems to be pretty effective.![]()
Very nice MFR.




I think nope as in if we get BJ, he believes Caesar is still in play.vagusnerve wrote:is that "nope" affirmative or negative?hines wrote:nope.ppilot wrote:I think this is a sign that the staff aren't counting on Lee or Kelly
Do we really need another WR in this class if it's not someone like Lee?
Dude, just save the remaining spots for the DLine and major talent.... if we have a couple left over more for next year.


I think that may be it. The coaches may want to get another couple WRs in this class if they can just so they have some players they could possibly redshirt. The freshman class, as of now, next year will have Dungy, Lowe, Sumler, and Blackmon so I could see them possibly getting some more WRs that they hope to develop and use in the future.UOducksTK1 wrote:I think nope as in if we get BJ, he believes Caesar is still in play.vagusnerve wrote:is that "nope" affirmative or negative?hines wrote:nope.ppilot wrote:I think this is a sign that the staff aren't counting on Lee or Kelly
Do we really need another WR in this class if it's not someone like Lee?
Dude, just save the remaining spots for the DLine and major talent.... if we have a couple left over more for next year.

For sure, but this isn't in a vacuum... we've got a really small class next year if we fully book this one. really small. And by all accounts next year's recruiting will be better than this years.... sooooooo.......ncduck wrote:Is it overkill? We have like three on the field all the time, that means we need six on the two deep and another handful backing it up on the scout team.
Also, it's really tough to know what the coaches have planned for each player.
This is what I don't understand. Why the rush to fill this year's class to the max, if the experts say that next year and the year after is when we strike gold.vagusnerve wrote:For sure, but this isn't in a vacuum... we've got a really small class next year if we fully book this one. really small. And by all accounts next year's recruiting will be better than this years.... sooooooo.......ncduck wrote:Is it overkill? We have like three on the field all the time, that means we need six on the two deep and another handful backing it up on the scout team.
Also, it's really tough to know what the coaches have planned for each player.
It is hard to say what the coaches might know. Perhaps they are aware that 10 players are planning on transferring out of the program. If something like that were happening, they would want to fill this class up.bellsduck wrote:This is what I don't understand. Why the rush to fill this year's class to the max, if the experts say that next year and the year after is when we strike gold.vagusnerve wrote:For sure, but this isn't in a vacuum... we've got a really small class next year if we fully book this one. really small. And by all accounts next year's recruiting will be better than this years.... sooooooo.......ncduck wrote:Is it overkill? We have like three on the field all the time, that means we need six on the two deep and another handful backing it up on the scout team.
Also, it's really tough to know what the coaches have planned for each player.
When was the staff ever that serious about Flowers & Denham? Flowers isn't coveted by very many schools and right now he may be down to only Michigan. Sure he had an offer, but they canceled his trip and haven't shown much interest since. As for Denham, it's very dubious if he ever had an unconditional offer from us. Once we secured the 1 JC we truly wanted in Vaughn they likely told Denham adios. The fact that they're still looking at Cesar & Kelley tells me that Flowers & Denham are both serious back up plans and have been so for a long time.uostudent wrote:Kelley is visiting this weekend. Lee is probably headed to USC though.ppilot wrote:I think this is a sign that the staff aren't counting on Lee or Kelly
What's odd is that the coaching staff flat out dropped Hakeem Flowers and Anthony Denham.
Caesar would be a nice addition. Hopefully they can get him out here for a visit.
vagusnerve wrote:For sure, but this isn't in a vacuum... we've got a really small class next year if we fully book this one. really small. And by all accounts next year's recruiting will be better than this years.... sooooooo.......ncduck wrote:Is it overkill? We have like three on the field all the time, that means we need six on the two deep and another handful backing it up on the scout team.
Also, it's really tough to know what the coaches have planned for each player.
I don't think that's a practice any school wants to be known for.sx1080 wrote:vagusnerve wrote:For sure, but this isn't in a vacuum... we've got a really small class next year if we fully book this one. really small. And by all accounts next year's recruiting will be better than this years.... sooooooo.......ncduck wrote:Is it overkill? We have like three on the field all the time, that means we need six on the two deep and another handful backing it up on the scout team.
Also, it's really tough to know what the coaches have planned for each player.
scollies are for one yr only. a player can be dropped at the end of each school yr.