Munchie Legaux or Bust!

vagusnerve · Post by **vagusnerve** » Tue Jan 18, 2011 7:24 pm

Guys, we need to get Munchie Legaux!

If the coaches can't close him I don't know what I'm going to do...

I wonder how long Kelly will last at Oregon if Munchie goes to another school?

buckmarkduck · Post by **buckmarkduck** » Tue Jan 18, 2011 7:28 pm

vagusnerve · Post by **vagusnerve** » Tue Jan 18, 2011 7:30 pm

buckmarkduck wrote:ok?

If we don't get him it just shows Kelly isn't much of a recruiter and can't capitalize on the Natty

ducksrock · Post by **ducksrock** » Tue Jan 18, 2011 7:31 pm

vagusnerve wrote:
buckmarkduck wrote:ok?
If we don't get him it just shows Kelly isn't much of a recruiter and can't capitalize on the Natty

And we NEED him, why?

buckmarkduck · Post by **buckmarkduck** » Tue Jan 18, 2011 7:37 pm

I'm guessing your being sarcastic, but is he transferring or something? Wasn't he a 2010 recruit and like the 77 rated QB? Personally I think the 4 QB's (DT, Bennett, Mariota and Randall) we have are all better than Munchie.

vagusnerve · Post by **vagusnerve** » Tue Jan 18, 2011 7:37 pm

ducksrock wrote:
vagusnerve wrote:
buckmarkduck wrote:ok?
If we don't get him it just shows Kelly isn't much of a recruiter and can't capitalize on the Natty

And we NEED him, why?

Wow, talk about dense!

woundedknees · Post by **woundedknees** » Tue Jan 18, 2011 7:45 pm

Munch N Go used to be my quick stop market of choice...

ducksrock · Post by **ducksrock** » Tue Jan 18, 2011 8:26 pm

vagusnerve wrote:
ducksrock wrote:
vagusnerve wrote:
buckmarkduck wrote:ok?
If we don't get him it just shows Kelly isn't much of a recruiter and can't capitalize on the Natty

And we NEED him, why?

Wow, talk about dense!

pdxduck · Post by **pdxduck** » Tue Jan 18, 2011 9:04 pm

This is quite possibly the dumbest thread I have ever read on here.

woundedknees · Post by **woundedknees** » Tue Jan 18, 2011 9:46 pm

I am confident that was the original poster's intent!

Boom · Post by **Boom** » Tue Jan 18, 2011 9:50 pm

pdxduck wrote:This is quite possibly the dumbest thread I have ever read on here.

+1

sx1080 · Post by **sx1080** » Tue Jan 18, 2011 9:56 pm

woundedknees wrote:I am confident that was the original poster's intent!

who started this stuff

Destroyer77 · Post by **Destroyer77** » Tue Jan 18, 2011 10:06 pm

haha, awesome thread! Only those of us who've been around understand the comedic sarcasm.

lukeyrid13 · Post by **lukeyrid13** » Tue Jan 18, 2011 11:52 pm

what ended up happening to that guy?

TriDuck · Post by **TriDuck** » Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:02 am

lukeyrid13 wrote:what ended up happening to that guy?

He's at Cincinnati

Munchie Legaux or Bust!

Munchie Legaux or Bust!

Re: Munchie Legaux or Bust!

Re: Munchie Legaux or Bust!

Re: Munchie Legaux or Bust!

Re: Munchie Legaux or Bust!

Re: Munchie Legaux or Bust!

Re: Munchie Legaux or Bust!

Re: Munchie Legaux or Bust!

Re: Munchie Legaux or Bust!

Re: Munchie Legaux or Bust!

Re: Munchie Legaux or Bust!

Re: Munchie Legaux or Bust!

Re: Munchie Legaux or Bust!

Re: Munchie Legaux or Bust!

Re: Munchie Legaux or Bust!