http://media.www.dailyemerald.com/media ... 7402.shtml
Why was this even published? It just seems very "amateurish" given the poor season the ducks have had. I'm sorry, but Sim has not had a good season at all. Being second among the team freshman in scoring and second in assists on this team isn't impressive if you look at the stats. Sim is averaging 2 assists per game, and his scoring was done in a few non conference games. Also, he has not been the best freshman on the team. He might have a bright future ahead of him here, but I'm not ready for the Ridnour and Brooks comparisons yet.
Poor article on Sim
Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1
-
duckgrad99
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 6086
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:33 pm
- Location: San Diego
- VinnyKnuckles
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 770
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:34 pm
- Location: Oregon
- Contact:
Re: Poor article on Sim
I think Sim will develop into a good player, but I agree, he has been pretty bad this year.
I know the Daily Emerald is designed to put a positive spin on things, but to have the headline "Simply Stunning" and claim Sim is having an "impact first season" is laughable. Hopefully he lives up to that in these remaining conference games because he certainly hasn't had much of a "simply stunning impact" in conference games thus far.
I know the Daily Emerald is designed to put a positive spin on things, but to have the headline "Simply Stunning" and claim Sim is having an "impact first season" is laughable. Hopefully he lives up to that in these remaining conference games because he certainly hasn't had much of a "simply stunning impact" in conference games thus far.

- KeenanHowry15
- Three Star Recruit
- Posts: 405
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 1:06 am
Re: Poor article on Sim
he is just young and inexperienced, he turns the ball over to often. I think he will be solid in years to come he just needs to keep his head up and keep working hard.

