Poor article on Sim

Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1

Post Reply
duckgrad99
All Pac-12
Posts: 6086
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:33 pm
Location: San Diego

Poor article on Sim

Post by duckgrad99 »

http://media.www.dailyemerald.com/media ... 7402.shtml



Why was this even published? It just seems very "amateurish" given the poor season the ducks have had. I'm sorry, but Sim has not had a good season at all. Being second among the team freshman in scoring and second in assists on this team isn't impressive if you look at the stats. Sim is averaging 2 assists per game, and his scoring was done in a few non conference games. Also, he has not been the best freshman on the team. He might have a bright future ahead of him here, but I'm not ready for the Ridnour and Brooks comparisons yet.
Image
User avatar
VinnyKnuckles
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 770
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:34 pm
Location: Oregon
Contact:

Re: Poor article on Sim

Post by VinnyKnuckles »

I think Sim will develop into a good player, but I agree, he has been pretty bad this year.

I know the Daily Emerald is designed to put a positive spin on things, but to have the headline "Simply Stunning" and claim Sim is having an "impact first season" is laughable. Hopefully he lives up to that in these remaining conference games because he certainly hasn't had much of a "simply stunning impact" in conference games thus far.
Image
User avatar
KeenanHowry15
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 405
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 1:06 am

Re: Poor article on Sim

Post by KeenanHowry15 »

he is just young and inexperienced, he turns the ball over to often. I think he will be solid in years to come he just needs to keep his head up and keep working hard.
Image
Post Reply