Why are we taking four OLBs in this class?

Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1

Post Reply
vagusnerve
Freshman
Posts: 1383
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 12:56 pm

Why are we taking four OLBs in this class?

Post by vagusnerve »

Garrick, Cassell, Coleman and Hardrick.

They're all about 6.1 and 210 lbs.

They're all fast, quick guys.

Seems strange that we'd take four guys who are pretty much mirror images of each other physically in the same class.

Any speculation about the reason for this?
AugustDuck
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 432
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 7:57 am

Re: Why are we taking four OLBs in this class?

Post by AugustDuck »

vagusnerve wrote:Garrick, Cassell, Coleman and Hardrick.

They're all about 6.1 and 210 lbs.

They're all fast, quick guys.

Seems strange that we'd take four guys who are pretty much mirror images of each other physically in the same class.

Any speculation about the reason for this?
and it would have been 5 with Wilson.
User avatar
Phalanx
All Pac-12
Posts: 5282
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:50 pm

Re: Why are we taking four OLBs in this class?

Post by Phalanx »

Coleman and Garrick are listed as strong safeties on Scout if that helps. You're right- they are all basically the same size, but given that Eddie Pleasant can switch from OLB to SS, it seems like the position has some overlap in the Duck scheme.

Either this, or we are planning to trade two of them for a DT. :)
woundedknees
All-American
Posts: 12826
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:06 pm

Re: Why are we taking four OLBs in this class?

Post by woundedknees »

Oregon is hiring Pete Carroll's trainer from the old USC crew, and a strict regimen of undetectable substance will be administered, in order to allow these young men to become DT material.
Autzen Stadium... Where great teams go to die...Hard!

Image
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39359
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Why are we taking four OLBs in this class?

Post by greenyellow »

Phalanx wrote:Coleman and Garrick are listed as strong safeties on Scout if that helps. You're right- they are all basically the same size, but given that Eddie Pleasant can switch from OLB to SS, it seems like the position has some overlap in the Duck scheme.

Either this, or we are planning to trade two of them for a DT. :)
That seems to be the plan with those two. The coaches are developing them into OLBs but one could turn into a DB if they don't progress well as an OLB. Coleman would be a beast as a safety but his build is going to allow him to play OLB.
Image
buckmarkduck
All-American
Posts: 11017
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:22 am
Contact:

Re: Why are we taking four OLBs in this class?

Post by buckmarkduck »

Kenny Rowe is 6'2 235, and right now Coleman is 6'2 205. His coach says he could easily get to 230-240 and not lose speed, maybe the coaches plan on one of these guys moving to DE hybrid spot. Plus I've heard the coaches where concerned about our depth at LB especially after next year, since we like to play so many guys on D during the game.
maxduck
Senior
Posts: 3763
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:37 pm

Re: Why are we taking four OLBs in this class?

Post by maxduck »

buckmarkduck wrote:Kenny Rowe is 6'2 235, and right now Coleman is 6'2 205. His coach says he could easily get to 230-240 and not lose speed, maybe the coaches plan on one of these guys moving to DE hybrid spot. Plus I've heard the coaches where concerned about our depth at LB especially after next year, since we like to play so many guys on D during the game.
It pays dividends on special teams as well.
User avatar
Phalanx
All Pac-12
Posts: 5282
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:50 pm

Re: Why are we taking four OLBs in this class?

Post by Phalanx »

buckmarkduck wrote:Kenny Rowe is 6'2 235, and right now Coleman is 6'2 205. His coach says he could easily get to 230-240 and not lose speed, maybe the coaches plan on one of these guys moving to DE hybrid spot. Plus I've heard the coaches where concerned about our depth at LB especially after next year, since we like to play so many guys on D during the game.
I would so rather see Lyerla in that Kenny Rowe role. He would be amazing.
vagusnerve
Freshman
Posts: 1383
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 12:56 pm

Re: Why are we taking four OLBs in this class?

Post by vagusnerve »

a guy who's 6.2 230 and fast is a pretty good type of guy to have around.

while all these guys are about the same physically right now, I bet in two or three years we see some differences on how they each put on weight and get faster.
User avatar
Juice
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 685
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:19 am
Location: Seattle

Re: Why are we taking four OLBs in this class?

Post by Juice »

whoever we put at the hybrid position needs to be able to cover. love deathrowe, and all that he did for us, but man his coverage... that was tough to watch lol
GrandpaDuck
Senior
Posts: 3312
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2009 3:48 pm

Re: Why are we taking four OLBs in this class?

Post by GrandpaDuck »

Hardrick played inside linebacker and is 6'3". Supposedly up to 215, but we'll see when he gets here.
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39359
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Why are we taking four OLBs in this class?

Post by greenyellow »

GrandpaDuck wrote:Hardrick played inside linebacker and is 6'3". Supposedly up to 215, but we'll see when he gets here.
He can get away with that in HS, but in college, he'll put on some weight once he reaches a college training program. Just look at Casey Matthews. He arrived at 220 but is now easily over 240.
Image
User avatar
Boom
All Pac-12
Posts: 5815
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:32 pm
GM: Houston Rockets

Re: Why are we taking four OLBs in this class?

Post by Boom »

greenyellow wrote:
GrandpaDuck wrote:Hardrick played inside linebacker and is 6'3". Supposedly up to 215, but we'll see when he gets here.
He can get away with that in HS, but in college, he'll put on some weight once he reaches a college training program. Just look at Casey Matthews. He arrived at 220 but is now easily over 240.
Yes

And our program is reaching a point were it's extremely hard for kids to see the field early. I'm going to guess that at least 2 of these guys don't play until their redshirt junior year.
ddigglerjr
One Star Recruit
Posts: 17
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 1:44 pm

Re: Why are we taking four OLBs in this class?

Post by ddigglerjr »

And our program is reaching a point were it's extremely hard for kids to see the field early.
I don't know if that's really true. Yes, we are deep, but the depth is utilized by playing 25+ guys on defense. But, I'm sure you're right about some not seeing the field until their Junior seasons. Some kids take longer to develop.
Post Reply