Just not very positive that this coaching staff can get 2-3 HS DTs in one class.Duck07 wrote:Again, we sign 2 HS DTs next year, depth won't be an issue either. Seriously, we're trying to predict doom and gloom at DT in 2-3 years while ignoring the next 2-3 recruiting classes.TheMaehlMan wrote:I would love to disagree with your statement, but I can't. I think we will be fine next season, but this could end up hurting us badly in time.greenyellow wrote:If only that helped along the DL. It seems Oregon can fill any other position than DT. While it may not impact the team much this year, missing out on so many this year will have ramifications in 2-3 years when the depth isn't as deep as it could be.TheMaehlMan wrote:Tacoi Sumler was just on ESPNU. Said the power has shifted to Oregon in the Pac-10, nice.
Official Signing Day Thread
Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1
- greenyellow
- Moderator

- Posts: 39361
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
- Location: Eugene, OR
Re: Official Signing Day Thread

-
chapelhillduck
- Senior
- Posts: 2408
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 8:15 am
Re: Official Signing Day Thread
Except that USC doesn't have the room to sign anyone next year...
- Zyme
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5582
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:35 pm
- GM: New York Knicks GM
Re: Official Signing Day Thread
You do realize that with a 3-4 scheme you will maybe need 3 DTs in playing shape. All you need is one decent DT/year to have a decent squad. Our DL issues are not as big as advertised..greenyellow wrote:Just not very positive that this coaching staff can get 2-3 HS DTs in one class.Duck07 wrote:Again, we sign 2 HS DTs next year, depth won't be an issue either. Seriously, we're trying to predict doom and gloom at DT in 2-3 years while ignoring the next 2-3 recruiting classes.TheMaehlMan wrote:I would love to disagree with your statement, but I can't. I think we will be fine next season, but this could end up hurting us badly in time.greenyellow wrote:If only that helped along the DL. It seems Oregon can fill any other position than DT. While it may not impact the team much this year, missing out on so many this year will have ramifications in 2-3 years when the depth isn't as deep as it could be.TheMaehlMan wrote:Tacoi Sumler was just on ESPNU. Said the power has shifted to Oregon in the Pac-10, nice.
DASL1 Rings: '93, '94
K's HOF:
Mark "Wholly Mammoth" Eaton | Retired 2002, age 44: 24 min/8pts/8reb/1stl/2.5 blks/1 TO
Michael "Sweet Home" Ansley | Retired 2007, age 42: 33 min/16pts/8 reb/1.5stl/.5 blks/.5 TO Lifetime .550 shooting %
Gheorghe "Ghiţă (Ghitza, Little George)" Mureșan | Retired 2008, age 36: 35Min/16.2pt/12.2reb/2.1ast/1.6stl/2.9blk/1.3TO (.461/.715/.000)
K's HOF:
Mark "Wholly Mammoth" Eaton | Retired 2002, age 44: 24 min/8pts/8reb/1stl/2.5 blks/1 TO
Michael "Sweet Home" Ansley | Retired 2007, age 42: 33 min/16pts/8 reb/1.5stl/.5 blks/.5 TO Lifetime .550 shooting %
Gheorghe "Ghiţă (Ghitza, Little George)" Mureșan | Retired 2008, age 36: 35Min/16.2pt/12.2reb/2.1ast/1.6stl/2.9blk/1.3TO (.461/.715/.000)
- Duck07
- All-American
- Posts: 17123
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
- Location: Parts Unknown
Re: Official Signing Day Thread
We don't run a 3-4 D and not a single one of our DTs is capable of playing as a true 34 NT except maybe Ricky (but then our ends are too small). We may run a 3 down line at times, but its simply a package we use with a few blitzes and zone drops and we usually still have 2 DTs on the field.Zyme wrote:You do realize that with a 3-4 scheme you will maybe need 3 DTs in playing shape. All you need is one decent DT/year to have a decent squad. Our DL issues are not as big as advertised..greenyellow wrote:Just not very positive that this coaching staff can get 2-3 HS DTs in one class.Duck07 wrote:Again, we sign 2 HS DTs next year, depth won't be an issue either. Seriously, we're trying to predict doom and gloom at DT in 2-3 years while ignoring the next 2-3 recruiting classes.TheMaehlMan wrote:I would love to disagree with your statement, but I can't. I think we will be fine next season, but this could end up hurting us badly in time.greenyellow wrote:If only that helped along the DL. It seems Oregon can fill any other position than DT. While it may not impact the team much this year, missing out on so many this year will have ramifications in 2-3 years when the depth isn't as deep as it could be.TheMaehlMan wrote:Tacoi Sumler was just on ESPNU. Said the power has shifted to Oregon in the Pac-10, nice.

- nogerO
- Senior
- Posts: 4517
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:48 pm
- Location: Wyoming
Re: Official Signing Day Thread
I believe we ran more than half our defensive snaps this year in the 3-4 defense.Duck07 wrote:We don't run a 3-4 D and not a single one of our DTs is capable of playing as a true 34 NT except maybe Ricky (but then our ends are too small). We may run a 3 down line at times, but its simply a package we use with a few blitzes and zone drops and we usually still have 2 DTs on the field.Zyme wrote:You do realize that with a 3-4 scheme you will maybe need 3 DTs in playing shape. All you need is one decent DT/year to have a decent squad. Our DL issues are not as big as advertised..greenyellow wrote:Just not very positive that this coaching staff can get 2-3 HS DTs in one class.Duck07 wrote:Again, we sign 2 HS DTs next year, depth won't be an issue either. Seriously, we're trying to predict doom and gloom at DT in 2-3 years while ignoring the next 2-3 recruiting classes.TheMaehlMan wrote:I would love to disagree with your statement, but I can't. I think we will be fine next season, but this could end up hurting us badly in time.greenyellow wrote: If only that helped along the DL. It seems Oregon can fill any other position than DT. While it may not impact the team much this year, missing out on so many this year will have ramifications in 2-3 years when the depth isn't as deep as it could be.
"To give anything less than your best, is to sacrifice the gift." - Steve Prefontaine
- Duck07
- All-American
- Posts: 17123
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
- Location: Parts Unknown
Re: Official Signing Day Thread
No, we didn't and we still don't run a 34 scheme. Kenny working as a standup end =/= 34. The reason for this comes down to gap coverage and other pre-snap resonsibilities. The techniques used by the lineman are different as well as what the LBs do. As I said the last time, we run very few plays out of the "34" and chances are its either going to be cover 3 zone blitz or a max coverage.nogerO wrote:I believe we ran more than half our defensive snaps this year in the 3-4 defense.Duck07 wrote:We don't run a 3-4 D and not a single one of our DTs is capable of playing as a true 34 NT except maybe Ricky (but then our ends are too small). We may run a 3 down line at times, but its simply a package we use with a few blitzes and zone drops and we usually still have 2 DTs on the field.Zyme wrote:You do realize that with a 3-4 scheme you will maybe need 3 DTs in playing shape. All you need is one decent DT/year to have a decent squad. Our DL issues are not as big as advertised..greenyellow wrote:Just not very positive that this coaching staff can get 2-3 HS DTs in one class.Duck07 wrote:Again, we sign 2 HS DTs next year, depth won't be an issue either. Seriously, we're trying to predict doom and gloom at DT in 2-3 years while ignoring the next 2-3 recruiting classes.TheMaehlMan wrote: I would love to disagree with your statement, but I can't. I think we will be fine next season, but this could end up hurting us badly in time.

- EncinitasDuck
- Five Star Recruit
- Posts: 1158
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 6:45 pm
- Location: Grants Pass Oregon
Re: Official Signing Day Thread
NOt to change the subject off the D-Line, but I think the thing that excites me the most about this class is the size of the WRs. Have we ever had 3 solid WRs over 6'? Add in Tuinei and we now have 4 plus some serious speed. Can't wait to see this new height/speed hit the field.
- Duck07
- All-American
- Posts: 17123
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
- Location: Parts Unknown
Re: Official Signing Day Thread
The 07 WRs dwarf these guys. J-Will and Cam were both bigger than our LBs and Garren and Paysinger were both 6'1/6'2. DJ was a frosh but didn't see time until all the injuries hit and our smallest wr was Derrick Jones.EncinitasDuck wrote:NOt to change the subject off the D-Line, but I think the thing that excites me the most about this class is the size of the WRs. Have we ever had 3 solid WRs over 6'? Add in Tuinei and we now have 4 plus some serious speed. Can't wait to see this new height/speed hit the field.
The speed is what really separates this wr class though.

- EncinitasDuck
- Five Star Recruit
- Posts: 1158
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 6:45 pm
- Location: Grants Pass Oregon
Re: Official Signing Day Thread
OK, I'll give you Williams @ 6-5, but at 6-3 and 6-2 the others hardly "dwarf" Kelley and Vaughn both of whom are listed at 6-2.Duck07 wrote:The 07 WRs dwarf these guys. J-Will and Cam were both bigger than our LBs and Garren and Paysinger were both 6'1/6'2. DJ was a frosh but didn't see time until all the injuries hit and our smallest wr was Derrick Jones.EncinitasDuck wrote:NOt to change the subject off the D-Line, but I think the thing that excites me the most about this class is the size of the WRs. Have we ever had 3 solid WRs over 6'? Add in Tuinei and we now have 4 plus some serious speed. Can't wait to see this new height/speed hit the field.
The speed is what really separates this wr class though.
We are agreed on the speed. Will be fun to watch.
- Duck07
- All-American
- Posts: 17123
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
- Location: Parts Unknown
Re: Official Signing Day Thread
BJ Kelley and Rashaan Vaughn both lack the size of Colvin or Paysinger though. I'm not kidding when I say that Cam, JWill and DJ were bigger than all of our LBs that year. In time, they will gain size, but you stand them next to one another and you would argee that they would be dwarfed.EncinitasDuck wrote:OK, I'll give you Williams @ 6-5, but at 6-3 and 6-2 the others hardly "dwarf" Kelley and Vaughn both of whom are listed at 6-2.Duck07 wrote:The 07 WRs dwarf these guys. J-Will and Cam were both bigger than our LBs and Garren and Paysinger were both 6'1/6'2. DJ was a frosh but didn't see time until all the injuries hit and our smallest wr was Derrick Jones.EncinitasDuck wrote:NOt to change the subject off the D-Line, but I think the thing that excites me the most about this class is the size of the WRs. Have we ever had 3 solid WRs over 6'? Add in Tuinei and we now have 4 plus some serious speed. Can't wait to see this new height/speed hit the field.
The speed is what really separates this wr class though.
We are agreed on the speed. Will be fun to watch.

- EncinitasDuck
- Five Star Recruit
- Posts: 1158
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 6:45 pm
- Location: Grants Pass Oregon
Re: Official Signing Day Thread
I hear you, size matters. Will be interesting to see how much weight Ratcliff can put on these guys.Duck07 wrote:BJ Kelley and Rashaan Vaughn both lack the size of Colvin or Paysinger though. I'm not kidding when I say that Cam, JWill and DJ were bigger than all of our LBs that year. In time, they will gain size, but you stand them next to one another and you would argee that they would be dwarfed.EncinitasDuck wrote:OK, I'll give you Williams @ 6-5, but at 6-3 and 6-2 the others hardly "dwarf" Kelley and Vaughn both of whom are listed at 6-2.Duck07 wrote:The 07 WRs dwarf these guys. J-Will and Cam were both bigger than our LBs and Garren and Paysinger were both 6'1/6'2. DJ was a frosh but didn't see time until all the injuries hit and our smallest wr was Derrick Jones.EncinitasDuck wrote:NOt to change the subject off the D-Line, but I think the thing that excites me the most about this class is the size of the WRs. Have we ever had 3 solid WRs over 6'? Add in Tuinei and we now have 4 plus some serious speed. Can't wait to see this new height/speed hit the field.
The speed is what really separates this wr class though.
We are agreed on the speed. Will be fun to watch.
-
uodux1212
- Senior
- Posts: 3965
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:44 pm
- Location: Portland, OR
Re: Official Signing Day Thread
EncinitasDuck wrote:I hear you, size matters.

"How do we go from nine to one?" - Chip Kelly
“Our expectations are to win every game we play." - CK
- Duck07
- All-American
- Posts: 17123
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
- Location: Parts Unknown
Re: Official Signing Day Thread
http://www.staradvertiser.com/news/brea ... 14809.htmlThe All-State passer was an early (summer) commit to Oregon and never wavered since.
"I'm excited. I can't wait to go," Mariota said.
Even with his solid commitment, Washington was among the schools still trying to phone Mariota up until yesterday. Mariota wouldn't pick up the phone.
He wasn't the only local standout to sign with the Ducks. Kamehameha defensive end Koa Ka'ai made good on his recent commitment and signed with the perennial national-title contender. Ka'ai was possibly the most widely-recruited of Hawaii's prospects.
"It's a great relief," he said. "I just got into Stanford a few days ago. They would've been my second choice, or Nebraska."
HAHA, I'm liking Marcus more and more, even he doesn't want to listen to what the poodles are selling!

- KeenanHowry15
- Three Star Recruit
- Posts: 405
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 1:06 am
Re: Official Signing Day Thread
Sorry If I have been living under a rock the past few days, but what time is DaT's press conference again?

- Duck07
- All-American
- Posts: 17123
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
- Location: Parts Unknown
Re: Official Signing Day Thread
I think this is has its goneKeenanHowry15 wrote:Sorry If I have been living under a rock the past few days, but what time is DaT's press conference again?
first it was set for 5
it got moved (this morning iirc) to 7
i think finally its been settled at 6
