Anybody else?

[oregontrack]

Call me crazy, but I believe there is a middle ground between bad programs and Duke/Kansas. Are you being serious? I can't tell if you've just packed it in and are throwing out crazy, nonsensical one-liners because you're bored.

[Boom]

Call me crazy, but I believe there is a middle ground between bad programs and Duke/Kansas. Are you being serious? I can't tell if you've just packed it in and are throwing out crazy, nonsensical one-liners because you're bored.

Sort of like calling most PAC10 programs shitty?

[distantobserver]

I'd rather have the chance for a good run in the tourny every year rather than knowing the season is meaningless by this point most years. The runs were great but there was nothing in between, I'd rather have fun competitive seasons every year. No fan base wants to tune in once every 5-6 years.

Well EK took the ducks to 5 tourneys in 13yrs..... So 1 in every 2.5 years.... is pretty standard for Pac10 teams not named UCLA & Arizona.

But from your previous posts you have made it clear that you don't consider first round exits anything of value (which is an argument that has some merit), so for what you care about Kent essentially only made the tournament twice.

You can't argue it both ways...

[oregontrack]

Call me crazy, but I believe there is a middle ground between bad programs and Duke/Kansas. Are you being serious? I can't tell if you've just packed it in and are throwing out crazy, nonsensical one-liners because you're bored.

Sort of like calling most PAC10 programs shitty?

Are they not?

[TheMaehlMan]

You guys do realize that it is possible to have a couple elite 8 runs and to make the NCAA tournament consistently, right?